Re: there is a bug in openjdk7.

On 8/08/2013 10:46 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: I'm not blaming you for anything. You have proposed a conspiracy theory about the 8014925 changeset, and I simply debunked it. It certainly seems like passing the blame when you redirect the reporter to our mailing list without first ascertaining whet

Re: there is a bug in openjdk7.

- Original Message - > On 8/6/13 5:30 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > I don't know if this is the right fix or not. > > Well, that seems to be the core of your problem. I guess someone will have to > investigate and find out if it is the right fix or not. > > > I'm just going by the littl

Re: [7u40] Review request for CR 8014925: Disable sun.reflect.Reflection.getCallerClass(int) with a temporary switch to re-enable it

- Original Message - > Hi, Mandy. > > This looks good. > > If you're still looking to shorten up the UOE, what about the following: > > Replace "namespace. Such methods are not" > > with "namespace so it is not"? > > Replace "As a temporary measure, the 7u40 release notes describe a me

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40/langtools: Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 21672c0e6691

Changeset: 81925e555c94 Author:asaha Date: 2013-08-07 12:10 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/langtools/rev/81925e555c94 Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 21672c0e6691 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40/jdk: Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 070b277e1b43

Changeset: 67e30ddcc6b3 Author:asaha Date: 2013-08-07 12:09 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/jdk/rev/67e30ddcc6b3 Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 070b277e1b43 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40/jaxp: Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 680bf140cdd5

Changeset: aa1a36b918b8 Author:asaha Date: 2013-08-07 12:09 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/jaxp/rev/aa1a36b918b8 Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 680bf140cdd5 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40/jaxws: Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 7ae2e9ed2c44

Changeset: 4af46770372d Author:asaha Date: 2013-08-07 12:09 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/jaxws/rev/4af46770372d Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 7ae2e9ed2c44 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40/corba: Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 8391dff270bb

Changeset: d7c73fd53c84 Author:asaha Date: 2013-08-07 12:09 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/corba/rev/d7c73fd53c84 Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 8391dff270bb ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40: Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 7d3e6ccad487

Changeset: a2ba8e069718 Author:asaha Date: 2013-08-07 12:08 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/rev/a2ba8e069718 Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 7d3e6ccad487 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk7u/jdk7u40/hotspot: Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 1f3b0ff9649c

Changeset: 74de360e3415 Author:asaha Date: 2013-08-07 12:09 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40/hotspot/rev/74de360e3415 Added tag jdk7u40-b38 for changeset 1f3b0ff9649c ! .hgtags

Re: [7u-dev] request for approval 8013809 deadlock in SSLSocketImpl between between write and close

On 8/7/2013 10:46 PM, Seán Coffey wrote: > Approved for jdk7u-dev. I see this fix just got pushed to jdk8/tl. It > might be good to let it soak there for a few days first. I'll let you > decide that. > I will integrate the change set next week. Thanks, Xuelei > regards, > Sean. > > On 07/08/13

Re: [7u-dev] request for approval 8013809 deadlock in SSLSocketImpl between between write and close

Approved for jdk7u-dev. I see this fix just got pushed to jdk8/tl. It might be good to let it soak there for a few days first. I'll let you decide that. regards, Sean. On 07/08/13 15:17, Xuelei Fan wrote: Hi, This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u-dev: 8013809: deadlock i

[7u-dev] request for approval 8013809 deadlock in SSLSocketImpl between between write and close

Hi, This is a request to backport a JDK 8 fix into JDK 7u-dev: 8013809: deadlock in SSLSocketImpl between between write and close The fix has already been pushed to JDK 8: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8c7cf4926157 The code changes for jdk7u are identical to the ones in jdk8

Re: [7u-dev] Request for backport approval: 8016834 (Underlines and strikethrough not rendering correctly)

On 07/08/13 12:55, Dalibor Topic wrote: On 8/7/13 1:20 PM, anton nashatyrev wrote: Hello, please approve the fix backport from jdk8 to jdk7u-dev. The patch was applied without any modifications. Approved for jdk7u-dev. On a side note, the correct bug URL is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bu

Re: [7u-dev] Request for backport approval: 8016834 (Underlines and strikethrough not rendering correctly)

On 8/7/13 1:20 PM, anton nashatyrev wrote: > Hello, > > please approve the fix backport from jdk8 to jdk7u-dev. The patch was > applied without any modifications. Approved for jdk7u-dev. On a side note, the correct bug URL is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8016834 - please use bu

[7u-dev] Request for backport approval: 8016834 (Underlines and strikethrough not rendering correctly)

Hello, please approve the fix backport from jdk8 to jdk7u-dev. The patch was applied without any modifications. Bug: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8016834 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emcherkas/anton/8016834/webrev/ Jdk8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/r

Result: New JDK 7 Updates Committer: Jaroslav Bachorik

Voting for Jaroslav Bachorik [1] is now closed. Yes: 8 Veto:0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. Congratulations Jaroslav! -- daniel [1]