Re: Bill of Materials

Hi Tyler, Thanks for the feedback! > I believe the only think which needs to be resolved which is likely just an > obsolete part of the example YAML. The root `status` key in the YAML for a > "realized" BOM I don't believe we've ever actually used and is worth > removing. Actually I use it

Re: Bill of Materials

(replies inline) On Mon, 06 Aug 2018, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > Status update: By now Custom War Packager has been released in 1.0, and > there are also many updates in Evergreen. IMHO it is a good time to get > this story over the fence. Thanks for working to drive this to

Re: Bill of Materials

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:23 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > there is a number of stories related to it, e.g. are pending patches for > essentialsTest() Interesting, I will take a look at these. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers"

Re: Bill of Materials

Hi Jesse, Yes, essentialsTest() didn't get as much progress as I would have expected. Not my decision, the story has been handed over to other contributors. But there is a number of stories related to it, e.g. are pending patches for essentialsTest(): - Core:

Re: How to use incrementalify goal in the jenkinsci/jenkins project

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:55 AM Victor Martinez wrote: > I tried with the below 2 maven commands to reproduce the release process of > the jenkinsci/jenkins project : > > mvn release:prepare release:perform > mvn incrementals:incrementalify I think you meant `reincrementalify`, not

Re: Bill of Materials

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:25 AM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > We define cross-dependencies between CWP formats and Jenkins Infrastructure > (essentialsTest() on ci.jenkins.io) Yes, this is a cross-dependency, since the `pipeline-library` method calls do not seem to specify a version of CWP. Where is

How to use incrementalify goal in the jenkinsci/jenkins project

Hi folks, I'd like to know how the release process for the jenkinsci/jenkins core works with the incrementablify. I tried with the below 2 maven commands to reproduce the release process of the jenkinsci/jenkins project : - mvn release:prepare release:perform - mvn

Re: Bill of Materials

Anyway, let's get some feedback from Jenkins Essentials folks before we proceed. On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I would prefer to get JEP-309 accepted, maybe as "Bill of Materials 1.0" > specification. We define cross-dependencies between CWP formats and Jenkins >

Re: Bill of Materials

I would prefer to get JEP-309 accepted, maybe as "Bill of Materials 1.0" specification. We define cross-dependencies between CWP formats and Jenkins Infrastructure (essentialsTest() on ci.jenkins.io), so I would prefer to have this format accepted even if it is the only reference implementation.

Re: Bill of Materials

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:11 AM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > The only outstanding comment is "YAGNI" from Jesse, but I believe that the > reference implementations justify it a bit. So I see that https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/blob/master/jep/309/README.adoc#prototype-implementation lists

Re: Multi branch and git hub organization project - pipeline Jenkins job

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:45 AM Chandru wrote: > Can someone help me how to get scm details from RUN object. > Since multi-branch and GitHub organization jobs holders the scm details in > initial configure page not sure how to extrxat the scm details. If you are specifically interested in

Re: [Essentials] First Install User Experience

For the record, https://github.com/jenkins-infra/evergreen/pull/168 is implementing this: no more upgrade wizard, and an admin is automatically created with an random password. Reviews/feedback welcome. Le mar. 31 juil. 2018 à 17:26, R. Tyler Croy a écrit : > (replies inline) > > On Fri, 27

Re: Updating Textbox when Drop-down value selected

Hello, You have started a new thread. Please link to the original one at least. BR, Oleg On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 10:07:35 PM UTC+2, Jigar Mehta wrote: > > Hi, > > Did you ever get this working? > I have the exact same scenario. > > Thanks > > > > -- > Sent from:

Re: [JENKINS-52868] - Fixing Windows installer OOTB experience on 64-bit platforms

Hi all, Lets discuss it next week at the Platform SIG meeting. I have created a Doodle so that we vote for a suitable time: https://doodle.com/poll/hsrv7q4rqxpfisba Best regards, Oleg On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Slide wrote: > It should work fine as you can have powershell scripts that

Re: Bill of Materials

Hi all, Status update: By now Custom War Packager has been released in 1.0, and there are also many updates in Evergreen. IMHO it is a good time to get this story over the fence. Last week I have submitted a patch to the design , which does the

Re: Adopting jUnit Attachments Plugin

Awesome. Thanks Oleg! On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 at 10:30, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hello Pete, > > Thanks you for the interest! If you ping once in GitHub, the message may > easily go missing. > Many people receive more notifications from GitHub than they can actually > handle. > Do not hesitate to ping