On 29/08/2014 04:20, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
Thanks Staffan!
Could I get a Reviewer too look at this as well please?
I got a question why the changesets didn't apply cleanly to jdk7, here
is a summary:
For the HotSpot part:
There were no aix or bsd-darwin mapfiles in jdk7.
For JDK:
The te
Changeset: f9b639e80e32
Author:msheppar
Date: 2014-10-01 17:01 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/f9b639e80e32
8058932: java/net/InetAddress/IPv4Formats.java failed because hello.foo.bar
does exist
Summary: changed hello.foo.bar to invalidhost.invalid
Rev
Approved pending 8 & 9 pushes.
-Rob
On 01/10/14 16:40, Seán Coffey wrote:
Seeking to push Mark's fix to jdk7u-dev also.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058932
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-October/008711.html
Simple patch will apply cleanly.
regards,
Sean.
Seeking to push Mark's fix to jdk7u-dev also.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058932
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-October/008711.html
Simple patch will apply cleanly.
regards,
Sean.
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Code changes generally require two approvals: codereview, performed by a
> > reviewer, (in this case from security-dev) and push approval, performed
> > by a gatekeeper. Given your email template matches the push approval
> > tem
