On 04.12.2015 19:37, Andrew Hughes wrote:
I'm well aware of how things currently operate. However, in practice,
this causes confusion for those not working on OpenJDK every day and could
be improved.
We could archive mailing list of JDK Release Projects faster, I guess.
cheers,
dalibor topic
-
- Original Message -
>
>
> On 20.11.2015 04:39, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> The corresponding Project's mailing list, jdk8u-dev, is the right place
> >> to ask questions about JDK 8 Updates in OpenJDK. The JDK 8 Project has
> >> completed its work with the JDK 8 GA a while ago, so this list
On 20.11.2015 04:39, Andrew Hughes wrote:
The corresponding Project's mailing list, jdk8u-dev, is the right place
to ask questions about JDK 8 Updates in OpenJDK. The JDK 8 Project has
completed its work with the JDK 8 GA a while ago, so this list is
largely dormant.
Is there a good reason f
Trivial patches can be accepted without the provider being an OCA
signatory. However the patch must be provided using OpenJDK technology
so it can't be taken from an external website, but if small enough
should be included inline in an email message.
Thanks,
David
On 20/11/2015 1:45 PM, Quana
- Original Message -
> On 12.11.2015 04:42, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > if/when the OpenJDK project may develop a more coherent release plan?
>
> You can find the plans for JDK 9 at
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ . The plans for JDK 8 Updates are
> linked off the Project pa
--On Friday, November 20, 2015 1:51 PM +1000 David Holmes
wrote:
Trivial patches can be accepted without the provider being an OCA
signatory. However the patch must be provided using OpenJDK technology so
it can't be taken from an external website, but if small enough should be
included inline
--On Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:34 PM -0500 Andrew Hughes
wrote:
[Adding in the 8u mailing list]
- Original Message -
Hi,
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the follow up!
Actually, that won't get you u66 unless you explicitly check out a tag.
The current tip of 8u is currently receiv
[Adding in the 8u mailing list]
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if/when the OpenJDK project may develop a more coherent
> release plan? Right now, there seems to be no consistent strategy, which
> makes it very difficult for downstream consumers of OpenJDK to be able to
>
On 11/12/15 4:18 PM, Carlos de Luna Saenz wrote:
> I'm sure this topic has arise sooner here... but PPAPI is being considered...
> lot of oraganizations relies on Java applets for key based authentication and
> is a very important deal...
> If you can clear me on what's the future of applets fro
.Greetings
De: dalibor topic
Para: jdk8-dev@openjdk.java.net
Enviado: Jueves, 12 de noviembre, 2015 8:53:18
Asunto: Re: Coherent release process
On 12.11.2015 04:42, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> if/when the OpenJDK project may develop a more coherent release plan?
You can find the
On 12.11.2015 04:42, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> if/when the OpenJDK project may develop a more coherent release plan?
You can find the plans for JDK 9 at
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ . The plans for JDK 8 Updates are
linked off the Project page of the corresponding JDK 8 Updates Pro
11 matches
Mail list logo