> FieldsOfObject still doesn't work. JDO-120. AI: Need feedback from
> Erik or Andy.
Feedback : TestFieldsOfObject.java is not correct. It's still trying to use
Object values that are String, and Integer even though the metadata is now
specifying that the "implementation" of the Object field is
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Michael Watzek, Martin Zaun, Karan Mahli, Craig RussellAgenda:1. Test status (Michael, Michelle) Application identity 396 tests 17 failures 24 errors Datastore identity 16 failures 25 errors. Open JIRA bugs: 17.FieldsOfObject still doesn't work. JDO-120
Hi Craig,
> I've enhanced the spec as follows:
> The embedded attribute specifies whether the field should be stored
> as part of the containing instance instead of as its own instance in
> the datastore. It must be specified or default to "true" for fields
> of primitive types, wrappers, java.lan
Thanks Michael,
Will try again later.
Michael Watzek wrote:
Hi Karan,
I get the same error. Probably svn is currently offline. You may try
later again.
Regards,
Michael
Hi,
Is there a problem with the svn repository. I am trying to checkout a
fresh copy on my laptop and i get the error
Hi Andy,
Thanks for your thoughtful insights here.
It appears we are in sync for supporting field types of Object as
FCO, and now we're discussing support for Object as SCO (embedded).
On Aug 17, 2005, at 11:26 PM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
Hi Craig,
Well we interpret all types as serialize
Hi Karan,
I get the same error. Probably svn is currently offline. You may try
later again.
Regards,
Michael
Hi,
Is there a problem with the svn repository. I am trying to checkout a
fresh copy on my laptop and i get the error message that
http://svn.apache.org cannot be contacted.
Then i
Hi,
Is there a problem with the svn repository. I am trying to checkout a
fresh copy on my laptop and i get the error message that
http://svn.apache.org cannot be contacted.
Then i tried to view the repository online at
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/incubator/jdo and i get the same error.
-
Hi Michael,
Hi Michael,
what do you think about the proposal adding a summary file for the tck
run results? Is this hard to be implemented?
I like that idea! See my first reply.
Some questions/comments about the patch:
TCKFileAppender.java:
- I'm just curious: do we need the four differen
Hi Michael,
Hi Michael,
I like the proposal. I added a few comments plus a suggestion for an
extension below.
Hi,
during last t-conference we discussed to improve logging of TCK runs.
Below, you find a summary of our discussion. Please comment!
Current state:
Separate log files are written