Re: Updating JDK libraries to use Project Coin features

2010-12-16 Thread Alan Bateman
Joe Darcy wrote: : Yes, we plan to keep at least the javac portions of the langtools repository buildable with JDK 6 for just such bootstrapping reasons. For some time, we've had the constraint that javac in JDK (N+1) is buildable with JDK N, which precludes use of new language features and

There was an error trying to initialize the HPI library.

2011-01-20 Thread Alan Bateman
If you don't build jdk7, or you build the complete forest, then you can ignore this mail. For those that do partial builds of jdk7, and build the jdk repository in conjunction with an import JDK, then read on. An upcoming build (probably b128) will have changes that remove libhpi.so (the leg

Re: Question regarding NET_BindV6() and the "double bind"

2011-04-26 Thread Alan Bateman
Xavier Roche wrote: Hi folks, In the Windows version of NET_BindV6() [jdk/src/windows/native/java/net/ net_util_md.c], the code seems to be doing the binding twice when using a wildcard address (see b->ipv4_fd and b->ipv6_fd) The comment says: (..) * The more complicated case is when the re

Re: AsynchronousSocketChannel operation cancelling on b145

2011-06-21 Thread Alan Bateman
Gian Franco Zabarino wrote: I've been testing this on b145, and after I cancel a read request by cancelling the Future, I can no longer use the AsynchronousSocketChannel for reading. On NIO I always had the opportunity to remove the key from the Selector, and then to register the SocketCha

Re: Unicode 6.0 or 6,1

2011-07-14 Thread Alan Bateman
Ivan Krylov wrote: Folks, I want to draw attention to the documentation error. As discussed at the "Meet the Experts: Q&A and Panel Discussion" @ JDK7 launch Unicode 6.1 is supported in JDK7. However the Features page http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/features/#f497 still says Unicode 6.0

Re: Expecting a stackmap frame at branch target

2011-09-12 Thread Alan Bateman
Frédéric Camblor wrote: Hi everyone ! I just migrated to openjdk 7 on my project and, just after the upgrade, most of my unit test were in failure, throwing following exception : java.lang.VerifyError: Expecting a stackmap frame at branch target 81 in method fr.fsh.bbeeg.common.config.BBEEGConf

Re: Fix for bug 6695402

2011-10-24 Thread Alan Bateman
On 23/10/2011 23:23, Nikolay Samofatov wrote: Hello, All! The fix for JDK6 and JDK7 is pretty necessary as Russian tax office uses Russian names for its web service definitions. It's probably best to bring this up on the security-dev list, and also go through the "How to contribute" page [1] t

Re: there is a bug in openjdk7.

2013-08-05 Thread Alan Bateman
On 05/08/2013 02:03, Mauro Sanna wrote: Hello. I'm using java version "1.7.0_25" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.3.12) (7u25-2.3.12-2) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.7-b01, mixed mode) As you see here http://jira.grails.org/browse/GRAILS-10183 it seems that openjdk has a bug that prev

Re: there is a bug in openjdk7.

2013-08-05 Thread Alan Bateman
On 05/08/2013 13:06, Andrew Hughes wrote: : "Sync up" with what exactly?? There hasn't been a 7u release since the 28th of August, 2012: http://jdk7.java.net/source.html 2.3.12 is synced with the last u25 tag in the OpenJDK repositories but clearly this doesn't include whatever fix is requir

Re: there is a bug in openjdk7.

2013-08-05 Thread Alan Bateman
On 05/08/2013 15:16, Andrew Hughes wrote: : The problem is this change: changeset: 6767:6bf5fa233df0 user:mchung date:Tue Jul 02 13:23:35 2013 -0700 summary: 8014925: Disable sun.reflect.Reflection.getCallerClass(int) with a temporary switch to re-enable it as mentioned