[jira] Updated: (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-607: -- Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release 2) JDO 2 maintenance release 3 We

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12634962#action_12634962 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- Just one comment on the tck patch. The line

[jira] Commented: (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630899#action_12630899 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-607: --- I've reverted this change. I've looked in the Java

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630901#action_12630901 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- A slight flaw with my previous suggestion of throwing

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630788#action_12630788 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- Good catches on the javadoc. A minor spec update. I'd

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630839#action_12630839 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- svn commit -m JDO-590 Prepare JDO_Test for isolation

[jira] Updated: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-582: -- Attachment: (was: 20080710-jdo-582.diff) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception

[jira] Updated: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-582: -- Attachment: (was: 20080710-jdo-582.diff) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception

[jira] Updated: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-582: -- Attachment: (was: Negative09.zip) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception

[jira] Updated: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-582: -- Attachment: (was: 20080911-jdo-582.patch) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-582. --- Resolution: Fixed Thanks to a lot of work by Richard Schilling, this is now fixed and checked

[jira] Commented: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630336#action_12630336 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-582: --- Great. I'll review the code changes to JDOHelper

[jira] Commented: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630422#action_12630422 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-582: --- Could you repost the patch for the Negative09? It looks

[jira] Commented: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630452#action_12630452 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-582: --- I had initially set up the test with two configuration

[jira] Commented: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630467#action_12630467 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-582: --- The setup is what I expected. I had suggested using

[jira] Commented: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630468#action_12630468 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-582: --- To stimulate the Map, Map, Loader, Loader method you

[jira] Commented: (JDO-582) Test case needed for JDOFatalUserException nested exception argument needs cast to Throwable[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630475#action_12630475 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-582: --- Ok, so you should use one (not two) jdoconfig.xml

[jira] Updated: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-590: -- Attachment: jdo-590.patch I've changed Transaction.setTransactionIsolationLevel

[jira] Updated: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-590: -- Attachment: (was: jdo-590.patch) Control over transaction isolation level

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12629937#action_12629937 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- One more note as I was working on the test cases. I'd

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12629234#action_12629234 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- Maybe ought to be consistent, so change the PMF ones

[jira] Updated: (JDO-573) JPOX creates bad SQL for navigational queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-573: -- Affects Version/s: JDO 2 maintenance release 2 Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12629287#action_12629287 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- String[] Transaction.getSupportedIsolationLevels

[jira] Updated: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-590: -- Attachment: jdo-590.patch Please review this patch. The runonce.conf tck test passes... Control over

[jira] Commented: (JDO-580) Add TCK query test using an aggregate on a size expression

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12629310#action_12629310 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-580: --- Related issue: the specification is not explicit about

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12629333#action_12629333 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590

[jira] Updated: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-590: -- Attachment: (was: jdo-590.patch) Control over transaction isolation level

[jira] Updated: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-590: -- Attachment: jdo-590.patch Updated patch with tck2 tests for both PersistenceManagerFactory

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12629348#action_12629348 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- Coming back to the constants, should we have the full

[jira] Updated: (JDO-591) Enhancer Invocation API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-591: -- Component/s: (was: tck2-legacy) (was: api2-legacy

[jira] Created: (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

Project: JDO Issue Type: New Feature Components: api2 Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 1 Reporter: Craig Russell Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 2 In order to use Java 6 ServiceLoader to instantiate PMF, the class needs to implement

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-607: - Assignee: Craig Russell Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods

[jira] Updated: (JDO-556) JDOHelper should use Java 6 ServiceLoader if available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-556: -- Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release 2) JDO 2 maintenance release 3

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12628723#action_12628723 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- If we agree that the mechanism for specifying

[jira] Updated: (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-607: -- Attachment: jdo-607.patch Please review this patch. It adds the methods getPersistenceManagerFactory(Map

[jira] Updated: (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-607: -- Attachment: jdo-607.patch Updated to include signature file. The RI passes the TCK with these changes

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-590: - Assignee: Craig Russell Control over transaction isolation level

[jira] Updated: (JDO-601) API2.MF is erroneously included in the jar file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-601: -- Component/s: api2-legacy api2 Add components affected. API2.MF is erroneously included

