On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:33 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Please approve and sponsor the following backpor
- Original Message -
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:33 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> >
On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 09:40 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:33 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
Changeset: ce1e160a991d
Author:sgehwolf
Date: 2016-04-11 15:03 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/ce1e160a991d
8153673: [BACKOUT] JDWP: Memory Leak: GlobalRefs never deleted when processing
invokeMethod command
Summary: Backed out changeset a47eba38b96e
Revie
> > > > Done: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/a47eba38b96e
> > > This fix has been backed out in 9[1] and is in progress of being backed
> > > out in 8[2] due to test regressions. I think we should do the same in
> > > 7. Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Severin
> > >
> > > [1]