on this page [1] for other
possibilities.
Thanks,
Iris Clark
[0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk8u-dev
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo
-Original Message-
From: Sven Reimers [mailto:sven.reim...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:40 AM
To
Hi, Martijn.
> Likewise - is it possible to get edit access?
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+build+platforms
That wikispace is owned by the Build Group, so all Members of that Group as
listed in the Census [0] should be able to edit the page.
Thanks,
iris
[0] http://open
pdate release occurs.
See the complete list of OpenJDK mailing lists is on this page [2] for other
possibilities.
Thanks,
Iris Clark
[0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/2d-dev
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jdk8u-dev
[2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/lis
> Iris -- As you create the initial JDK 9 forest, please tag the tip of each
> repository with "jdk9-b00". That will make it easy to identify the point at
> which the JDK 9 code line forked from JDK 8. Thanks.
Ok.
iris
Looks good to me.
Thanks for finding and fixing!
iris
-Original Message-
From: David Katleman
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 12:19 PM
To: jdk8-dev
Subject: Review request: JDK8 b98 source with GPL header errors
Below are corrections to GPL headers errors found in JDK8 b98
http
Looks fine to me.
iris
-Original Message-
From: David Katleman
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:21 PM
To: jdk8-dev; Miroslav Kos
Subject: Review request: JDK8 b96 source with GPL header errors
Below are corrections to GPL headers errrors found in JDK8 b96
http://cr.openjdk.java.n
The templates on the Project overview page were updated recently to correctly
indicate the voting method [1]:
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#project-reviewer
These kinds of updates don't occur frequently, but I recommend that everybody
always use the overview page templates as the source for
Hi, Dave.
They all look fine to me.
I looked at all of them looking for common errors. I was pleasantly surprised
that none of these involve huge numbers of files. (A missing ',' after the
copyright year is obviously the biggest problem.) Nice catch.
Thanks,
iris
-Original Message---