Vote: yes
I hereby nominate Kurchi Subhra Hazra to jdk7u Committer.
Kurchi has committer role in the jdk8 project but only author role on
jdk7u.
The following queries match most of her recent activity:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/log?rev=khazra
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl
Hi All,
This has been integrated into jdk8 the changesets are:
[1] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7188114
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/3521fcad4b5f
went in cleanly into 7u-dev,
This one is a separated changeset, such that we can record
the attribution credits,
Hi,
Please review and approve webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7189944/webrev.0/
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7189944
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a44671e0b6d7
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-August/011074.html
Thanks
Kuma
intln(tr);
Other than that, thumbs up
- jjh
On 8/14/2012 12:58 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi All,
This has been integrated into jdk8 the changesets are:
[1] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7188114
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/3521fcad4b5f
went in cleanly in
a bug fix I
exchanged mail with you about earlier this year!
Ok
Approved.
modified webrev forthcoming
Thanks
Kumar
regards,
Sean.
On 15/08/2012 20:26, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Thanks Jim!
-
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7146424/webrev.0/src/share/bin/wildcard.c.frames.html
582 System.out.println(tr);
Other than that, thumbs up
- jjh
On 8/14/2012 12:58 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi All,
This has been integrated into jdk8 the changesets are:
[1] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7188114
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/
Hi David, Jim, Sean,
Thanks for the reviews etc.
Kumar
Hi Kumar,
Seems okay to me.
David
On 16/08/2012 9:17 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
This addresses Jim's comments (he is on vacation) anyone else wants to
review ?
Delta webrev since the last reviewed one.
http://cr.openjdk.jav
Vote: yes
I hereby nominate Alejandro Murillo to jdk7u Committer.
Alejandro is a performance engineer and also the HotSpot gatekeeper.
In the latter role he's responsible for delivering HotSpot sources
into jdk7 updates and other jdk releases; he's been working in this
role for nearly a year an
Hello Deven,
Looks good from a review standpoint, but you will need approval from
the 7u "powers" :)
Thanks
Kumar
Hi All,
This is a request for approval to push the fix of 7166955 from jdk8
to jdk7u, could anyone take a look?
Link to the bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?b
Hello,
Requesting approval for
The bug:
http://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8006574
The patch went in cleanly into 7u-dev and the patch is at:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ea8f3ca83501
Discussions:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-January/014148.html
T
Hello,
Request approval to push to jdk7u-dev, this causes false positives in the
nightly test runs.
Patch:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/da387f0cecb7
Main Bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8004042
Backport bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8009707
Patch applie
Hello,
Please approve push of the following changeset to jdk7u-dev/jdk
Bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8007333
Changeset (no changes):
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5e769206f036
Discussion:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/threa
Hello,
Please approve push to jdk7u-dev/langtools
Bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8014363
Bug(Backport):
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8016373
Changeset (no changes in jdk7u-dev/langtools) :
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/langtools/rev/e39669
Hi Michael,
Its hard to understand this webrev, having said that, what is going on
with this ?
-http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/vm/gc\-ergonomics.html¤ò»²¾È¤·¤Æ¤¯¤À¤µ¤¤¡£
-.br
-.br
+http://docs\&.oracle\&.com/javase/1\&.5\&.0/docs/guide/vm/gc\-ergonomics\&.html
+.sp
why
Hello,
Please approve backport bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028042
which is a backport of:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026794
the patch:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/ede89a97e80a
was discussed at:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-
Looks good but IIRC PPC also needs this.
Kumar
On 5/22/2014 1:13 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Please review the following change, destined for jdk7u-dev. The zip
implementation in unpack200 depends on _BIG_ENDIAN being defined on
big endian platforms, and the define is missing on the linux/spa
Hi,
Request approval for 7u2 push,
The bug description is here:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7073631
The changeset in jdk8 is here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/04f983e3e825
The changeset for 7u is identical to jdk8.
No issues found in nightly testing
Launcher changes:
I am not very happy about using #ifdef's in java.c
we had taken steps to ensure that all platform dependent
code, be removed from src/share/bin/java.c
but it is unfortunate to see conditionals have crept in.
My recommendation is to have SplashScreen as it is,
but for Macos hav
x27;t need to address those issues right
now.
They do all need to be addressed before any further osx code is merged
into the mainline repos for 8 or 7u.
Whew!.
Cheers, and Happy Holidays
Thank you and wish everyone here the same.
Kumar
David
On 24/12/2011 3:49 AM, Kumar Srinivasan
Hi,
Please approve,
CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7123392
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7123392/
Fixes for the launcher tests which fail with MacOSX and OpenJDK, a
precursor to
the re-factoring launcher work in progress.
Thanks
Kumar
Hi,
Please review the launcher refactoring work, the webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7124089/webrev.0/
Notes:
1. Moves the majority of the launcher code into platform specific
directories/files,
removed redundant conditionals.
2. The solaris/linux code co-exists togeth
oops missed setting the subject line to 7ux-osx.
