On Monday, June 29, 2015, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I'm looking at the existing rules for JDK 7 Updates, and I can't see
> much that I think should be changed. There are some process rules which
> we may not follow closely, and we should review them.
>
> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/jdk7u/J
* Andrew Hughes [2015-07-07 16:28]:
> Your idea about users is nice in theory, but it doesn't seem to work
> out in practice.
Can you elaborate? It seems to me like everyone who used the OpenJDK6
bug tracker was already an OpenJDK committer.
> How is this any different to what I proposed?
It's
- Original Message -
> * Andrew Hughes [2015-07-07 14:51]:
> > I'm working on the assumption so far that we'll use an OPENJDK7
> > instance equivalent to the one we did for OpenJDK 6. As you say,
> > access to the OpenJDK JIRA is limited and it would be difficult
> > for us to e.g. add mil
* Andrew Hughes [2015-07-07 14:51]:
> I'm working on the assumption so far that we'll use an OPENJDK7
> instance equivalent to the one we did for OpenJDK 6. As you say,
> access to the OpenJDK JIRA is limited and it would be difficult
> for us to e.g. add milestones, additional users, etc.
There
snip...
>
> Which bug database should we use? The OpenJDK JIRA is the obvious
> choice, but access is very limited. For OpenJDK 6 updates we have
> been using the database at https://java.net/jira/browse/OPENJDK6,
> which is much more accessible. Should we do the same for OpenJDK 7?
>
I'm wor
