On 07-11-2012 7:39 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Jayashree,
I can't find the review thread for this bug fix for JDK8. Do you have
a link to it ?
Also, can you follow the approval template format for future jdk7u
requests ? (esp. for subject line, it just helps to keep the mail
sorted for all of us.)
h
Hold up! This is a hotspot fix.
Staffan: hotspot fixes for 7u go in via hs24 and are then pushed to 7u
as a bulk update request.
David
On 8/11/2012 12:13 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
Please try and pre-append subject line with e.g [7u12] for future requests!
regards,
Sean
Many apologies for the delay sending this info
This afternoon I integrated hs24-b24 into jdk7u12 [1].
That integration includes the changes for JSR292 (invoke dynamic)
that were integrated into jdk8 back in August.
These changes require the hotspot and jdk repos to be in sync.
(hotspot and jdk r
hs24-b24 has been integrated into jdk7u12-b01.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/rev/3eddc50eb357
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/corba/rev/3f309ff1d8ec
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/hotspot/rev/0601ca30c7b4
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jaxp/rev/27bab008eee9
http://
Changeset: 4113d4a2c289
Author:jrose
Date: 2011-07-16 15:47 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/4113d4a2c289
6983728: JSR 292 remove argument count limitations
Summary: Remove workarounds and limitations from before 6939861.
Reviewed-by: never
! src/share/clas
Changeset: 3eddc50eb357
Author:jcoomes
Date: 2012-09-05 12:42 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/rev/3eddc50eb357
7196361: add hotspot/make/closed to hgforest.sh
Reviewed-by: ohair
! make/scripts/hgforest.sh
Changeset: 62c7660a9824
Author:asaha
Date: 2012-04-17 14:51 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot/rev/62c7660a9824
Merge
! .hgtags
Changeset: 8d07f4d6312d
Author:asaha
Date: 2012-04-19 09:58 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-d
Changeset: 2b43b06caea9
Author:leonidr
Date: 2012-11-07 19:44 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/2b43b06caea9
8002362: Build fails after integration of 7185280 to jdk7u-dev
Reviewed-by: anthony
+ src/share/classes/sun/awt/TimedWindowEvent.java
Hello Sean
Alexander,
you've used the subCR bug ID for this changeset. All changesets need
to contain the master bugID. Otherwise, we get different bug IDs
scattered all over the various JDK repos. This can't be reversed now
but please keep in mind for the future.
I was under impression th
You can clone a repository and issue
$ hg log -k
where is the bug number (e.g. 7193966). You can also try using
your favorite search engine and enter a query like this:
site:hg.openjdk.java.net
This should provide you with a list of changesets that mention the .
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 07/11/2012 15:17, Gordon, Bruce wrote:
I am new to the forum - can anyone tell me how to find which code changes
relate to a specific bug ?
In particular I would like to see the code change for
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7193966
Thanks!
That bug appears to be in the
Ok, I've cloned a fresh copy of jdk7u-dev repo, building it now with the fix
applied to make sure it builds fine. I'll push the fix when the build finishes.
On Nov 7, 2012, at 7:13 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Is the new file the same as that added to JDK 8 ?
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8
Alexander,
you've used the subCR bug ID for this changeset. All changesets need to
contain the master bugID. Otherwise, we get different bug IDs scattered
all over the various JDK repos. This can't be reversed now but please
keep in mind for the future.
regards,
Sean.
On 07/11/2012 14:49, a
Yes, in fact the original webrev approved by art and ant for 7u10
backport has included the file. It's just been missed in final `hg
commit` due to an absent `hg add` for this file.
Leonid: please consider this fix with the new file reviewed by AWT.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 11/7/2012 7:13
I am new to the forum - can anyone tell me how to find which code changes
relate to a specific bug ?
In particular I would like to see the code change for
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7193966
Thanks!
This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privile
Is the new file the same as that added to JDK 8 ?
