Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Michael Neale
In various blogs, books and conferences like citcon I have heard the term "continuous delivery" used to mean the overarching concepts that you mention needs a new name at the end. Like all terms, it can grow in meaning, and runs a risk of being meaningless, but it does s

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Tom Moore
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: I think it's probably poor wording on my part. I didn't mean to imply that > CI is no longer a thing. I think of CD as a super set of CI, in the sense > that everything you do under the banner CI also contributes to CD. > > I think you're

Re: Adopting a few plugins

2015-09-25 Thread Arcadiy Ivanov
Thanks David. How do I get release upload privileges? I need to patch GHPRB as an emergency measure and release the patch - the plugin is unusable right now on private repositories due to a recent merge. On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 9:33:19 AM UTC-4, David Tanner wrote: > > I have added h

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
2015-09-25 10:55 GMT-07:00 Jesse Glick : > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi > wrote: > > Let's use the opportunity to update some of the libraries. I'm thinking > > about things like Groovy, which according to the testing done during > > Copenhagen Hackathon, should be compatib

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
2015-09-25 5:03 GMT-07:00 Stephen Connolly : > w00t so if I read that correctly then we're dropping the evil job type > for Jenkins 2.0 ;-) > Just so that the rest of the world knows you are joking. No we aren't. We need to keep it running. *unless the Maven project does a Maven 3.4.x after JDK

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
2015-09-24 23:58 GMT-07:00 domi : > As Richard, I also think that we would need some sort of a concept for a > CD pipeline. I consider my self as a quite advanced jenkins user, but still > I end up redesigning some sort of a CD pipeline with every new installation > or even project from scratch wi

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Michael Neale
On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 8:37:50 PM UTC+10, Kanstantsin Shautsou wrote: > > > About CI->CD. > As technical person i see no benefits as it's all just a part of > "automation". No matter what automate: builds, deploys, flows, etc. > Automation - is what saves your time and money in any fi

Request hosting for Tinfoil Security plugin

2015-09-25 Thread Angel Irizarry
Hi. I would like to have our plugin hosted on jenkins-ci.org. Here's the information about it: - GitHub URL: https://github.com/tinfoil/jenkins-plugin - Preferred name: tinfoil-scan - Personal GitHub name: angelman - jenkins-ci.org username: angelman - Description: This plugin al

Re: [Plugin Hosting Request]

2015-09-25 Thread Tatiana Didik
Thank you, Jesse! Got rid of binary files in repository. Anything else? пятница, 25 сентября 2015 г., 15:38:30 UTC-4 пользователь Jesse Glick написал: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Татьяна Горецкая > wrote: > > I've removed binaries and unused classes and branches from repo > > Not su

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
Yes yes yes. Let's kill groovy views! I nearly have handlebar views working On Friday 25 September 2015, Jesse Glick wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi > wrote: > > Let's use the opportunity to update some of the libraries. I'm thinking > > about things like Groovy, wh

Re: [Plugin Hosting Request]

2015-09-25 Thread Jesse Glick
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Татьяна Горецкая wrote: > I've removed binaries and unused classes and branches from repo Not sure if the files deleted in https://github.com/aquarellian/genar/commit/c81fdbadc4496f52b99e0e571ac01d5eaa59c81f are big enough to matter, but if so, try: https://rtyl

Re: [Plugin Hosting Request]

2015-09-25 Thread Татьяна Горецкая
Hello, I've removed binaries and unused classes and branches from repo (thank you for your hint!). четверг, 24 сентября 2015 г., 14:25:20 UTC-4 пользователь Kanstantsin Shautsou написал: > > Hi, it probably makes sense to remove hpi binaries and filter-branch > repository. It is usually a good

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Jesse Glick
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: > Let's use the opportunity to update some of the libraries. I'm thinking > about things like Groovy, which according to the testing done during > Copenhagen Hackathon, should be compatible. IMO rather than compound our error, do the righ

Re: Automatically import sample job while launching hpi:run

2015-09-25 Thread Jesse Glick
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Paul Wellner Bou wrote: > for testing purposes I would like to create an example Job on launching mvn > hpi:run. Is this possible Not that I know of. If this is for your personal test purposes, just create it interactively. No need to share. The `work/` subdirec

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel Beck
On 25.09.2015, at 14:49, Tom Moore wrote: > This is a great thread. I do want to raise one point though. This should > be a "clean" repacking and try to avoid inclusion of plugin functionality in > the install that may not be needed or desired. Your mentioning of Git for > example. Jen

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Kanstantsin Shautsou
> > I'd prefer identifying the plugin "groups" we know people will nearly always > use, such as a SCM, Authentication, or a Builder (Maven, MSBuild, Unity, etc) > and the first time a Jenkins server is started and the UI logged into then > the user is sent into a wizard to select the ones to do

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Tom Moore
This is a great thread. I do want to raise one point though. This should be a "clean" repacking and try to avoid inclusion of plugin functionality in the install that may not be needed or desired. Your mentioning of Git for example. Jenkins is used by people who utilize CVS, SVN, Git, Ba