[jira] Commented: (JDO-558) Create tests for the serialization of PersistenceManagerFactory/PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12625462#action_12625462 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-558: --- For reference, I've updated the assertions

[jira] Updated: (JDO-558) Create tests for the serialization of PersistenceManagerFactory/PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-558: -- Attachment: jdo-558.patch This test serializes and materializes a PMF and makes sure the restored PMF

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-595) Provide more configuration output from test run

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-595: - Assignee: Michelle Caisse Provide more configuration output from test run

[jira] Commented: (JDO-558) Create tests for the serialization of PersistenceManagerFactory/PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624110#action_12624110 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-558: --- Tests will serialize a PMF and then materialize

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-554. --- Resolution: Fixed JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups - Key

[jira] Commented: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12622902#action_12622902 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-597: --- Good catch. svn commit -m JDO-597 fix tests to fail

[jira] Commented: (JDO-556) JDOHelper should use Java 6 ServiceLoader if available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12622911#action_12622911 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-556: --- The prerequisite for this feature is a no-args

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-556) JDOHelper should use Java 6 ServiceLoader if available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-556: - Assignee: Craig Russell (was: Matthew T. Adams) JDOHelper should use Java 6 ServiceLoader

[jira] Created: (JDO-605) Investigate use of JDO without any reflection. Now, some queries require reflection for creating new result class instances.

URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-605 Project: JDO Issue Type: New Feature Components: api2 Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 1 Reporter: Craig Russell Assignee: Richard Schilling Priority: Minor

[jira] Commented: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12622959#action_12622959 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-597: --- svn commit -m JDO-597 Add more diagnostics to ReadOnly

[jira] Reopened: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reopened JDO-597: --- After making the changes suggested by Andy (thanks!), the test now works with datastore identity but fails

[jira] Commented: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12622985#action_12622985 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-597: --- Added constants to signatures file. svn commit -m JDO

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-597. --- Resolution: Fixed All tck tests now pass. PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only

[jira] Commented: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623051#action_12623051 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-597: --- Loading the oid class did the trick. svn commit -m JDO

[jira] Commented: (JDO-583) Add license headers to source files.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623054#action_12623054 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-583: --- Looks good. Were you planning on adding the // style

[jira] Commented: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623058#action_12623058 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-554: --- I think Date should be a basic type, since the intent

[jira] Commented: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623073#action_12623073 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-554: --- also in the test you helpfully added the relevant bit

[jira] Commented: (JDO-603) dist goal fails if top level dir does not end in jdo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623075#action_12623075 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-603: --- Good idea. The dist goal should not continue

[jira] Commented: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12622572#action_12622572 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-554: --- Hehe, this is the problem with test first. Thanks

[jira] Created: (JDO-604) Update schema tests for 2.2

Reporter: Craig Russell Assignee: Craig Russell Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 2 The schema tests need to be updated for JDO 2.2. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-587) The xml schema for jdoconfig.xml is indented badly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-587. --- Resolution: Fixed svn commit -m JDO-587 Change indent of jdoconfig.xml for readability src/schema

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-604) Update schema tests for 2.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-604. --- Resolution: Fixed svn commit -m JDO-604 Update schema tests to refer to 2.2 test Sendingtest

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-554: - Assignee: Andy Jefferson The patch for the API and TCK sources is complete and checked

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell resolved JDO-597. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Andy Jefferson Test cases for the get/setReadOnly and behavior

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch Changes include: Added methods set/getFetchDepth to FetchGroup. Updated

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch Right you are. Patch contains the fix. JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch I've added a test case that compiles but who knows if it actually tests

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch Update test with negative tests. Any comments on the test case? Should we

[jira] Commented: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621496#action_12621496 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-554: --- Re: FetchGroup addCategory/removeCategory. What I had

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch Updated per Andy's comments. Still looking for comments on the add/remove

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: FetchGroup Lifecycle.JPG I thought I'd try to describe the life cycle of a FetchGroup under

[jira] Commented: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621296#action_12621296 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-554: --- I can see the need to dynamically alter the behavior

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch First draft of complete API. What's missing/wrong? JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch A few updates. Javadoc is now self-consistent. SecurityException is thrown

