2012/11/7 3:14 -0800, t.p.elli...@gmail.com:
> Your note refers to JEP 121 and JEP 129, but the webpage update [1] has
> moved the target milestone for JEP 105 and JEP 121.
>
> I don't see any code for JEP 105, but may have missed it, and I see a
> commit related to JEP 129 [2].
>
> Please can yo
On 07/11/2012 12:06, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 11:14, Tim Ellison wrote:
>> :
>>
>> I don't see any code for JEP 105, but may have missed it
> Jon published a preview of the API and webrev on compiler-dev some time
> ago, see:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2012-Sep
On 07/11/2012 11:14, Tim Ellison wrote:
:
I don't see any code for JEP 105, but may have missed it
Jon published a preview of the API and webrev on compiler-dev some time
ago, see:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2012-September/004752.html
-Alan.
On 07/11/2012 00:01, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
> In all the excitement leading up to JavaOne I forgot to update
> the JDK 8 milestones page [1] to reflect the status of M4.
>
> Two JEPs targeted to M4 didn't quite make it:
>
> 121 Stronger Algorithms for Password-Based Encryption [2]
>
In all the excitement leading up to JavaOne I forgot to update
the JDK 8 milestones page [1] to reflect the status of M4.
Two JEPs targeted to M4 didn't quite make it:
121 Stronger Algorithms for Password-Based Encryption [2]
129 NSA Suite B Cryptographic Algorithms [3]
These have been retar
