On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
>>> patch either.
>>
>> In practice, from merging in ports, that is by far the best thing
>> to do. The history can be found in the development tr
Hi,
so I open a bug "PPC/AIX port for jdk7u" and description
"This change contains all changes for the ppc port from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u"
and just patch in all the diffs?
If I do this this week, is there a chance I can push this by 28.7.?
I'm on leave after that for 3 weeks.
Best regards,
Goetz
On 21/07/16 11:20, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> so I open a bug "PPC/AIX port for jdk7u" and description
> "This change contains all changes for the ppc port from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u"
> and just patch in all the diffs?
>
> If I do this this week, is there a chance I can push this by 28.7.?
> I'm on
Hi Andrew,
it's the same as in jdk9, except for the C1 port and maybe some recent
implemented
intrinsics. We'll continue downporting fixes. We supply the security fixes so
that
Oracle can push them for ppc right away, too. Sometimes processes are in the
way ...
Best regards,
Goetz.
>
On 21/07/16 14:29, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> it's the same as in jdk9, except for the C1 port and maybe some recent
> implemented
> intrinsics. We'll continue downporting fixes. We supply the security fixes
> so that
> Oracle can push them for ppc right away, too. Sometimes processes are in
HI Andrew,
it will basically be the same as in these webrevs.
I'll not do the tag changes, and skip the readme,
but besides that I don’t fell like changing too much.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/ppc-port/tree1/
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Haley
- Original Message -
> On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> >>> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> >>> patch either.
> >>
> >> In practice, from merging in ports, that is by far the best thing
> >> to do.
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> so I open a bug "PPC/AIX port for jdk7u" and description
> "This change contains all changes for the ppc port from ppc-aix-port/jdk7u"
> and just patch in all the diffs?
>
May I suggest doing a bulk import (single changeset) upto 9ee6abf28de9?
Looking at th
On 21/07/16 15:46, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>
> On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> patch either.
In practice, from merging in po
- Original Message -
> On 21/07/16 15:46, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 11/07/16 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>
> > On 11/07/16 15:28, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > I don't really want to lose all the history with just one huge
> > patch
On 21/07/16 16:52, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> As a compromise, I suggest doing a single patch for the main
> patch import (up to changeset 9ee6abf28de9) which corresponds
> to the whole port in the same way the initial AArch64 port was
> done, and gets rid of the problematic changesets.
>
> The remain
- Original Message -
> On 21/07/16 16:52, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > As a compromise, I suggest doing a single patch for the main
> > patch import (up to changeset 9ee6abf28de9) which corresponds
> > to the whole port in the same way the initial AArch64 port was
> > done, and gets rid of th
On 21/07/16 17:29, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> When backporting changes, you find differences between e.g. 7 and 8,
> and you need this kind of data mining, from tools like hg annotate, in
> order to establish why that change exists and whether or not it needs
> to be kept.
Yes, but I am still far from
- Original Message -
> On 21/07/16 17:29, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > When backporting changes, you find differences between e.g. 7 and 8,
> > and you need this kind of data mining, from tools like hg annotate, in
> > order to establish why that change exists and whether or not it needs
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
