The JDK 7 Project has reached a major milestone: It is Feature-Complete.
This means that all of the planned features have been implemented and
integrated into the master forest, along with their unit tests, and all
other planned tests have been written and run on a representative set of
platforms.
> From: Steve Poole
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:38:03 +
> Hi all - I'm probably looking in all the wrong places but has JDK7
> completed the "Feature Complete" milestone? Its listed as ending on
> 16 December here http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/
Yes, we're Feature-Complete, per m
> From: Steve Poole
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:59:58 +
> ...
>
> What are your thoughts on having a single , visible bug database? I'm
> well aware of the the pain involved in moving from one tracking system
> to another - I assume that unless your internal system is based on
> something
> From: Steve Poole
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:55:31 +
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 11:37 -0800, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> As with any large software project, there are some exceptions:
>>
>> - Two features are not quite finished but have been approved for
>> post-FC in
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:37:54 +0100
> From: volker.simo...@gmail.com
> are there any plans when the JDK8-split will happen? Will it be right
> after the Developer Preview in February or only after the GA?
Somewhere in between, most likely around mid-April when the rampdown
phase starts. From
> From: Steve Poole
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:38:57 +
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:32 -0800, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> More generally, I'm aware that the JDK 7 development process is not as
>> transparent as many people (me included) would like. We'll do what we
>> can to address th
We've reached Milestone 12, also known as the "Developer Preview" release.
We'll strongly encourage developers, deployers, and end users to download
and test this build and submit bug reports promptly, ideally by the end
of March.
For reference, the proprietary Oracle builds can be found here:
ht
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Wielaard
> On Wed, February 23, 2011 18:19, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> For reference, the proprietary Oracle builds can be found here:
>> http://jdk7.java.net/preview/.
>
> I also commented on your blog, but maybe this
We're past the "All targeted bugs addressed" milestone of 11 May, per
the high-level schedule posted back in January [1]. We're currently
analyzing about 70 open bugs. We expect to defer most of these to a
future release but a few will likely be fixed in JDK 7.
As of this Wednesday, 18 May, only
The JDK 8 Project has just been created.
If you contributed at least one changeset to JDK 7 then you've
automatically been subscribed to the jdk8-dev mailing list.
If you didn't contribute to JDK 7 you're still welcome to subscribe
to the JDK 8 list, but you'll have to do so yourself.
Either way
FYI, Oracle will be providing Reference Implementations for Java SE 7
(JSR 336) under both the GPL (with the Classpath Exception) as well as
the traditional commercial BCL (Binary Code License).
Details:
http://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/moving_to_openjdk_as_the
- Mark
Very nearly ...
Build 146 has been tagged in the JDK 7 master forest. We're still
chasing down a few bugs, so this isn't quite a Release Candidate, but
it's very close. Binaries of this build will undergo a final round of
JCK testing and then, if all goes well, be declared the Reference
Implemen
After an initial round of testing we've declared build 147 to be the
first Release Candidate for JDK 7. If no new showstopper issues are
reported, and if JSR 336 [1] and the component JSRs pass their Final
Approval Ballots in the JCP, then this will be the GA build for release
later this month per
2011/7/14 5:52 -0700, ivan.kry...@oracle.com:
> Afaik, 6.1 is not a final standard
> (http://www.unicode.org/versions/enumeratedversions.html) yet but Alex
> and Mark said "6.1" on the 9th minute of the Panel Discussion video
> (http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/events/java7/index.html) therefore
2011/6/9 7:33 -0700, mark.reinh...@oracle.com:
> FYI, Oracle will be providing Reference Implementations for Java SE 7
> (JSR 336) under both the GPL (with the Classpath Exception) as well as
> the traditional commercial BCL (Binary Code License).
The RI binaries are now available: http://jdk7.jav
2011/7/20 14:07 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com:
> On 08:41 Wed 20 Jul, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> The RI binaries are now available: http://jdk7.java.net/java-se-7-ri
>
> I thought the release wasn't until the 28th? Congrats. on getting it done
> early!
Shipping the RI is part of finishing t
2011/7/20 23:40 -0700, henri.go...@gmail.com:
> Question about OS/X.
>
> Is there any date about a RI for it ?
Short answer: No, not yet.
Longer answer: We don't yet have a date for when a supported version of
JDK 7 on Mac OS/X will be available. When it is available it won't be an
official JCP
> It won't be an official JCP-sanctioned Reference Implementation of Java SE 7 ?
>
> What does it means exactly (I may misunderstood since english is not
> my primary language).
A JSR in the JCP must provide a Specification, a Conformance Test Suite
(CTS), and one or more Reference Implementation
2011/7/25 17:00 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com:
> On 15:07 Wed 20 Jul 2011, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> Shipping the RI is part of finishing the JCP Final Release,
>> which is a different thing from shipping a supported product.
>>
>> 2011/7/20 14:07 -0700, ahug...@redhat.com:
>>> But aren't the
2011/12/22 14:36 -0800, oma...@redhat.com:
> $ hg jcheck
> hg: unknown command 'jcheck'
>
> Is that a custom mercurial extension? Where can I get it?
Yes, it's a custom extension. It's not available
outside Oracle, but we're working to fix that.
- Mark
20 matches
Mail list logo
