Title: Message
Hi
guys,
I don't want to
get anyone's hopes up too high, but I am starting to get some source in place to
the point that I don't want to have to recreate it if I lost it. I'd like
to commit my changes, but I still don't have my knighthood. Can someone
prod someone else su
Hi Michael,
Nice work!
There are no major issues that I see with the patch. Can you please
make sure that the internal tests as well as the tck tests run with and
without security? And see if Michael can check in the code for you. If
not, let me know and I'll do it.
In PersistenceManagerImpl ca
Hi Craig,
I filed a JIRA issue (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-36) on
the query factory prososal below. That proposal solves issue 2) below.
Attached you find an implementation for that issue which passes the ri11
testsuite. I attached four files containing the implementation:
- rio.p
Hi Christian,
The DetachOnClose property would only be triggered by the close of the last wrapper on the real persistence manager. So I don't think that this is the issue.
The issue as you have pointed out before is that in a managed environment there is some uncertainty whether the PM is still o
Hi Matthew,
as pointed out in previous discussions, this property won't really work in
a managed environment.
(as the close() is not really a JDO-close(), but invalidates one handle)
Best regards,
Christian
"Matthew T. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/05/2005 23:10
