Re: Deleted merged branches from jenkinsci/jenkins

On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 2:33:55 AM UTC+3, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > > On 22.09.2016, at 23:55, Kanstantsin Shautsou > wrote: > > > > Finally! Now the question is about staled branches and single-person > branches. > > Yes. I made a list and plan to contact

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

Yeah breaking the fork link would be under the control of the other repo fwiw so I couldn't promise that. But I'll give it as try. At the least, I'll play some catch up to understand where mr tanner left off, and then get things rolling again. sent via Android On Sep 26, 2016 4:57 PM, "Baptiste

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

@Ben, if you can indeed also work on improving that state, that would be great. Maybe breaking the fork link to make the jenkinsci repo not appear as a fork anymore, move issues to JIRA and so on... That would be probably beneficial to users to not have 2 or 3 places to look at to look for and

Re: Speeding up JenkinsRule tests?

Yes that is the exact use case that drove me to write JenkinsRule in the first place... the ability to use @ClassRule for the tests that do not need the instance wiped clean in-between On 26 September 2016 at 21:40, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Yipes! Even better for the full

Re: Speeding up JenkinsRule tests?

Yipes! Even better for the full test run - from 51m47s end-to-end on ci.jenkins.io to 6m8s with @ClassRule. Looks like that actually is the magic bullet here. A. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > huh, initial experiments with turning the JenkinsRule

Re: Speeding up JenkinsRule tests?

huh, initial experiments with turning the JenkinsRule into a @ClassRule rather than a @Rule have been...surprisingly positive. 4+x decrease in one of the parameterized tests (from 95s to 21s). I'll experiment more in that direction. A. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Bayer

Speeding up JenkinsRule tests?

My tests in https://github.com/jenkinsci/pipeline-model-definition-plugin take...an ungodly amount of time. In part, that's 'cos I'm doing a *lot* of tests, and I'm using parameterized tests to make sure that failures are clear in some cases. But I gotta feel like things could be sped up. Does

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

James - Since the plugin is maintained on jenkinsci and not janinko, is it fair enough to call the problem you're referencing https://github.com/jenkinsci/ghprb-plugin/issues/414 On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:06 AM, James Dumay wrote: > I know this plugin is extensively in use

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

If you need clarification on anything I can respond to emails, I just don't have time for PR reviews/new features. On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:33:36 PM UTC-6, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > Just made you the new maintainer of that plugin. > > Many things: > > * you must accept

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

Hi Ben, Just made you the new maintainer of that plugin. Many things: * you must accept the GitHub invitation to make that effective * you will have to file a PR to https://github.com/jenkins-infra/repository-permissions-updater/ to be able to release * Please beware about the backward compat.

Re: Adding pipeline compatabilty to jenkins plugin

could you please post the stack trace from the console? On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 6:38:55 PM UTC+3, Cédric Cousseran wrote: > > Thanks for the response, > > I took a look at your code, but I've not been able to notice any > noticeable difference. > > Here is my code, if you have any idea

Re: Compatability with parallel

Thanks! Yes, I still can't trace the source, I need to inspect threads more carefully to try to catch it. Are there any methods that i need to look into - given the below exceptions? PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsStepContext onFailure WARNING: already completed

Re: Possible Workflow Multibranch Plugin change

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Justin Harringa wrote: > make a couple of things in this plugin more extensible to > write a plugin. Would probably suffice to extract the main logic of `SCMBinder` into an `abstract` supertype, though it is pretty short as it stands

Re: Compatability with parallel

Thanks for the answer! Currently, I can't seem to pinpoint the exact issue when it crashes and I'm still thinking of the appropriate way to debug it. Maybe it's due to the fact that I'm using Abstract Sync non block step? instead of the ASync one? although I don't see that as an issue. PM

Re: Adding pipeline compatabilty to jenkins plugin

Thanks for the response, I took a look at your code, but I've not been able to notice any noticeable difference. Here is my code, if you have any idea what's wrong in it: public class CustomStepExecution extends AbstractSynchronousNonBlockingStepExecution { private static final long

