Changeset: 3ba27e5ab1f9
Author:weijun
Date: 2012-10-23 10:02 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/3ba27e5ab1f9
8001208: Fix for KRB5CCNAME not complete
Reviewed-by: xuelei
! src/share/classes/sun/security/krb5/internal/ccache/FileCredentialsCache.java
! tes
On 10/23/2012 12:09 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
I noticed that you've used a record of type JIRA "sub-task" for this
fix. I'm not sure why type "bug" can't be used and it's an issue we'll
have to discuss as we become more familiar with JIRA.
Oh, I thought sub-task is a per
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
I noticed that you've used a record of type JIRA "sub-task" for this
fix. I'm not sure why type "bug" can't be used and it's an issue we'll
have to discuss as we become more familiar with JIRA.
regards,
Sean.
On 22/10/2012 19:09, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi All
This is a
Hi All
This is a request to backport a jdk8 fix into jdk7u-dev.
The bug should be available at
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8001208
Basically, it recognizes the KRB5CCNAME environment variable which can
take the form of FILE:/tmp/ccache but has not removed the FILE: p
Changeset: 75f67d481b91
Author:robm
Date: 2012-10-23 03:00 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/75f67d481b91
7172826: (se) Selector based on the Solaris event port mechanism
Reviewed-by: alanb
! make/java/nio/Makefile
! make/java/nio/mapfile-linux
! make/ja
2012/10/22 12:06 -0700, christian.thalin...@oracle.com:
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:39 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> So if I don't use invokedynamic at all then none of these changes
>> are relevant?
>
> Correct. Only when you run a program that uses any JSR 292
> functionality the 292 subs
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 22/10/2012 05:56, Oleg Pekhovskiy wrote:
Hi Alexander,
back-port is looking good to me.
Thanks,
Oleg
10/22/2012 4:42 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
This is a request to backport the JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u12:
7199708: FileChooser crashs whe
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 21/10/2012 23:15, Sean Chou wrote:
Hi,
This is request for approval to push the fix of 7105640 to jdk7u,
please take a look.
Link to the bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7105640
Changeset in jdk8: http://hg.openjdk.java.ne
Changeset: d09c4a2ca739
Author:mduigou
Date: 2012-09-11 07:42 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/d09c4a2ca739
7189926: Reduce test size for default run. Add additional run enabling
alternative hashing.
Reviewed-by: alanb
! test/java/util/Map/Collisions.j
Approved!
On Oct 22, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> I would like to backport these test changes to JDK 7u so that the relevant
> test does not have to be kept on the exclusion list. This work has now been
> running successfully in JDK 8 since September 18th.
>
> There are three issu
I would like to backport these test changes to JDK 7u so that the relevant test
does not have to be kept on the exclusion list. This work has now been running
successfully in JDK 8 since September 18th.
There are three issues:
7199249: TEST_BUG : Add /othervm to Collisions.java @run main with -
On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:39 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
> 2012/10/18 12:17 -0700, christian.thalin...@oracle.com:
>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:00 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>>> Um, isn't this an awfully big change for what's supposed to be a low-risk
>>> update release?
>>
>> It's bi
2012/10/18 12:17 -0700, christian.thalin...@oracle.com:
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:00 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
>> Um, isn't this an awfully big change for what's supposed to be a low-risk
>> update release?
>
> It's big, indeed. But actually it's a bug fix and it only touches JSR
> 292 r
- Original Message -
> Meant to get to this one earlier Rob. Approved for 7u-dev.
>
> If the changesets are applying cleanly to 7u, I'd suggest keeping the
> changesets separate just to follow in line with past trends. Not
> mandatory though.
Please keep a 1-to-1 correspondence between ch
- Original Message -
>
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Seán Coffey
> wrote:
>
> > Christian,
> >
> > It is quite a big code change for 7u, one worthy of more testing
> > before integration perhaps. Doesn't this code introduce new
> > dependencies on the VM code ? How are changes progr
- Original Message -
> 2012/10/18 11:54 -0700, christian.thalin...@oracle.com:
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/8000999/
> > 8000999: backport of JSR 292 to 7u
> >
> > This is an umbrella bug for these changes (which are backported in
> > one
> > changeset):
> >
> > ...
>
>
On 10/20/12 10:20 AM, John Coomes wrote:
> Christian Thalinger (christian.thalin...@oracle.com) wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Christian Thalinger
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>
Christian,
It is quite a big code change for 7u,
Thanks, Alejandro - Pre-approved pending positive test results!
On 10/20/12 6:19 PM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote:
> Requesting approval to integrate hs24-b23 into jdk7u12-b01.
>
> A webrev is available at:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amurillo/7u12/hs24-b23-jdk7u12-b01.webrev/
>
> Pre-integrat
Hi Alexander,
back-port is looking good to me.
Thanks,
Oleg
10/22/2012 4:42 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
This is a request to backport the JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u12:
7199708: FileChooser crashs when opening large folder
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7199708
The
Hello,
This is a request to backport the JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u12:
7199708: FileChooser crashs when opening large folder
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7199708
The fix has already been pushed to JDK 8, as:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/9c6f60a4e996
The code ch
Changeset: 24d7f19e92a1
Author:alexsch
Date: 2012-10-22 13:16 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/24d7f19e92a1
7175707: [macosx] PIT: 8 b43 Not running on AppKit thread issue again
Reviewed-by: serb, anthony
! src/macosx/classes/sun/lwawt/macosx/CPlatformW
21 matches
Mail list logo
