Re: [tools-jdk] Reoccuring discussions arounds OOos Java usage
Hi, the box is up again and thus the link is working again, http://translation.services.openoffice.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/OOoJava , Martin Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Mark, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, [snip] "a reasonably complete list of OOo tools that require Java" would also be appreciated for our testing efforts against the current gcj builds. Martin hollmichel promised such a list in issue 18499, look at the bottom. Unfortunately the link is, at least for me, not working, but lets wait until next week. [snap] Cheers, Mark Kay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tools-jdk] Reoccuring discussions arounds OOos Java usage
Mark, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, [snip] "a reasonably complete list of OOo tools that require Java" would also be appreciated for our testing efforts against the current gcj builds. Martin hollmichel promised such a list in issue 18499, look at the bottom. Unfortunately the link is, at least for me, not working, but lets wait until next week. [snap] Cheers, Mark Kay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tools-jdk] Reoccuring discussions arounds OOos Java usage
Hi, A couple of quick notes. On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 16:58 +0200, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: > there seem to be reoccurring discussions regarding OOos Java usage, > e.g. see > > http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html Richard Stallman asked me about the progress and said he would update the page based on my feedback. > http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=dev&msgNo=13179 "a reasonably complete list of OOo tools that require Java" would also be appreciated for our testing efforts against the current gcj builds. > I would appreciate, if you can provide the latest state of the GCJ > builds and if there are any obstacles left, which can not easily be > fixed by some lines of code. We are certainly willing, and it will be a > pleasure, to help and to work together with you to sort these issues out. Caolan is on vacation as far as I know, but Thomas Fitzsimmons should have the same list of open items as he had, so I CCed him. Cheers, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[tools-jdk] Reoccuring discussions arounds OOos Java usage
Guys, there seem to be reoccurring discussions regarding OOos Java usage, e.g. see http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=dev&msgNo=13179 I am really convinced, that we did everything to enable anybodies Java (even none at all), by a) defining OOos Java usage policy (see http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=jdk&msgNo=90 ) b) by implementing the Java Vendor framework (see http://udk.openoffice.org/common/man/spec/javavendorextension.sxw ) c) by providing help when needed in respect to some legacy code, which partly makes use of some undocumented sun classes and d) by certainly ensuring that OOo even runs without Java properly (e.g. Java can be deselected during the build process, leaving out Java based features, e.g. applets) I would appreciate, if you can provide the latest state of the GCJ builds and if there are any obstacles left, which can not easily be fixed by some lines of code. We are certainly willing, and it will be a pleasure, to help and to work together with you to sort these issues out. Please follow up on jdk@tools.openoffice.org Thanks in advance Kay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