Re: INTEGRATING JENKINS AND GIT REMOTELY

You could try to open that URL in your web browser (since you've chosen to use http as the access method). If that fails, then you can use your web browser to diagnose why it is failing (incorrect URL, incorrect credentials, incorrect permissions on a file or directory in the file system, gitlist

Re: Requesting feedback on upcoming pipeline compatible SonarQube plugin

Hi Jesse, Thanks for the feedback. Yes, that step takes more than a few seconds, so we'll definitely look into your suggestion. Is there a documentation on implementation using durable steps? I've read the DEVGUIDE a couple of times, but I don't recall mention of this. If there's a

INTEGRATING JENKINS AND GIT REMOTELY

Hello frinds, I am trying to integrate Jenkins with my git repository. Well both are running on two different machine acquiring two different ip address. So, scenario is like this, 1. Lets say *JENKINS* running on *user1@192.168.5.50* and *GIT* is running on *user2@192.168.5.51* 2. One maven

Re: Adding pipeline compatabilty to jenkins plugin

If you'd publish some link to your code - I could take a look and see if there's any fix i made that can be relevant for your plugin. You can also compare here to see if you spot any differences (it's in ongoing work following the comments I got from Jesse but it works)

Re: Stepping in as Kerberos SSO co-maintainer

On 2016-09-26 15:48, Robert Sandell wrote: I don't know what the steps are needed to take besides the IRC Bot after Daniel's security changes, otherwise I could add you as a contributor myself, so I'm leaving it to someone with more knowledge that usually does these things ;) I did that

Re: Stepping in as Kerberos SSO co-maintainer

I don't know what the steps are needed to take besides the IRC Bot after Daniel's security changes, otherwise I could add you as a contributor myself, so I'm leaving it to someone with more knowledge that usually does these things ;) /B On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Tomas Westling

Re: Adding pipeline compatabilty to jenkins plugin

Hi, I've encountered the same issue with my plugin, the syntax of the snippet generator is not supported. I've tried the solutions you mentioned, without success. Do you have a more precise idea of what caused your issue? Thanks, Cédric Cousseran Le jeudi 1 septembre 2016 14:53:45 UTC+2, Fima

Re: How to add nested view with groovy script ?

Thanks Victor and Daniel removing extra underscore made it to work On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 10:33:53 AM UTC-4, user-dev wrote: > > I am trying to add a nested view using groovy script but is failing > Jenkins.instance.instance.addView(new > hudson.plugins.nested__view.NestedView("Sample

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

Hi Baptiste - By Jenkins ID you mean JIRA ID, right? That's bpatterson. Let me know if you need anything else Ben On Sep 26, 2016 2:33 AM, "Baptiste Mathus" wrote: > Hey, > Great you're interested. > Can you give us your Jenkins id too? > > Thanks > > Le 24 sept. 2016

Re: Stepping in as Kerberos SSO co-maintainer

Ok by me as well! /Tomas Den måndag 26 september 2016 kl. 12:48:23 UTC+2 skrev Robert Sandell: > > OK by me! > > /B > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Oliver Gondža > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There is little activity in the plugin and I would like to step in as a >>

Re: Stepping in as Kerberos SSO co-maintainer

OK by me! /B On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Oliver Gondža wrote: > Hi, > > There is little activity in the plugin and I would like to step in as a > maintainer. I already started fixing and extending the test coverage: > >

Stepping in as Kerberos SSO co-maintainer

Hi, There is little activity in the plugin and I would like to step in as a maintainer. I already started fixing and extending the test coverage: https://github.com/jenkinsci/kerberos-sso-plugin/pull/4 https://github.com/jenkinsci/acceptance-test-harness/pull/192 Cheers -- oliver -- You

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

Hey, Great you're interested. Can you give us your Jenkins id too? Thanks Le 24 sept. 2016 9:59 PM, "Ben Patterson" a écrit : > Och I should have mentioned my github id: benpatterson > > sent via Android > > On Sep 24, 2016 12:56 PM, "Ben Patterson"

Re: Someone to take over GHPRB

I know this plugin is extensively in use for ci.swift.org (Yeah, Apple's Swift Language team use Jenkins!) and they are running into some issues ( https://github.com/janinko/ghprb/issues/150 and https://github.com/janinko/ghprb/issues/284 specifically) so it would be great to see someone pick