Hi,
These questions need immediate answers:
1. Should we plan for a release 3.2.1 and create a new branch for 3.2.1 (both
db-jdo and db-jdo-site) for issue JDO-806?
2. Should we use 3.2 as the xsd and dtd version numbers since there are no
changes planned for them in 3.2.1?
3. Should we use htt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17512640#comment-17512640
]
Craig L Russell commented on JDO-806:
-
This question on stackoverflow seems to be releva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17512636#comment-17512636
]
Craig L Russell commented on JDO-806:
-
Should the headers in the xsd and dtd files chang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig L Russell updated JDO-806:
Description:
In JDO 3.2 the schemaLocation of JDO XSDs link to
[http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/jdo/] whe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17512445#comment-17512445
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-806:
Missing jdoconfig.xsd, jdoconfig.dtd ?
> Use apach
Hi Craig,
no, I think this is an oversight. So both files jdoconfig_3_2.xsd and
jdoconfig_3_2.dtd should be available in the xmlns directory
Regards Michael
Hi,
Is there a reason to not include jdoconfig definitions in the xmlns directory?
Regards,
Craig
Craig L Russell
javadog@gmail.