On 09/12/2011 17:14, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Stephen,
I've browsed around the links for Clover. It looks very interesting,
but it's not clear to me the constraints under which it operates.
Note that OpenJDK uses jtreg for the publicly available regression
tests, and that many of the tests re
nical-debt-with-sonar/
Cheers, Steve.
-Original Message- From: Stephen McConnell
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 3:28 AM
To: Jonathan Gibbons
Cc: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups
Jonathan:
I would like to see Sonar metrics for the following:
3:28 AM
To: Jonathan Gibbons
Cc: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups
Jonathan:
I would like to see Sonar metrics for the following:
1.. unit test coverage
2.. technical debt
I use Sonar on multiple internal projects and these two metrics mean a lot
to me
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Gibbons
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 3:15 AM
To: Stephen McConnell
Cc: Artem Ananiev ; jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups
On 12/09/2011 08:40 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Seems we don't' have tes
On 12/09/2011 08:40 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Seems we don't' have test coverage in place. Does anyone know if this
is being put in place?
Can you give more details on what you mean or would like to see here?
-- Jon
Message- From: Jonathan Gibbons Sent: Saturday,
December 10, 2011 1:22 AM To: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re:
OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups
Metrics are good, especially when you can see trend towards a realistic
goal ;-)
-- Jon
On 12/09/2011 06:48 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
If
Does anyone have a link to the Sonar page?
Cheers, Steve.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Gibbons
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 1:22 AM
To: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups
Metrics are good, especially when you can see trend towards
al Message- From: Alan Bateman
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 1:14 AM
To: Martijn Verburg
Cc: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: OpenJDK adoption by Java User Groups
On 09/12/2011 10:16, Martijn Verburg wrote:
To add further to this, please send myself or Mike Barker any ideas
you'
K adoption by Java User Groups
On 09/12/2011 10:16, Martijn Verburg wrote:
To add further to this, please send myself or Mike Barker any ideas you'd
like to see tackled and we'll get them added to the list.
There is an almost endless list of things that could be done. Along the
lines o
On 09/12/2011 10:16, Martijn Verburg wrote:
To add further to this, please send myself or Mike Barker any ideas you'd
like to see tackled and we'll get them added to the list.
There is an almost endless list of things that could be done. Along the
lines of the warnings clean-up, then sorting th
This is something we intend to test out with the pilot instance of JIRA, see
the following:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2011-October/000112.html
/GES
On 9 dec 2011, at 03:20, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
...
> Another fine thing would be to have an public reachable re
On 12/09/2011 11:16 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Martijn,
There were a number of surprises on Warnings Day last week.
One was the amount of enthusiasm. Another was the difficulty of
staying within the prescribed bounds, such as "no public API changes".
Which brings me to a suggestion I've been me
>> Martijn,
>>
>> There were a number of surprises on Warnings Day last week.
>> One was the amount of enthusiasm. Another was the difficulty of
>> staying within the prescribed bounds, such as "no public API changes".
>>
>> Which brings me to a suggestion I've been meaning to make for a
>> while,
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think the experiment was pretty successful the other night and Mike
>> and I have also figured out some ways to
>> streamline the process even further for future events (pre-built VMs
>> with the initial build already executed once
>> work pretty well if you're running adequate h
Am 08.12.2011 22:38, schrieb Jonathan Gibbons:
On 12/08/2011 12:47 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,
I think the experiment was pretty successful the other night and Mike
and I have also figured out some ways to
streamline the process even further for future events (pre-built VMs
with the init
On 12/08/2011 12:47 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,
I think the experiment was pretty successful the other night and Mike
and I have also figured out some ways to
streamline the process even further for future events (pre-built VMs
with the initial build already executed once
work pretty well
Hi all,
I think the experiment was pretty successful the other night and Mike
and I have also figured out some ways to
streamline the process even further for future events (pre-built VMs
with the initial build already executed once
work pretty well if you're running adequate hardware).
We're kee
17 matches
Mail list logo