[jira] Updated: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-554: -- Attachment: jdo-554.patch This is a proposed FetchGroup interface. JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[jira] Commented: (JDO-590) Control over transaction isolation level

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12620322#action_12620322 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-590: --- The structure of this proposal makes sense: add get/set

[jira] Commented: (JDO-463) Clarify the behavior of an ordering column mapped to a user-visible field in the target class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12620342#action_12620342 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-463: --- I'm inclined to go with the first interpretation

[jira] Commented: (JDO-554) JDO2.2 : Dynamic fetch groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12620369#action_12620369 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-554: --- I think we need to be careful about managing the scope

[jira] Updated: (JDO-587) The xml schema for jdoconfig.xml is indented badly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-587: -- Attachment: jdo-587.patch This is a whitespace and grammar patch so it's tough to review. The TCK passes

[jira] Closed: (JDO-599) Level 2 Caching ability to restrict what classes/fields are cahed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell closed JDO-599. - Resolution: Fixed The draft specification dated 30-July-2008 has been updated. Level 2 Caching ability

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-599) Level 2 Caching ability to restrict what classes/fields are cahed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-599: - Assignee: Craig Russell Level 2 Caching ability to restrict what classes/fields are cahed

[jira] Closed: (JDO-598) Make SingleFieldIdentity classes implement Comparable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell closed JDO-598. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Andy Jefferson SingleFieldIdentity classes now implement Comparable

[jira] Updated: (JDO-596) Upgrade to maven 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-596: -- Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 maintenance release 2) This is a task of unknown benefit and unknown time

[jira] Updated: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-555: -- Attachment: ClassMetaData.java-patch This patch adds doPrivileged around some metadata access calls

[jira] Commented: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614057#action_12614057 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-555: --- I've now checked in src/conf/security.conf and made

[jira] Updated: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-555: -- Priority: Minor (was: Major) Downgrading this bug because the JDOHelper seems to now have proper

[jira] Commented: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614108#action_12614108 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-555: --- [java] 1) testNewInstanceInterface

[jira] Commented: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614127#action_12614127 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-555: --- There's another area that isn't protected

[jira] Updated: (JDO-599) Level 2 Caching ability to restrict what classes/fields are cahed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-599: -- Attachment: jdo-599.patch All boolean values are actually represented as Strings in annotations. Having

[jira] Updated: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-555: -- Attachment: datanucleus.patch The changes in svn didn't include these changes to MetaDataManager. All

[jira] Updated: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-555: -- Attachment: xmlbean.patch This patch adds doPrivileged to calls to spring bean processing. The method

[jira] Commented: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613531#action_12613531 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-555: --- Andy, Yes, initialise() is the culprit I see. Without

[jira] Commented: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613096#action_12613096 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-555: --- The nightly works for the access controls

[jira] Updated: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-555: -- Attachment: datanucleus.patch This patch is for datanucleus core. It adds required doPrivileged blocks

[jira] Updated: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell updated JDO-555: -- Attachment: jdo-555.patch Please review this patch. It allows you to specify -Djdo.tck.security when

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

Assignee: Craig Russell Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 2 Attachments: jdo-555.patch, jdo-555.patch, jdo-555.patch Discovered in review of patch to JDO-545. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment

[jira] Commented: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613023#action_12613023 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-555: --- svn commit -m JDO-555 Add security manager option

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-555) All calls to Class.getMethod and Method.invoke (among others) need to be invoked inside a doPrivileged block.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig Russell reassigned JDO-555: - Assignee: Andy Jefferson (was: Craig Russell) There's still a bit of work to do to make sure

[jira] Commented: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12608811#action_12608811 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-597: --- Need TCK tests for this as well. Since we don't

[jira] Commented: (JDO-598) Make SingleFieldIdentity classes implement Comparable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12608529#action_12608529 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-598: --- Thanks for providing this patch. 1. Yes, this should

[jira] Commented: (JDO-597) PMF : Add readOnly setting for better handling of read-only datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12608573#action_12608573 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-597: --- Good so far. A patch for PMF.java is next? We can

[jira] Commented: (JDO-598) Make SingleFieldIdentity classes implement Comparable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12608631#action_12608631 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-598: --- I think that an implementation of compareTo that always

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >