[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-402?page=comments#action_12424399 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-402:
The spec isnt totally silent (12.7.5 comment line in the code for getGroups).
Erik asked the question on the mailing list on
JDO2 Annotations
Key: JDO-403
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403
Project: JDO
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: api20
Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
Deletion of objects when foreign-key is present : unexpected DB exceptions now
handled
--
Key: JDO-392
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-392
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-392?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson updated JDO-392:
---
Summary: Deletion of objects when foreign-key is present : unexpected DB
exceptions not handled (was: Deletion of objects when foreign-key is present :
unexpected
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-386?page=comments#action_12416054 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-386:
Hi Craig,
what we do with JPOX to get it in the jar is add it in the resources section
under build in project.xml like this
build
SQL query : executeWithMap test
---
Key: JDO-378
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-378
Project: JDO
Type: Test
Components: tck20
Versions: JDO 2 final
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
Priority: Minor
Fix For:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-375?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson updated JDO-375:
---
Attachment: jpox-enhancer-SNAPSHOT.jar
jpox-SNAPSHOT.jar
Attached are jars built from JPOX CVS HEAD. I can confirm the fix works and
have run the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-298?page=comments#action_12372633 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-298:
Hi Michelle,
thanks for updating the javadocs.
Are you sure they reflect 2.0-final ? I looked at javax.jdo.FetchPlan and see
that
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-298?page=comments#action_12372639 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-298:
Hi Craig,
Looks fine now! Thanks.
Update javadoc to be consistent with 2.0-beta
-
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12372223 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
No problem Martin. It should all be built into the current JPOX nightly build
and passes for me with latest SVN TCK
JPOX fails some
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12372060 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
With the latest integration of a fix for JDO-273, there's one lifecycle test
failing: serialize with
optimistic tx should leave the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-347:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in JPOX CVS
JPOX fails some lifecycle tests
---
Key: JDO-347
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371852 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
Test StateTransitions now passes with JPOX CVS
JPOX fails some lifecycle tests
---
Key: JDO-347
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371865 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
I would like some input into StateTransitionsReturnedObjects. Let's take this
message :-
[java] Assertions A5.9-1 through A5.5.8
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371779 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
I would like to know what the StateTransitionsReturnedObjects tests are
performing. They state errors like
[java] Assertions A5.9-1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-346?page=comments#action_12371559 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-346:
When I do a clean check out and then run the TCK, when it is running
lifecycle.conf I get an error
Cannot find test class
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371574 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
For information : JPOX CVS cuts the long list of failing transitions attached
to this issue down to
[java] Assertions A5.9-1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-347?page=comments#action_12371594 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-347:
org.apache.jdo.tck.lifecycle.StateTransitionsReturnedObjects :-
This test seems to think that calling detachCopy on a detached instance
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-343?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-343:
--
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
JPOX regression: after deserializing a detached instance, the instance is
transient
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-343?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-343:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in JPOX CVS ... again. RIP.
JPOX regression: after deserializing a detached instance, the instance is
transient
Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO implementation supports
javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable
---
Key: JDO-311
URL:
Add makeTransient(Object, boolean) to PersistenceManager
Key: JDO-306
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-306
Project: JDO
Type: Task
Components: api20
Versions: JDO 2 beta
Reporter:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-288?page=comments#action_12366540 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-288:
Hi Michael,
JPOX CVS has those methods. Check in at will. The latest downloadable JPOX
nightly build has an error in the scope of some
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-306?page=comments#action_12366594 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-306:
JPOX CVS has the new methods. The latest nightly build should be fine.
Add makeTransient(Object, boolean) to PersistenceManager
Update javadoc to be consistent with 2.0-beta
-
Key: JDO-298
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-298
Project: JDO
Type: Task
Components: site and infrastructure
Versions: JDO 2 beta
Reporter: Andy
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-285?page=comments#action_12365104 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-285:
Hi Michael,
can you please provide a cut down guide on what the first of these problems is?