Re: hosting request for new plugin

2015-09-25 Thread Alexander Leibzon
Thanks! On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 2:09:54 PM UTC+3, Daniel Beck wrote: > > Right, I specifically meant the name of the forked repo in the jenkinsci > org: > > https://github.com/jenkinsci/pagerduty-plugin > > There's also a component 'pagerduty-plugin' owned by you in > issues.jenkins-c

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Tom Fennelly
On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 7:21:34 AM UTC+1, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: > > As you say, for compatibility reasons I don't think we can remove them. > > But that "brand-new way of doing frontend development" that I mentioned > touches a related space. It borrows a lot of tooling from NodeJS, su

Hosting request for new plugin creating a Jira URL out of the Git history/changelog

2015-09-25 Thread Paul Wellner Bou
Github: https://github.com/paulwellnerbou/git-jira-log-jenkins-plugin jenkins repo name: git-jira-log(-plugin) Github Username: paulwellnerbou jenkins username: paulwellnerbou What the plugin does and how it is used is documented in it's README.md Thank you, kind regards and a nice weekend, Pau

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Stephen Connolly
w00t so if I read that correctly then we're dropping the evil job type for Jenkins 2.0 ;-) *unless the Maven project does a Maven 3.4.x after JDK9 is released and before Jenkins 2.0 as then Maven 3.4.x will only be supported on Java 9 and Java 9-1 On 25 September 2015 at 12:22, Daniel Beck wrote

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel Beck
On 25.09.2015, at 09:04, nicolas de loof wrote: > The fact some didn't yet upgraded to 1.8 has been discussed already, we are > talking here about Jenkins runtime, not the projects it builds and deploy, > that can target Java 1.1 ... 1 in 8 Jenkins jobs are based on the Maven job type, whose

Re: hosting request for new plugin

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel Beck
Right, I specifically meant the name of the forked repo in the jenkinsci org: https://github.com/jenkinsci/pagerduty-plugin There's also a component 'pagerduty-plugin' owned by you in issues.jenkins-ci.org. Welcome aboard! On 24.09.2015, at 23:13, Alexander Leibzon wrote: > Thanks for pointi

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread Kanstantsin Shautsou
Will be glad to see: - normal Queue handling with normal Cloud/provisioning API. We are leaving in clouds 3-4 years but jenkins still can't satisfy this requirement. - reworked freestyle job, at least merge builders and publishers in repeatable way. About CI->CD. As technical person i see no be

Automatically import sample job while launching hpi:run

2015-09-25 Thread Paul Wellner Bou
Hello, I am developing a plugin, and for testing purposes I would like to create an example Job on launching mvn hpi:run. Is this possible, and what would be the best way to do this? Thank you and best regards Paul Wellner Bou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

Re: Jenkins UX

2015-09-25 Thread Michael Neale
On the topic of configuring workflow, curious to hear feedback on some ideas. I often hear that a "blank text area" is a bit intimidating, and of course docs and the snippet builder helps, but there can be more. Would people like to hear more about: 1) Richer content aware text/code editing (a

Re: Plugin Hosting Request: job-dsl-promotions-plugin

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel Spilker
Picking up the discussion from https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-21750. I want to avoid that the job-dsl-promotions-plugin gets released outside of the Update Center. That's only a short-term solution. The Promoted Builds Plugin does not seem to have a maintainer, but please correct me

Re: Request hosting for Performance Signature Plugin

2015-09-25 Thread Raphael Pionke
Any update to this? Kind regards, Raphael Am Dienstag, 22. September 2015 11:09:59 UTC+2 schrieb Raphael Pionke: > > Hi Oleg, > > we know the other Dynatrace plugin and after a long evaluation, we have > decided > to developed a new plugin with (good) serious reasons > > >- completely diffe

Re: hosting request for new plugin

2015-09-25 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Well, as your plugin, when forked, is gonna be under the Jenkins org, it will both clear that it's Jenkins related and inconsistently named compared to others. -- Baptiste Le 24 sept. 2015 11:13 PM, "Alexander Leibzon" a écrit : > Thanks for pointing me on that! > > artifactid in pom.xml changed

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

2015-09-25 Thread nicolas de loof
[Time to bump up the system requirement to Java 8 and Servlet 3.0. Let's think about what this would enable to users. Again, we talked about this a bit in FOSDEM.] Spring changed major version number as they changed the minimal JDK requirement, even the API didn't changed. I think it make sense to

RE: Request for new Plugin hosting

2015-09-25 Thread Baptiste Mathus
You can follow the Jenkins_release twitter account. When the tweet about your plugin is published, it's a good indicator the release has actually completed successfully :) Le 24 sept. 2015 11:35 AM, "Olivier Picciotto" a écrit : > Thanks, > > > > Yes the Wikipage is here ; > > > https://wiki.jenk