Hi,
Please approve and sponsor the following fix for JDK-6425769 to 7u-dev.
It's a one-to-one backport from the fix which went into JDK 8 and JDK
9. What needed changing is the test to account for JDK 7 and
accompanying testlibrary. There were also two subsequent test fixes in
JDK 8/9 for which I
Hi,
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 13:38 -0500, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please approve and sponsor the following fix for JDK-6425769 to 7u-dev.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "sponsor". Do you mean you don't have commit
> access and need someone else to p
On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 13:16 -0500, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > Also, not sure why you need two URLs here? What is the difference between
> > > webrev (the one I review) and 'HG export'?
> >
> > Convenience. If you don't use the hg-exports, that's fine by me. Some
> > people prefer that over webrev
Hi,
Please approve and sponsor the following backport for JDK-4858370 to
JDK 7u-dev. It's the same patch as went into JDK 8. It only differs
from the 9 version in the test and in the same way as JDK 8's version
differed from 9.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4858370
webrev: http://
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please approve and sponsor the following backport for JDK-4858370 to
> > JDK 7u-dev. It's the same patch as went into JDK 8. It only differs
> > from the 9 version in the test and in the
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:33 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Please approve and sponsor the following backpor
On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 09:40 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:33 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
