Re: Dependencies between ri11 runtime and r11 query

Hi Michael, Thanks for this analysis. On Apr 28, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Michael Watzek wrote: Hi, Micheal Bouschen raised the issue to get rid of the compile time dependencies between ri11 runtime and ri11 query. The benefit would be: 1) Runtime and query could be separated into 2 different projects

Re: Collections of interfaces

Hi Andy, After I wrote the message I realized I had no idea what I was talking about. On Apr 29, 2005, at 12:33 PM, Andy Jefferson wrote: http://java.sun.com/dtd/jdo_2_0.dtd";>     So is it sufficient that the SimpleInterface metadata be ahead of the SimpleClass metadata in the .jdo file

Re: Collections of interfaces

> > Metadata 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/jdo_2_0.dtd";> > > > objectid-class="org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.SimpleClass$Oid"> >     > > > > > So is it sufficient that the SimpleInterface metadata be ahead of the > SimpleClass metadata in the .jdo file? What "SimpleInterface"

Re: Collections of interfaces

Hi Andy, This is great news! One question below. On Apr 29, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: I expect that to remove the JPOX extension, we will add the tag as follows: Metadata 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/jdo_2_0.dtd";> objectid-class="org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.Sim

Re: Collections of interfaces

> Is it still required to use "implementation-classes" with a persistent > field defined as an interface? No. provides the default list of classes implementing an interface field, so you could just use that. "implementation-classes" is there so that people can define (if they want) that a part

Re: Collections of interfaces

Andy Jefferson wrote: I expect that to remove the JPOX extension, we will add the tag as follows: Metadata 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/jdo_2_0.dtd";> objectid-class="org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.SimpleClass$Oid"> Craig/Michelle, I've added support for to JPOX CVS -

RE: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, April 29, 9 am PST

Hi, I hereby enumerate my experience and issues I had running the TCK: - schema is not fully created with the existing DDL script, so the implementation needs to create it at runtime or pre-runtime. Note: JPOX can do it at runtime or pre-runtime. - BigDecimal tests use equals to assert the value

Re: Collections of interfaces

> I expect that to remove the JPOX extension, we will add the > tag as follows: > > Metadata 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/jdo_2_0.dtd";> > > > objectid-class="org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.SimpleClass$Oid"> > > > > > Craig/Michelle, I've added support for to JPOX CVS -

pmf not closed

Hi, Michael, When you get a chance to look at the tests that don't close pmf when they fail, the JIRA number is JDO-32. Thanks, Michelle

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, April 29, 9 am PST

Okay, Brian. Thanks for the report. I hope everything works out okay. -- Michelle Brian Topping wrote: Hi gang, I'm not going to be making it today, been having significant issues getting anything done this week and need to spend the day tomorrow at hospital(s) for family members. I'll be try

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, April 29, 9 am PST

Hi gang, I'm not going to be making it today, been having significant issues getting anything done this week and need to spend the day tomorrow at hospital(s) for family members. I'll be trying to get my list taken care of this weekend though. best, Brian Michelle Caisse wrote: Hi, We will have ou