[jira] Commented: (JDO-161) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning variables.

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-161?page=comments#action_12355946 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-161: -- Some comments: datastoreidentity/schema.sql: - The patch replaces table JDOQLKeywordsAsFieldNames with table NoExtent. instad of

[jira] Commented: (JDO-162) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning other language changes.

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-162?page=comments#action_12355947 ] Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-162: -- Some comments about the patch CharacterAndStringLiterals.java: - I propose to change the filter of the invalid query to charNotNull

Re: Assertion A14.6-21 (Query.getFetchPlan)

2005-10-26 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Michael, Craig On Oct 25, 2005, at 5:55 AM, Michael Watzek wrote: Hi Craig, Hi Michael, The relevant bit of the specification is regarding jdoPostLoad. A10.1-2 [This method is not modified by the enhancer.] So whatever is done in jdoPostLoad, the implementation will not be called

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-98) TestArrayCollections: Field ArrayOfBigDecimal13 in class ArrayCollections has been defined with elements that arent embedded. JPOX doesnt support this

2005-10-26 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-98?page=all ] Michelle Caisse reassigned JDO-98: -- Assign To: Craig Russell (was: Michelle Caisse) What metadata can be used so implementation can map this? TestArrayCollections: Field ArrayOfBigDecimal13 in

Re: Apache JIRA : project JDO - disappearing issues

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Bouschen
Hi, the problem seems to be fixed. The All list now shows all the 192 JDO issues again. Regards Michael I see the same thing. Very weird. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, some news: the two issues Andy resolved yesterday (JDO-170 and JDO-174) are back on the list. But now a

Re: Issue 133: TCK : Map tests

2005-10-26 Thread erik
Quoting Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The only other interpretation that I would support is to literally do what Java does: for these specific type names (String, Integer, etc. list of 10 names), look first in the named package for the type, and if not found, go to java.lang to resolve

Re: Issue 133: TCK : Map tests

2005-10-26 Thread Andy Jefferson
The only other interpretation that I would support is to literally do what Java does: for these specific type names (String, Integer, etc. list of 10 names), look first in the named package for the type, and if not found, go to java.lang to resolve them. I like better this I do too, and

[jira] Created: (JDO-193) Need new test cases for Map where there is no join table; the key is a field of the value type or the value is a field of the key type

2005-10-26 Thread Craig Russell (JIRA)
Need new test cases for Map where there is no join table; the key is a field of the value type or the value is a field of the key type --- Key: JDO-193

Re: TCK : Map tests

2005-10-26 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Andy, On Oct 23, 2005, at 2:25 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: Hi Michelle, I've been through the issues with the various TCK Map tests, and have the following comments :- 3. JPOX also supports Maps where there is no join table and the key is a field in the value class. Is there a TCK

[jira] Updated: (JDO-163) Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning query API Extensions

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Watzek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-163?page=all ] Michael Watzek updated JDO-163: --- Attachment: JDO-163.patch The attached patch implements the assertions above. Implement new JDO 2 query tests cases concerning query API Extensions

JIRA JDO-190

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Watzek
Hi Craig, you filed JIRA http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-190 which has no component. Probably it should be tck20. Regards, Michael -- --- Michael Watzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL

Help me understand this

2005-10-26 Thread karan malhi
Hi, I was looking at AllOtherTests on the wiki. I looked at A8.3-11 which is filed as JDO-188 on JIRA. My understanding is that since A8.3-11 is an assertion for JDOHelper, so the methods static Object[] getObjectIds (Object[] pcs); static Collection getObjectIds (Collection pcs); should

Re: JIRA JDO-190

2005-10-26 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Michael, Thanks for the reminder. I've updated it. Craig On Oct 26, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Michael Watzek wrote: Hi Craig, you filed JIRA http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-190 which has no component. Probably it should be tck20. Regards, Michael --