What are you calling exactly ? The stack
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-289?page=comments#action_12365046 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-289:
FYI. The C3P0 (and DBCP) plugins were updated to add an extra parameter to
their constructor, allowing specification of a configuration
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-249?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-249:
--
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
JPOX throws JDOFatalInternalException for queries using new MyClass(...) in
result clauses
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-249?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-249:
Resolution: Fixed
Gone to meet its maker. Fixed in JPOX CVS - builds dated 09/01/2006 or later
should have this.
JPOX throws JDOFatalInternalException for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-263?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-263:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in JPOX CVS - builds dated 08/01/2006 or later. :-)
TestArrayCollections: Field ArrayOfBigDecimal12 is stored incorrectly
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-247?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-247:
--
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
JPOX must throw JDOUserException for queries using incompatible result
classes.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-247?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-247:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in JPOX CVS - builds dated 08/01/2006 or later should have this.
JPOX must throw JDOUserException for queries using incompatible
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-251?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-251:
Resolution: Fixed
Rest in Peace. Fixed in JPOX CVS - builds dated 08/01/2006 or later should have
this fix.
JPOX generates illegal SQL for queries using
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-263?page=comments#action_12361984 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-263:
You say that your patch changes the results to those you show in 04 Jan. Well
if I round the numbers (that current SVN gives and that I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-245?page=comments#action_12361581 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-245:
I look at the test Having.testNegative and the query is now
SELECT department, SUM(salary) FROM Employee GROUP BY department HAVING
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-245?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-245:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
Thanks for your reply Michael. Let's leave the test as it is ;-)
Now fixed in JPOX CVS
SingleStringQuery has a query accessing a field in a subclass
-
Key: JDO-271
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-271
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
Components: tck20
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-270?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-270:
Resolution: Fixed
Another one bites the dust. Fixed in JPOX builds dated 04/01/2006 or later
JPOX must thrown JDOUserException for a query accessing a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-248?page=comments#action_12361484 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-248:
The test has a query SELECT phoneNumbers FROM FullTimeEmployee INTO
java.util.Map
where phoneNumbers is a Map field.
The test seems to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-253?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-253:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
Fixed in JPOX CVS - builds 02/01/2006 or later.
JPOX generates illegal SQL for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-240?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-240:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
JPOX CVS now has support for COUNT(DISTINCT ...), AVG(DISTINCT ...),
SUM(DISTINCT
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-268?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-268:
Resolution: Fixed
attachCopy() just met a horrible death in JPOX CVS. There'll be a short service
later to commemorate its brief life (don't send any
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-267?page=comments#action_12361314 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-267:
Any clue as to which TCK test this refers to ? The test class name would be
nice.
Query with alias result generates incorrect SQL
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-72?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-72:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
Fixed in JPOX CVS - builds dated 29/12/2005 or later.
Now returns 3 nested exceptions,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-220?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reopened JDO-220:
Reopen issue since it failed to move to Resolved when asked to yet no longer
shows the Resolve Issue option ... Apache JIRA problem by the look of it
JPOX
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-265?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-265:
Resolution: Duplicate
Dup of JDO-248
JPOX throws exception if default (empty) SELECT clause
--
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-244?page=comments#action_12361095 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-244:
Looked at the SQL being generated ?
JPOX generates illegal SQL for having clauses using COUNT.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-72?page=comments#action_12361030
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-72:
---
Current support is for date-time, and version-number.
Test api.persistencemanager.OptimisticFailure hangs
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=comments#action_12361036 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-194:
Thanks for the stack trace Michael. Seems that some Windows JREs sometimes
throw a NoClassDefFoundError and Unix JREs dont - nice
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-263?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-263:
--
Assign To: Michelle Caisse (was: Andy Jefferson)
Changed JPOX to support this element-type attribute. You now have
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=comments#action_12360941 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-194:
And I have a clean checkout of about 30 mins ago and still get no errors
whatsoever on those tests. Perhaps something in your setup ? I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=comments#action_12360959 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-194:
JPOX would have to check for whether something is a class or not before falling
back to implicit variable. As for which variable
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-255?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-255:
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of JDO-255.
