Re: Rule 1

On 3/14/12 11:52 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote: On 3/14/2012 6:28 AM, Richard Bair wrote: One question though : are the committers who are being added to 7u-dev as a consequence of the mac port also committers on 8 ? We'll have to run separate votes for them on 8. What a pain! Completely agree

jdk7u4-b16: HotSpot

hs23-b17 has been integrated into jdk7u4-b16. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4/rev/901b753e13ee http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4/corba/rev/bfca64f13d58 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4/hotspot/rev/c6a96f7a781d http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4/jaxp/rev/5c881231f116 http

Re: Rule 1

On 3/14/2012 6:28 AM, Richard Bair wrote: One question though : are the committers who are being added to 7u-dev as a consequence of the mac port also committers on 8 ? We'll have to run separate votes for them on 8. What a pain! Completely agree here. What's even worse, voting cannot be i

[7u6] Request for approval for CR 7144488: Infinite recursion for some equals tests in Collections

Request to backport from jdk8 to 7u (7u6). Identical changeset to that of JDK 8 : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/0a350fb8b174 bug report : http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7144488 regards, Sean.

[7u6] Request for approval for CR 7133138 : Improve io performance around timezone lookups

This is a request to backport 7133138 to 7u-dev repo. Resulting code is identical. jdk 8 changeset : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a589a8dbde79 bug report : http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7133138 Regards, Sean

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u4/hotspot: 7 new changesets

Changeset: cf8928e22f20 Author:amurillo Date: 2012-02-28 15:08 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4/hotspot/rev/cf8928e22f20 7148663: new hotspot build - hs23-b17 Reviewed-by: jcoomes ! make/hotspot_version Changeset: 3322dd7f0a4d Author:dsamersoff Date: 201

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/hotspot: 7 new changesets

Changeset: cf8928e22f20 Author:amurillo Date: 2012-02-28 15:08 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/hotspot/rev/cf8928e22f20 7148663: new hotspot build - hs23-b17 Reviewed-by: jcoomes ! make/hotspot_version Changeset: 3322dd7f0a4d Author:dsamersoff Date:

Re: CFV: New JDK7u Committer: Scott Kovatch

Vote: yes I hereby nominate Scott Kovatch (OpenJDK user name: skovatch) to JDK7u Committer. Many of us know Scott as a former member of Apple JDK team, and many pieces of Mac OS X Port code were actually written by Scott long time ago. He is now a member of development and client teams at O

Re: CFV: New JDK7u Committer: Mike Swingler

Vote: yes I hereby nominate Mike Swingler (OpenJDK user name: swingler) to JDK7u Committer. I don't think any more information about Mike should be provided here, we all know Mike's contribution to Java. Votes are due by Mar 26, 2012. Only current JDK7u Committers [1] are eligible to vote

Re: [7u4] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs23-b17

Approved. Cheers, Edvard On 14 mar 2012, at 18:17, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: > Requesting approval to integrate hs23-b17 into jdk7u4-b16. > > A webrev is available at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/7u4/hs23-b17-jdk7u4-b16.webrev/ > > Pre-integration testing was successfully per

Re: CFV: New JDK7u Committer: Mike Swingler

Vote: yes

[7u4] Request for approval for bulk integration of hs23-b17

Requesting approval to integrate hs23-b17 into jdk7u4-b16. A webrev is available at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/7u4/hs23-b17-jdk7u4-b16.webrev/ Pre-integration testing was successfully performed; SQE has analyzed the results and approved. The fixes in the proposed integration are bel

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk: 7141141: Add 3 new test scenarios for testing Main-Class attribute in jar manifest file

Changeset: cb04b01f447a Author:ksrini Date: 2012-03-14 09:52 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/cb04b01f447a 7141141: Add 3 new test scenarios for testing Main-Class attribute in jar manifest file Summary: Tests backported from jdk8 by bvaidya to jdk7u Re

Re: [7u4] Request for approval for CR 7088989 - Improve the performance for T4 by utilizing the newly provided crypto APIs

- Original Message - > Thanks, Valerie, the change is now retroactively approved. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > On 2/9/12 12:18 AM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote: > > > > First, I apologize for missing this request approval process before > > proceeding with the putback. > > I mistaken

Re: CFV: New JDK7u Committer: Scott Kovatch

- Original Message - > > I hereby nominate Scott Kovatch (OpenJDK user name: skovatch) to > JDK7u > Committer. > > Many of us know Scott as a former member of Apple JDK team, and many > pieces of Mac OS X Port code were actually written by Scott long time > ago. He is now a member of deve

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk: 7027139: getFirstIndex() does not return the first index that has changed

Changeset: 7027e9a8c0be Author:rupashka Date: 2012-03-14 16:35 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/7027e9a8c0be 7027139: getFirstIndex() does not return the first index that has changed Reviewed-by: alexp ! src/share/classes/javax/swing/DefaultListSelectio

[7u4] Request for phase 2 approval for CR 7145827: [macosx] JCK failure in b11: FocusableWindow3

Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7145827 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/7145827/webrev.0/ Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-March/003555.html Reviewer: Artem Ananiev (art) Rationale for inclusion in 7u4: JCK failure. Thanks, Anton.

Re: Rule 1

>> One question though : are the committers who are being added to 7u-dev >> as a consequence of the mac port also committers on 8 ? > > We'll have to run separate votes for them on 8. What a pain!

Re: Rule 1

On 3/14/12 5:35 AM, Phil Race wrote: > One question though : are the committers who are being added to 7u-dev > as a consequence of the mac port also committers on 8 ? We'll have to run separate votes for them on 8. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principa

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/jdk: 7125044: [macosx] Test failure because Component.transferFocus() works differently in applet and application

Changeset: e00e98bc0c0e Author:ant Date: 2012-03-14 16:49 +0300 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/jdk/rev/e00e98bc0c0e 7125044: [macosx] Test failure because Component.transferFocus() works differently in applet and application Reviewed-by: art ! src/share/classes/j

Re: Rule 1

Bug fix deficits are a pain to manage as we learned in 7. So yes, this would be a good thing. Providing a pointer to the already pushed JDK8 change set in the approval requests as is generally required for back ports would help enforce this. One question though : are the committers who are be

Re: Rule 1

First of all, congratulations to all of you who have worked on getting the os x port forward ported to 8! I'd say we should start enforcing that fixes gets pushed to 8 first as soon as possible. Otherwise we will build up a list of forward ports pretty quickly. At this point in time I would im

Rule 1

Just a quick process question. Rule 1 [1] is that all changes that aren't specific to 7u must go into 8 first. Now that the Mac port is in the jdk8 master then does it mean that Mac specific fixes are now required to go into 8 first or is there a grace period? -Alan [1] http://openjdk.java

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/jdk: 3 new changesets

Changeset: 4c592e287e7d Author:serb Date: 2012-03-14 12:27 +0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/jdk/rev/4c592e287e7d 7124523: [macosx] b216: Mising part of applet UI Reviewed-by: anthony ! src/share/demo/applets/CardTest/example1.html ! src/share/demo/applets/Dith