Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Stephen, I've browsed around the links for Clover. It looks very interesting, but it's not clear to me the constraints under which it operates. Note that OpenJDK uses jtreg for the publicly available regression tests, and that many of the tests rely on being able to start up one or more new

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
These are the related links: Clover Unit Test Coverage http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Clover+Plugin Technical Debt http://www.sonarsource.org/evaluate-your-technical-debt-with-sonar/ Cheers, Steve. -Original Message- From: Stephen McConnell Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 3

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jonathan: I would like to see Sonar metrics for the following: 1.. unit test coverage 2.. technical debt I use Sonar on multiple internal projects and these two metrics mean a lot to me. Cheers, Steve. p.s. I can provide resources to help with the configuration if required. /SJM -Ori

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On 12/09/2011 08:40 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Seems we don't' have test coverage in place. Does anyone know if this is being put in place? Can you give more details on what you mean or would like to see here? -- Jon

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Artem Ananiev
Here is a link to original Sonar announcement at the discuss at openjdk.java.net alias: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2011-November/002204.html Artem On 12/9/2011 7:06 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Does anyone have a link to the Sonar page? Cheers, Steve. -Original Mes

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
Does anyone have a link to the Sonar page? Cheers, Steve. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Gibbons Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 1:22 AM To: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups Metrics are good, especially when you can see trend towards

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Metrics are good, especially when you can see trend towards a realistic goal ;-) -- Jon On 12/09/2011 06:48 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote: If Sonar is in place - then chances are we could enable a 'Technical Debt' metric. That would be interesting. Cheers, Steve. -Original Message- F

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Stephen McConnell
If Sonar is in place - then chances are we could enable a 'Technical Debt' metric. That would be interesting. Cheers, Steve. -Original Message- From: Alan Bateman Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 1:14 AM To: Martijn Verburg Cc: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Alan Bateman
On 09/12/2011 10:16, Martijn Verburg wrote: To add further to this, please send myself or Mike Barker any ideas you'd like to see tackled and we'll get them added to the list. There is an almost endless list of things that could be done. Along the lines of the warnings clean-up, then sorting th

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Georges Saab
This is something we intend to test out with the pilot instance of JIRA, see the following: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2011-October/000112.html /GES On 9 dec 2011, at 03:20, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: ... > Another fine thing would be to have an public reachable re

Re: Tests (Was Warnings Cleanup in java.util. (more from hack day))

2011-12-09 Thread Martijn Verburg
>> Thanks for the set-up instructions, between that and the jtreg site I >> was able to get them running. >> >> I'll probably have more specific questions later on, but in the mean >> time I'd like to be able to >> contribute some documentation steps so that especially when community >> enthusiasts

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Rémi Forax
On 12/09/2011 11:16 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Martijn, There were a number of surprises on Warnings Day last week. One was the amount of enthusiasm. Another was the difficulty of staying within the prescribed bounds, such as "no public API changes". Which brings me to a suggestion I've been me

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Martijn Verburg
>> Martijn, >> >> There were a number of surprises on Warnings Day last week. >> One was the amount of enthusiasm. Another was the difficulty of >> staying within the prescribed bounds, such as "no public API changes". >> >> Which brings me to a suggestion I've been meaning to make for a >> while,

Re: Summary: JDK8 Warnings Cleanup Day

2011-12-09 Thread Martijn Verburg
Glad to hear there was a good result out of it - we certainly learned a lot and had a good deal of fun as well! - M On 9 December 2011 04:56, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > Wow, most impressive! > > -- Jon > > > On 12/08/2011 08:12 PM, Xiomara Jayasena wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Last week we held [1] the

Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups

2011-12-09 Thread Martijn Verburg
>> Hi all, >> >> I think the experiment was pretty successful the other night and Mike >> and I have also figured out some ways to >> streamline the process even further for future events (pre-built VMs >> with the initial build already executed once >> work pretty well if you're running adequate h