Vote: yes
--Sean
On 08/05/2014 10:06 AM, Alexander Potochkin wrote:
I hereby nominate Anton Nashatyrev to jdk7u Committer.
Anton is a member of the Java SE sustaining team.
He has spent most of that time working on the GUI and deployment issues.
He has contributed 16 changes to jdk7u so far:
Looks good.
--Sean
On 07/11/2013 09:28 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
8019979 : Replace CheckPackageAccess test with better one from closed repo
I'd like to push this testcase enhancement to 7u40. It was pushed to
jdk8 TL repo earlier in the week. I've run tests via JPRT and saw no
issues. The packag
Changeset: c5d869453212
Author:mullan
Date: 2013-07-11 13:13 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u40-dev/jdk/rev/c5d869453212
8017173: XMLCipher with RSA_OAEP Key Transport algorithm can't be instantiated
Reviewed-by: xuelei, vinnie
!
src/share/classes/com/sun/org/apac
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8017173
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/8017173/webrev.00/
Review Thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2013-July/008112.html
This bug fix is needed because it is a serious regression introduced in
7u25 and
On 05/22/2013 02:25 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/7u/webrev/
Looks fine to me.
--Sean
There's an ambiguity that applies when building OpenJDK 7 with OpenJDK 6
(and hence I haven't posted this for 8 as it can't be built with 6).
OpenJDK 6 has a class
s
This is a request for a retroactive approval for the backport of the
following bug fix which was accidentally pushed to jdk7u-dev.
* Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7199143
* JDK 8 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/ee9846f351d7
Thanks,
Sean
This is a request for a retroactive approval for the backport of the
following bug fix which was accidentally pushed to jdk7u-dev.
* Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8011313
* JDK 8 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/78d08fc2dd12
Thanks,
Sean
This is a request for a retroactive approval for the backport of the
following bug fix which was accidentally pushed to jdk7u-dev.
* Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8013228
* JDK 8 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/3e282678a885
Thanks,
Sean
Vote: yes
On 02/22/2013 09:35 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I hereby nominate Edvard Wendelin to JDK 7 Updates Project Committer.
As one of this Project's Maintainers, Edvard has been active in this
Project since its creation. He has gradually accumulated the necessary
commits by contributing across
Changeset: b213a76d7189
Author:juh
Date: 2013-01-31 16:47 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/b213a76d7189
8002313: TEST_BUG :
jdk/test/java/security/Security/ClassLoaderDeadlock/ClassLoaderDeadlock.java
should run in headless mode
Reviewed-by: mullan
!
Changeset: c6d441f47bae
Author:juh
Date: 2012-12-11 14:33 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/c6d441f47bae
8004188: Rename src/share/lib/security/java.security to java.security-linux
Reviewed-by: mullan, mchung
! make/java/security/Makefile
- src/share/lib
Hi Vinnie,
Here are my comments.
* OCSPRequest
[119-20] Should use debug.println instead of System.out.println
* OCSPChecker
[386] why do you decrement remainingCerts? Is it identifying the wrong
certificate for some reason?
[473] Is this called by any other class? If not, I suggest making it
Changeset: e84d607e9b13
Author:mullan
Date: 2012-03-07 09:16 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4-dev/jdk/rev/e84d607e9b13
7146431: java.security files out-of-sync
Reviewed-by: vinnie, xuelei, wetmore
! src/share/lib/security/java.security-macosx
! src/share/lib/secur
This is a fix to correct an issue in 7u4 with the system-specific java.security
files being out-of-sync.
bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7146431
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/7146431/webrev.00/
The fix does not affect JDK 8.
Reviewed by Vincent Ryan a
On 2/28/12 11:21 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> [cc'ing security-dev@o.j.n, they may be able to suggest a suitable
> alternative, supported, API to use].
I would recommend they implement the functionality entirely in the OpenDS
product. X500Signer is a very simple class and can be implemented using t
Changeset: 6d17a729259d
Author:mullan
Date: 2012-01-24 11:27 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/6d17a729259d
7131084: XMLDSig XPathFilter2Transform regression involving intersect filter
Reviewed-by: xuelei
!
src/share/classes/com/sun/org/apache/xml/inter
This is a fix for a regression introduced in JDK 7.
bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7131084
Same patch as JDK 8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/3df0bd3ed880
Reviewed by Xuelei (Andrew) Fan:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2012-Jan
Changeset: 7617df64c231
Author:mullan
Date: 2012-01-13 09:47 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/7617df64c231
7094155: JSR105 code throws javax.xml.crypto.URIReferenceException when running
into Java 7 VM
Reviewed-by: xuelei
!
src/share/classes/com/sun/o
(Resending; fixed link to bug)
bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7094155
Same patch as JDK 8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/56cc907fc8dc
Integrated in b14 of JDK 8.
--Sean
bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7093090
Same patch as JDK 8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/56cc907fc8dc
Integrated in b14 of JDK 8.
--Sean
Changeset: fab771990eb3
Author:mullan
Date: 2011-11-30 14:48 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/fab771990eb3
7093090: Reduce synchronization in java.security.Policy.getPolicyNoCheck
Reviewed-by: valeriep
! src/share/classes/java/security/Policy.java
bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7093090
Same patch as JDK 8 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/1945abeb82a0
Thanks,
Sean
For non-Oracle developers, will there be a CCC template that developers can use
to write the details of the CCC and hand it off to the technical lead?
How do we manage comments that come up during the review of the CCC? Is the tech
lead expected to be a middle-man and send them back and forth to t
23 matches
Mail list logo