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/0e007aa6f9db/src/share/classes/sun/awt/TimedWindowEvent.java
If so, can we have an awt reviewer review/approve the change? (You'll
need to add a reviewer to the 8002362 changeset Leonid)
Please ensure
Yes. I see that the webrev [1] mentions it. Please, push the missing
file. You can use my name as a reviewer.
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~leonidr/7185280/webrev.01/
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 11/7/2012 7:05 PM, Leonid Romanov wrote:
Would be k if I just push missing file without sending a
Would be k if I just push missing file without sending a review? I forgot to do
"hg add" on it when committing the fix into my local repo.
On Nov 7, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
> I just filed 8002362. Leonid, please take a look asap.
>
> --
> best regards,
> Anthony
>
> On 11/7/2
Hi All
This is a request to backport a jdk8 fix into jdk7u-dev:
7178649: TEST BUG: BadKdc3.java needs improvement to ignore the unlikely
but possible timeout
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7178649
Description.
The fix is already included in jdk8 as:
http://hg.open
Changeset: cb57b9274b64
Author:vkarnauk
Date: 2012-11-07 18:51 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/cb57b9274b64
2202276: Swing HTML parser can't properly decode codepoints outside the Unicode
Plane 0 into a surrogate pair
Reviewed-by: prr, rupashka
! src/
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
Please try and pre-append subject line with e.g [7u12] for future requests!
regards,
Sean.
On 07/11/2012 12:34, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Hi,
This is a request for approval to backport the fix for 8002078 from jdk8 to
jdk7u.
jdk8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hs
Jayashree,
I can't find the review thread for this bug fix for JDK8. Do you have a
link to it ?
Also, can you follow the approval template format for future jdk7u
requests ? (esp. for subject line, it just helps to keep the mail sorted
for all of us.)
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/
I just filed 8002362. Leonid, please take a look asap.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 11/7/2012 4:44 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
This is related to the 7185280 fix that was pushed yesterday.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/6f4e5e8f178d
Leonid (or team) - can you log a P1 bug and
This is related to the 7185280 fix that was pushed yesterday.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/6f4e5e8f178d
Leonid (or team) - can you log a P1 bug and fix asap ?
All code changes need to be build and tested before pushing.
Regards,
Sean.
On 07/11/2012 12:07, Anthony Petrov
Hi,
This is a request for approval to backport the fix for 8002078 from jdk8 to
jdk7u.
jdk8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/a1b8cf9cf970
jdk8 review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2012-October/007130.html
bug report: http://bugs.sun.com/bu
Hi All ,
Would like to back port the fix for 800743 , as it is broken from JDK7 .
The patch is same as JDK 8 .
JDK 8 Link
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/langtools/log?rev=8000743^
bug Link :
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8000743
Thanks and Regards,
Jayashree V
On 07/11/2012 12:05, jayashree viswanathan wrote:
Hi Alan ,
Thanks for your quick response . We are having the problem in JDK7U as
well . Do you mean that 7192849 was already fixed in JDK7U ?
It depends on which problem you are running into. The main issue in
7192849 has been addressed by 6
On 06-11-2012 5:36 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 06/11/2012 11:44, jayashree viswanathan wrote:
Hi All,
This is a request for approval to push the fix for 7132889 from JDK 8
to JDK7u .
Is this issue really causing a problem with jdk7u? I ask because the
main issue that was the original bug repor
Thanks for following up Chris/Sean!
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 07/11/2012 10:44, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Sean,
Sorry for the delay on this, and thanks for showing the impact with a
simple test. I'm ok with this change being backpored to 7u-dev.
-Chris.
On 26/10/2012 04:48, Sea
Sean,
Sorry for the delay on this, and thanks for showing the impact with a
simple test. I'm ok with this change being backpored to 7u-dev.
-Chris.
On 26/10/2012 04:48, Sean Chou wrote:
Hi Chris,
Attachment is the testcase and the image files.
/ testcase ///
Approved for 7u-dev.
On 11/01/2012 07:31 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
This is a request for approval to push the fix of 7163874 from jdk8
to jdk7u, could anyone take a look?
Link to the bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7163874
Webrev for jdk7u:
http://cr.openjdk.
31 matches
Mail list logo