Please refer to http://www.jpox.org/servlet/jira/browse/CORE-2610 for details
Inheritance mapping 1 fails for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=comments#action_12360653 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-256:
Please refer to http://www.jpox.org/servlet/jira/browse/CORE-2610 for details.
No point us duplicating details across 2 JIRA systems.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-256:
--
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
Inheritance mapping 1 fails for datastore identity.
---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-255?page=comments#action_12360654 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-255:
That should have read, duplicate of JDO-256 :-)
Inheritance mapping 1 fails for application identity.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-241?page=comments#action_12360498 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-241:
If you look at the test you find that the candidate collection passed in is
of transient instances which hence have no identity (or at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-220?page=comments#action_12360512 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-220:
The second of the fields (number2) is checked that it is not loaded. So what
about the case where the object has been pulled from the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-261?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-261:
--
Assign To: Michelle Caisse (was: Andy Jefferson)
Well if you look at the message received
Add request failed : INSERT INTO
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-243?page=comments#action_12360413 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-243:
OK, so lets take this one step further then. I look at SingleStringQuery
test. It requires a query with a result clause, an ordering
TestHashMapStringKeyCollections.test : schema incorrect
---
Key: JDO-260
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-260
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
Components: tck20
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
Assigned to:
TestHashSetCollections, TestSetCollections : schema incorrect
-
Key: JDO-261
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-261
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
Components: tck20
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=comments#action_12360294 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-256:
Any chance of a clue as to what data has changed ? Something to do with
medical and dental insurance ? Wading through this object model
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-239?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-239:
--
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
JPOX throws NPE when result class is specified with no result clause for
deletion by query using single
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-239?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-239:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in JPOX CVS. Builds from 14/12/2005 will have this.
JPOX throws NPE when result class is specified with no result clause for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-243?page=comments#action_12360312 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-243:
Why ? Is it not allowed for the JDO implementation to interpret that fields in
the result should be automatically added to the grouping
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-227?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-227:
--
Assign To: Michelle Caisse (was: Andy Jefferson)
Hi Michelle,
I too was confused by the error message :-), until I looked in the JPOX log.
The ORM file has
DistintCandidateInstances.testCollectionQueries typo
Key: JDO-226
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-226
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
Components: tck20
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
Assigned to: Michael
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-194:
Resolution: Fixed
This test passes and has for a week at least
JPOX does not support implicit variables.
-
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-177?page=comments#action_12358491 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-177:
To be explicit, this only relates to queries where JDOHelper.getObjectId(this)
is in the result clause. When it is in the filter clause
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-177?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-177:
--
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
JPOX ignores JDOHelper.getObjectId in queries.
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-177?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-177:
--
Assign To: Michael Watzek (was: Andy Jefferson)
JPOX CVS has been updated to support JDOHelper.getObjectId in the result
clause. It now shows up an error in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-211?page=comments#action_12358175 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-211:
I see that the MetaData is now, for example
field name=HashMapOfObject_String3 table=HASHMAP_OBJECT3_STR
join column=IDENTIFIER/
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-215?page=comments#action_12358181 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-215:
I see that the MetaData is now, for example
field name=HashSetOfObject1 table=HASHSET_OF_OBJECT1
join column=IDENTIFIER/
element
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-211?page=comments#action_12357480 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-211:
Hi Michelle,
I'm not convinced that it's a JPOX bug here. I'll explain why
Let's take the example of MapStringValueCollections, and its
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-207?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-207:
Resolution: Fixed
JPOX was imposing a column name length restriction of 30 (for compatibility
with DB2 and Derby's previous incarnation - Cloudscape). This
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-172?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-172:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
JPOX CVS supports use of the setGrouping() method, and also specification of
HAVING
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-194?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-194:
--
Assign To: Michael Watzek (was: Andy Jefferson)
JPOX CVS does now implement implicit variables 9nightly builds dated 06/11/2005
or later), and the test
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-173?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-173:
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in JPOX CVS. Test passes with builds dated 05/11/2005 or later
JPOX does not support instanceof operator
JDOQL test NotEquals comparing floating point numbers
-
Key: JDO-206
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-206
Project: JDO
Type: Bug
Components: tck20
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
The current TCK
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-198?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-198:
Resolution: Fixed
This was fixed in JPOX builds 03/11/2005 onwards
TestArrayCollections java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: out of field index
:28
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-198?page=comments#action_12356749 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-198:
Yes, but did you re-enhance your classes since downloading ? The error is in
the enhancement, not at runtime.
