Approved. Again, please add the appropriate noreg- label. (noreg-build)
regards,
Sean.
On 27/05/2014 23:00, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Requesting push approval for JDK-8042059. This fix has already gone
into both 9 and 8u20 and applies cleanly to 7u-dev.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/brows
Approved. Please add an appropriate noreg- label.
regards,
Sean.
On 27/05/2014 22:58, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Requesting push approval for JDK-8022070. This fix has already gone
into both 9 and 8u20 and applies cleanly to 7u-dev.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022070
Webrev:
Requesting push approval for JDK-8042059. This fix has already gone into
both 9 and 8u20 and applies cleanly to 7u-dev.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042059
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8042059-7udev/webrev.00/webrev/
Review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.
Requesting push approval for JDK-8022070. This fix has already gone into
both 9 and 8u20 and applies cleanly to 7u-dev.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022070
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8022070-7udev/webrev.00/webrev/
Review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.
Changeset: 14f15bdfffcb
Author:pliden
Date: 2014-05-20 10:24 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/hotspot/rev/14f15bdfffcb
8039042: G1: Phantom zeros in cardtable
Reviewed-by: tschatzl, mgerdin
! src/share/vm/gc_implementation/g1/g1SATBCardTableModRefBS.cpp
Approved.
regards,
Sean.
On 27/05/2014 12:20, Per Liden wrote:
Hi,
Requesting push approval for JDK-8039042. This fix has already gone
into both 9 and 8u20 and applies cleanly to 7u-dev.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039042
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/803904
Hi,
Requesting push approval for JDK-8039042. This fix has already gone into
both 9 and 8u20 and applies cleanly to 7u-dev.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039042
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8039042/webrev.0/
Review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotsp
Voting for Sergey Gabdurakhmanov to JDK7u Committer [1] is now closed.
Yes: 8
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient
to approve the nomination.
alexp
[1]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2014-May/009121.html