Re: OpenJDK OOM issue -

to confirm why "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: > unable to create new native thread" error occurs? Many thanks. What OS is this? -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

Re: OpenJDK OOM issue -

: > unable to create new native thread" error occurs? Many thanks. Hard to say. If I had something I could reproduce and debug, I could tell you the answer in a few minutes. Otherwise it's going to be hard. strace might help. -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK L

Re: Coherent release process

- Original Message - > > > On 20.11.2015 04:39, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >> The corresponding Project's mailing list, jdk8u-dev, is the right place > >> to ask questions about JDK 8 Updates in OpenJDK. The JDK 8 Project has > >> completed its wo

Re: Coherent release process

his confusion. It's things like this that make OpenJDK confusing to new users and I don't see the necessity for it myself. Thanks, -- Andrew :) Senior Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 51

Re: Coherent release process

se, the OCA needs to be sorted first. There's not much point opening a bug with a patch if the patch can't be committed for legal reasons. > > Thanks for your time and consideration, > Quanah > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Platform Architect > Zimbra, Inc. > -

Re: openJDK bug filing?

ell enough with openJDK 1.7.x. If you create a Fedora bug with the best info you can about how to reproduce it we will then copy that info to an OpenJDK bug. Thanks, Andrew.

Re: where is the right place to submit bug reports?

On 12/27/2013 05:56 PM, Joe Darcy wrote: > Yes; unless you have author role or higher in OpenJDK, the bugs.sun.com > process is the most appropriate one. That is Very Bad Indeed. People who are not authors should be able to submit bugs to OpenJDK. Andrew.

Re: JDK 8 -> JDK 9

.net/pipermail/announce/2013-November/000156.html > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ > Do changes now have to go into 9 first or can they go straight to 8 still? -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indy

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Reviewer: Petr Pchelko

Vote: YES Thanks, Andrew On 11/19/2013 5:11 PM, Artem Ananiev wrote: I hereby nominate Petr Pchelko (OpenJDK user name: pchelko) to JDK8 Reviewer. Petr is one of the most active contributors to AWT and Swing. He is currently a JDK8 Committer, voting for JDK7u Committer is in progress

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Johnny Chen (jchen)

Vote: yes Thanks, Andrew On 10/22/2013 11:50 PM, Phil Race wrote: I hereby nominate Johnny Chen to JDK8 committer. Johnny has been working for the Java client team since the beginning of the year spending working on bugs in Java 2D in JDK 8 fixing security bugs and some OS X related issues

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Committer: Vadim Pakhnushev (vadim)

Vote: yes Thanks, Andrew On 10/22/2013 11:24 PM, Phil Race wrote: I hereby nominate Vadim Pakhnushev to JDK8 committer. Vadim has been working for the Java client team for over a year with a substantial amount of that time working on bugs in Java 2D in JDK 8. He has substantial background

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Reviewer: Anton Tarasov

Vote: Yes Thanks, Andrew On 8/2/2013 2:32 PM, Artem Ananiev wrote: I hereby nominate Anton Tarasov (OpenJDK user name: ant) to JDK8 Reviewer. Anton is currently a Committer in JDK7, 7u, 8, and OpenJFX projects. He is a member of AWT/Swing and JavaFX groups at Oracle, now working on

Re: java -version output for JDK8

our tests and scripts > would surely be less painful. > > Thanks, > Omair > No packages have ever shipped using "openjdk version", which is why I immediately noticed it as a regression. So the discussion is moot really. It's still going to get changed back in lo

Re: java -version output for JDK8

SE Runtime Environment JDK_RC_PLATFORM_NAME = Platform SE COMPANY_NAME = Oracle Corporation endif I spotted that someone seemed to have brought Frankenstein to life back in March and planned to fix it when I got time: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1348 -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07

Re: CFV : New jdk8 Reviewer : Brian Goetz

Vote:yes

Result: New OpenJDK 8 Reviewer: Omair Majid

Voting for Omair Majid [1] is now closed. Yes: 7 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of a Three-Vote Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-April/002267.html -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer

Re: CFV: New OpenJDK8 Reviewer: Omair Majid

on. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [4]. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/icedtea > [2] http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8 > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#reviewer-vote > -- > Andrew :) >

CFV: New OpenJDK8 Reviewer: Omair Majid

http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8 [4] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#reviewer-vote -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07

Re: New CPU & OS Platform System Properties

works. > > This would need a precise ABI specification at the ELF level, and ld.so > would have to reject loading ABI-incompatible DSOs. Yes, but we're already into the problem of ARM having insufficient flags in the DSO to identify compatibility. It's being fixed now, I believe, but there are a lot of systems out there. Andrew.

Re: New CPU & OS Platform System Properties

o the choice of binary to run. In many cases you can assume that if an arch supports VFPV3 it must also support VFP. But there are other things that control the selection of a binary, such as Thumb. Thumb 2 binaries don't run on Raspberry Pi. May I suggest a simple list of flags that indicate per-platform capabilities? Andrew.

Re: CFV: New JDK8 Reviewer: Sergey Bylokhov

Vote: YES Thanks, Andrew On 04.12.2012 18:13, Artem Ananiev wrote: I hereby nominate Sergey Bylokhov (OpenJDK user name: serb) to Reviewer in JDK8 project. Sergey is a member of AWT group at Oracle and committer in JDK6, JDK7, JDK7u, and JDK8 projects. He has contributed a number of very

Re: OpenJDK 8 and Fedora 17

27;t have problem to build OpenJDK7 on same Fedora 17 box. > > Anyone encountered this problem ? > I think you may be hitting this: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-March/004366.html -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Re: [jdk7-dev] On the build dependency upon gtk+

e via dlopen at runtime, so should be avoidable. All you actually need to build is the headers for CUPS. OpenJDK includes its own version of the Gtk+ ones. -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07

Re: LJC OpenJDK Warnings hack day

patches in sensible groupings and peer > pre-review the patches before sending them in. > > If there's anything we can do in particular to minimise the impact on > you > folks, please let me know. > > Cheers, > Martijn > -- Andrew :) Free Java Softwar

Re: JEP 138: Autoconf-Based Build System

On 02/21/2012 10:10 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/138 Nice. Does this project have a mailing list? Andrew.

Re: AIX and OpenJDK

e right thing to keep everything working. If a port isn't maintained it's deleted. This seems like a very sensible model, and I urge OpenJDK to adopt it. The big difference with OpenJDK is that so much of the build and test infrastructure is behind Oracle's firewall. And yes, I appreciate that's being worked on. Andrew.