hs23-b12 has been integrated into jdk8-b24.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/rev/1a5f1d6b98d6
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/corba/rev/b98f0e6dddf9
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/hotspot/rev/a80fd4f45d7a
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jaxp/rev/7836655e2495
http://hg.openjdk.
Changeset: 5f3fcd591768
Author:amurillo
Date: 2012-01-20 17:07 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/hotspot/rev/5f3fcd591768
7131979: new hotspot build - hs23-b12
Reviewed-by: jcoomes
! make/hotspot_version
Changeset: 53a127075045
Author:kvn
Date: 2012-01-20 09
I think the prerequisite for a port can not be that there exists
access to it on "x86 hardware".
With this constraint there will never be an OpenJDK port to other
architectures like PPC/Itanium/ARM to name just a few.
(By the way, there once upon a time was a mips -porting project
http://openjdk.j
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 01/02/2012 16:40, Steve Poole wrote:
>>
>>
>> I can see your point of view but the amount of work to support AIX is
>> much lower than that for Mac - so I don't see the need. You obviously have
>> some critieria in your head about port vs
On 01/02/2012 16:40, Steve Poole wrote:
I can see your point of view but the amount of work to support AIX is
much lower than that for Mac - so I don't see the need. You obviously
have some critieria in your head about port vs no port so I would be
interested to understand that in more deta
On 02/01/2012 05:37 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
I'll add this to the notes, thanks John.
On 31 January 2012 23:25, John Rose wrote:
It only strengthen's your already unassailable conclusion, but I'll add:
... may have a reference to an "enclosing instance" +[and/or references to
captured loca
On 1/31/2012 2:49 AM, Steve Poole wrote:
hi all,
Last year there was a discussion [1] about adding AIX platform
support into OpenJDK. I'd like to pick up that conversation and
complete this work.
To recap the salient points of the thread:
1: The scale of the changes to support AIX witho
On 01/02/2012 02:00, David Holmes wrote:
Stepping up a level I think we need to address the way we currently
arrange our sources and build files along OS/architecture lines before
trying to integrate any further ports into mainline (including the OSX
port that is currently off-to-the-side in 7u
On 31/01/2012 16:46, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 31/01/2012 10:49, Steve Poole wrote:
hi all,
Last year there was a discussion [1] about adding AIX platform
support into OpenJDK. I'd like to pick up that conversation and
complete this work.
To recap the salient points of the thread:
1: The s
I'll add this to the notes, thanks John.
On 31 January 2012 23:25, John Rose wrote:
> It only strengthen's your already unassailable conclusion, but I'll add:
> ... may have a reference to an "enclosing instance" +[and/or references to
> captured local variable values] ... anonymous classes have
Hi Stuart,
Thanks very much again for helping out on the day, it certainly saved
a few of the devs
from getting permanently stuck!
> Ah, it looks like you guys wrapped up while I was taking my lunch break. I
> hope your hack session was fun and productive.
It was! Mike (Michael Barker) is gathe
On 01/02/2012 15:02, Tobias Frech wrote:
Hi!
The following might be inappropriate here, but I found it very
surprising when I found out rt.jar contains platform specific code in
the classes that are part of the API. I would have expected all of these
special cases to be locked away in some sun.*
Hi!
The following might be inappropriate here, but I found it very
surprising when I found out rt.jar contains platform specific code in
the classes that are part of the API. I would have expected all of these
special cases to be locked away in some sun.* classes.
As I spoke to other developers abo
13 matches
Mail list logo
