Re: Commit access to vstestrunner-plugin

2017-10-20 Thread Erik Goughnour
Thanks Daniel! I will try to get the next release into Artifactory as quickly as possible. BTW I already refactored using @DataBoundSetter. On Friday, October 20, 2017, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > On 5. Oct 2017, at 18:40, Erik Goughnour >

Re: freestyle-multibranch, multibranch, scm-api questions

2017-10-20 Thread Jesse Glick
Have not been following closely, but offhand: On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Form validation. > > All the descriptors assume they are in a FreeStyleProject... or if you are > luck an AbstractProject... or perhaps if you are really

Re: freestyle-multibranch, multibranch, scm-api questions

2017-10-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 20 October 2017 at 21:14, Kanstantsin Shautsou wrote: > > > On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 2:16:41 PM UTC+3, Stephen Connolly wrote: >> >> >> >> On 20 October 2017 at 04:02, Kanstantsin Shautsou >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> 2017-10-20 11:50

Re: freestyle-multibranch, multibranch, scm-api questions

2017-10-20 Thread Kanstantsin Shautsou
On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 2:16:41 PM UTC+3, Stephen Connolly wrote: > > > > On 20 October 2017 at 04:02, Kanstantsin Shautsou > wrote: > >> >> >> 2017-10-20 11:50 GMT+03:00 Stephen Connolly > >: >> >>> On 19 October 2017 at 17:42,

Re: Request for feedback: Jenkins Enhancement Proposal (JEP)

2017-10-20 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
I admit I kept my eyes off this ball for a while. Naturally, I'm surprised at this change. My understanding was that this change is being considered as a reaction to those two concerns: > 1. Kohsuke as the BDFL introduces a problematic bottleneck to the process >(there are way more of us,

Re: Commit access to vstestrunner-plugin

2017-10-20 Thread Daniel Beck
> On 5. Oct 2017, at 18:40, Erik Goughnour wrote: > > I did read the link. I had actually read it (along with quite a bit of the > rest of the documentation) before I created the PR that I was trying to > merge. There is evidence of this. Notice I tagged the PR per

Re: freestyle-multibranch, multibranch, scm-api questions

2017-10-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 20 October 2017 at 04:02, Kanstantsin Shautsou wrote: > > > 2017-10-20 11:50 GMT+03:00 Stephen Connolly com>: > >> On 19 October 2017 at 17:42, Kanstantsin Shautsou < >> kanstantsin@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Trying to make

Re: freestyle-multibranch, multibranch, scm-api questions

2017-10-20 Thread Kanstantsin Shautsou
2017-10-20 11:50 GMT+03:00 Stephen Connolly : > On 19 October 2017 at 17:42, Kanstantsin Shautsou < > kanstantsin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Trying to make multibranch support with not messed buildhistory by >> reusing my flexible github triggering code and

Re: freestyle-multibranch, multibranch, scm-api questions

2017-10-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 19 October 2017 at 17:42, Kanstantsin Shautsou wrote: > Trying to make multibranch support with not messed buildhistory by reusing > my flexible github triggering code and experience. > Unclear what you mean by "not messed build history"... with multibranch, each