Kumar
Hi,
Please review the launcher refactoring work, the webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7124089/webrev.0/
Notes:
1. Moves the majority of the launcher code into platform specific
directories/files,
removed redundant
n all
three platforms - solaris/linux, macosx, and windows. It makes sense
to define a function containing that code in the java.c and call it by
platform-specific JVMInit() implementations where needed.
Yes this can be done, I will look into it.
Kumar
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 1/17
out in a more sensible way.
Kumar
Like Anthony, I'm a bit concerned about the code duplications,
although generally the changes look good.
-Joe
On 1/17/2012 8:35 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi Anthony,
src/share/bin/java.c
987 } else if (IsMacOSX() && J
Hi Joe, Anthony,
Please see inlined comments
Hello,
On 1/17/2012 8:35 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi Anthony,
src/share/bin/java.c
987 } else if (IsMacOSX() && JLI_StrCmp(arg,
"-XstartOnFirstThread") == 0) {
988 ProcessSpecialArg(arg);
989
Kumar
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 1/17/2012 7:33 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
oops missed setting the subject line to 7ux-osx.
Kumar
Hi,
Please review the launcher refactoring work, the webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7124089/webrev.0/
Notes:
1. Moves the majority
Hi All,
Based on all the comments from Anthony, Joe and David,
here is the modified version:
Highlights:
1. re-factored code in solaris directory to be shared with macosx,
reducing duplication across the *nixes.
2. adjusted the makefilesto allow the above
2. eliminated all conditionals f
objective-c, I could guess
but would be better to document it in the makefile.
-kto
On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi All,
Based on all the comments from Anthony, Joe and David,
here is the modified version:
Highlights:
1. re-factored code in solaris directory to be s
e came up under the build project to document
coding conventions for makefiles, and *ahem* a jcheck for Makefiles
perhaps ?
One more webrev coming up, later today.
Kumar
-kto
On Jan 21, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi Kelly et. al.,
I have beautified/fixed the Makefiles addressi
x27;
does.
Please add a comment on what the -Os compiler option means, and also
the -x objective-c, I could guess
but would be better to document it in the makefile.
-kto
On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi All,
Based on all the comments from Anthony, Joe and David,
her
Hi,
This is a request to push the following fix to jdk7u-osx.
CR:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7124089
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7124089/webrev.3/
Reviewed by: anthony, darcy, dholmes, ohair
Thanks
Kumar
Hi All,
Request approval for push into
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk
Patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/96fe796fd242
CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7125442
Patch is identical to the jdk8, ie. no fuss by hg when applying.
Thanks
Kumar
Resending and including jdk7u-dev and John.
Thanks
Kumar
Hi,
Please review a simple fix to increase the residual memory
threshold between the pack/unpack iterations, on Macs for
whatever reason the residual memory exceeds by a mere 104K,
thus causing a false positive, I have verified the res
Hi
Request approval for push to http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/jdk
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7140989/webrev.0/
Reviewed by: jrose
Thanks
Kumar
Resending and including jdk7u-dev and John.
Thanks
Kumar
Hi,
Please review a simple fix to increase the residual memory
thre
On 2/3/2012 3:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:10, David Holmes wrote:
I am concerned. There was some discussion when various changes went
into 7u-osx regarding the suitability of the changes for inclusion in
the mainline repositories ie 7u-dev. It was my understanding that
there
On 2/3/2012 7:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/02/2012 15:28, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
On 2/3/2012 3:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:10, David Holmes wrote:
I am concerned. There was some discussion when various changes went
into 7u-osx regarding the suitability of the changes
Right now, JDK8 doesn't contain Mac OS X specific code, it cannot be
built or run on Mac, so I don't see how individual fixes can be
fw-ported. Instead, I would expect bulk migration from 7u to 8 similar
to what Michael/Alex did for macosx-port to 7u-osx and 7u-osx to
7u-dev.
The fixes I mad
According to the census [1] you have author role. This means you will need to
get someone to push the change-set for you.
OK. Any volunteers?
Ok, I will do the push.
Kumar
FYI, the webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gkbrown/7134730/webrev.01/
It was reviewed by Kumar Srinivasan
Hi Dalibor,
I will be pushing this on behalf of Balachandra shortly.
Kumar
This changeset doesn't seem to have been pushed yet.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 2/23/12 4:52 PM, Edvard Wendelin wrote:
Approved.
On Feb 22, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Balchandra Vaidya wrote:
Hi,
This is a request to appr
Vote: yes
I hereby nominate Mike Swingler (OpenJDK user name: swingler) to JDK7u
Committer.
I don't think any more information about Mike should be provided here,
we all know Mike's contribution to Java.
Votes are due by Mar 26, 2012.
Only current JDK7u Committers [1] are eligible to vote
Vote: yes
I hereby nominate Scott Kovatch (OpenJDK user name: skovatch) to JDK7u
Committer.
Many of us know Scott as a former member of Apple JDK team, and many
pieces of Mac OS X Port code were actually written by Scott long time
ago. He is now a member of development and client teams at O
It looks generally good, few comments, can be fixed for the
next release.
1. Standardize the terms JVM and HotSpot it seems to be used
interchangeably, good idea to fix them correctly for the next
release.
2. URLs ending with a "." may not work with some browsers depending on how
t
42 matches
Mail list logo
