Re: 7172708: 32/64 bit type issues on Windows

2012-06-05 Thread David Holmes
This is being taken up on hotspot-runtime-dev, but I wanted to make a couple of responses to Alan ... On 6/06/2012 12:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: I would suggest moving the thread to hotspot-dev or hotspot-runtime-dev. On attempting to use -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=5g on a 32-bit system then idea

jdk7u6-b13: HotSpot

2012-06-05 Thread Alejandro E Murillo
hs23.2-b04 has been integrated into jdk7u6-b13. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/rev/9b9a6d318e8a http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/corba/rev/76bee3576f61 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/28746e6d615f http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jaxp/rev/15b71daf5e69 http:/

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot: 8 new changesets

2012-06-05 Thread john . coomes
Changeset: d8fb2e80e074 Author:amurillo Date: 2012-05-25 13:53 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/d8fb2e80e074 7171852: new hotspot build - hs23.2-b04 Reviewed-by: jcoomes ! make/hotspot_version Changeset: 7d4e6dabc6bf Author:dcubed Date: 2012-0

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot: 8 new changesets

2012-06-05 Thread john . coomes
Changeset: d8fb2e80e074 Author:amurillo Date: 2012-05-25 13:53 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot/rev/d8fb2e80e074 7171852: new hotspot build - hs23.2-b04 Reviewed-by: jcoomes ! make/hotspot_version Changeset: 7d4e6dabc6bf Author:dcubed Date: 20

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot: Added tag jdk7u6-b12 for changeset f08a3a0e60c3

2012-06-05 Thread john . coomes
Changeset: 36f64ab3c9ca Author:katleman Date: 2012-05-31 14:06 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot/rev/36f64ab3c9ca Added tag jdk7u6-b12 for changeset f08a3a0e60c3 ! .hgtags

Re: 7172708: 32/64 bit type issues on Windows

2012-06-05 Thread Chris Dennis
As Alan suggested I've created a new thread on hotspot-runtime-dev to discuss the command line parsing issues. On Jun 5, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 05/06/2012 15:29, Chris Dennis wrote: >> Alan, >> >> The 5g issue is kind of complicated. The current behavior of 32bit JVMs as

Re: 7172708: 32/64 bit type issues on Windows

2012-06-05 Thread Alan Bateman
On 05/06/2012 15:29, Chris Dennis wrote: Alan, The 5g issue is kind of complicated. The current behavior of 32bit JVMs as I understand it is that the 5g will get narrowed down to a 32bit value by the printf used to propagate the value across from the launcher and in to the system properties

Re: 7172708: 32/64 bit type issues on Windows

2012-06-05 Thread Chris Dennis
Alan, The 5g issue is kind of complicated. The current behavior of 32bit JVMs as I understand it is that the 5g will get narrowed down to a 32bit value by the printf used to propagate the value across from the launcher and in to the system properties of the spawned JVM. Consider the result of

Re: 7172708: 32/64 bit type issues on Windows

2012-06-05 Thread Chris Dennis
David, My feeling on this is that the Hotspot changes should go through hotspot-runtime-dev, and that since they represent a fix to a recent regression (in 1.7.0_04) they should probably go now without waiting for the test changes in the jdk project. I'll start a new thread on hotspot-runtime-

Re: 7172708: 32/64 bit type issues on Windows

2012-06-05 Thread Alan Bateman
On 04/06/2012 14:38, Chris Dennis wrote: : The patch to increase test coverage to cover this issue is against the jdk sources, however the issue here is more complicated. While modifying the LimitDirectMemory.sh jtreg test to cover this issue I've run in to some problems with the test - the