TestArrayCollections
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-171?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-171:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
Fixed in JPOX CVS - builds dated 02/11/2005 or later
JPOX violates assertion
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-98?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-98:
-
Assign To: Michelle Caisse (was: Andy Jefferson)
With JPOX latest build this now fails with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-170?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-170:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
Fixed in JPOX CVS (assuming this is the TCK test InvalidUseOfKeywords)
JPOX does not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-187?page=comments#action_12332756 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-187:
Actually was an issue in InstanceCallbacks and not InstanceLifecycleListener.
JPOX CVS now uses the objects the other way around on the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-186?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-186:
--
Assign To: Craig Russell (was: Andy Jefferson)
Actually was an issue in InstanceCallbacks and not InstanceLifecycleListener.
JPOX CVS now uses the objects
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-98?page=comments#action_12332759
]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-98:
---
JPOX CVS has support for much more in the array world now (like arrays of
String, Date, etc, and persisting using a join table). Things
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-144?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-144:
--
Assign To: Michelle Caisse (was: Andy Jefferson)
Thanks Michelle.
Well I'll explain what the problem is, and some options.
The test creates an object with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-183?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-183:
Resolution: Fixed
Test now passes with JPOX CVS
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0 = 0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-182?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson resolved JDO-182:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Erik Bengtson)
TestSetCollections and TestHashSetCollections both now pass with JPOX CVS.
SQL
testRetrieve : has incorrect parameter specification to PM.retrieve() in terms
of the fgOnly parameter.
---
Key: JDO-192
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-192
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-175?page=comments#action_12331642 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-175:
This will likely work with latest JPOX CVS, but since this JIRA issue is based
on something that isn't even checked in, it is not
Release snapshots of Apache JDO deliverables
Key: JDO-179
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-179
Project: JDO
Type: Task
Components: api20
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
The development lifecycle of any
Publish API 1.1 and API 2.0 javadocs on website
---
Key: JDO-180
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-180
Project: JDO
Type: Task
Components: site and infrastructure
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
A
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-144?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-144:
--
Assign To: Andy Jefferson (was: Michelle Caisse)
The reason you get a org.jpox.sco.Collection when inspecting the type of the
collection field *whilst
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-144?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-144:
--
Assign To: Michelle Caisse (was: Andy Jefferson)
JPOX CVS now has the necessary changes so that the wrapper type used is based
on the instantiated type
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-144?page=comments#action_12331296 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-144:
The differences are down to
1. SQL DATE type being used in the schema when it should be using TIMESTAMP. If
you want to store a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-144?page=comments#action_12331312 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-144:
Issue 2 and 3 above are now fixed in JPOX CVS - JPOX builds dated 05/10/2005 or
later have this. The test now gives
Expected and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-150?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson updated JDO-150:
---
Attachment: patch.txt
The attached patch is hopefully adequate.
JPOX CVS includes the missing retrieve() method (nightly builds dated
27/09/2005 onwards) so patch
701 - 800 of 803 matches
Mail list logo
