Re: BEING A Jenkins Developer

2018-11-30 Thread Lloyd Chang
Hello Kamaha Claude, I hope Mark Waite and Martin d'Anjou's replies help you in getting started. Curiously, did you learn about Jenkins via your school, University of Buea in Cameroon? Recently, I contacted schools worldwide about Jenkins Google Summer of Code, including your university in

Re: Alternative directory implementation of ArtifactManager?

2018-11-30 Thread Jesse Glick
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:59 AM Staffan Forsell wrote: > artifact-manager-s3 seems to contain examples of most of the things needed. Too complicated for your purpose. Creating a plugin with a lightly edited clone of `StandardArtifactManager` would suffice. (Use the Maven archetype for a plugin

Re: Alternative directory implementation of ArtifactManager?

2018-11-30 Thread Staffan Forsell
Well, we have lots of jobs, both freestyle and different styles of the new pipeline, not all for sw that's currently in active development but we still need to know we can build these. We would rather invest our time in something that's useful for all jobs without changing all those old job

Re: Disposable Jenkins & GitOps do not make a good match

2018-11-30 Thread Jesse Glick
The simplest approach, starting from what you are doing now, would be to keep the build records and other state files from your Jenkins installation, recreating only the configuration files from Git. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins

Re: Alternative directory implementation of ArtifactManager?

2018-11-30 Thread Jesse Glick
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:59 AM Staffan Forsell wrote: > Another way of doing this would be to just invest in lots of SSD storage for > our jenkins servers. Or just changing your projects to deploy artifacts to a proper repository manager. The `archiveArtifacts` step and its kin is intended

Re: Discussion: Community Onboarding/Outreach and Advocacy SIGs

2018-11-30 Thread Matt Sicker
I'd also be interested in this SIG. On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:26 PM arch wrote: > Collect the feedbacks from the contributors and users is important. Share > the questions and experience could let Jenkins community become stronger. > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:19 AM wrote: > >> I would very

Re: embeddable-build-status-plugin orphaned?

2018-11-30 Thread Jesse Glick
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 3:33 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I will ask the maintainers I do not know if there _are_ any maintainers. Not me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: Disposable Jenkins & GitOps do not make a good match

2018-11-30 Thread James Strachan
we solved this in Jenkins X through the use of Prow for handling webhooks & orchestrating the serverless jenkins pod and then using kubernetes custom resources to maintain state (pipeline activities, environments, teams, releases etc) https://jenkins-x.io/news/serverless-jenkins/ we then use an

Re: Alternative directory implementation of ArtifactManager?

2018-11-30 Thread Staffan Forsell
artifact-manager-s3 seems to contain examples of most of the things needed. I did not quite understand...do you recommend against trying to do this or something else? If we would implement the same tests and use the same key as artifact-manager-s3, I would thing it would not be unreasonable

Disposable Jenkins & GitOps do not make a good match

2018-11-30 Thread domi
Hi, Since we now have JCasC and the job-dsl plugin it is easier then ever to treat jenkins as a disposable resource and just recreate it from scratch whenever you feel the need for it. We do have build everything around this idea and reinstall our whole build infrastructure every time we need

Re: Alternative directory implementation of ArtifactManager?

2018-11-30 Thread Markus Winter
Implementation is quite easy I would say. You need an ArtifactManager (look at the StandardArtifactManager, you can probably just copy and replace the getArtifactsDir() method) And an ArtifactManagerFactory where you can configure the root path for the artifacts On 30.11.2018 10:40, Staffan

Re: [cppcheck-plugin] Unable to compile (missing sources)

2018-11-30 Thread Thomas Döring
I'm actually using VS Code + Maven plugin on Windows (and I'm a newbie on that front) to build the plugin. If I do a "clean" before every "compile" it works... a bit inconvenient, but it works. Thanks for your help. Am Freitag, 30. November 2018 10:32:25 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Beck: > >

Alternative directory implementation of ArtifactManager?

2018-11-30 Thread Staffan Forsell
Hello, I have been looking for a way moving the artifacts out of the builds directory and have been looking at the ArtifactManager. Is there a reason that I can't find an implementation of this that just uses a different local directory on the master? Would should an plugin be hard to implement

Re: [cppcheck-plugin] Unable to compile (missing sources)

2018-11-30 Thread Daniel Beck
Configure your IDE to include the generated sources directory in the sources (or just build with Maven). https://github.com/jenkinsci/cppcheck-plugin/blob/c81b79534602f258216096170c091ad31f8b7e60/pom.xml#L154 > On 30. Nov 2018, at 10:10, Thomas Döring wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying

[cppcheck-plugin] Unable to compile (missing sources)

2018-11-30 Thread Thomas Döring
Hi everyone, I'm trying to compile the cppcheck-plugin with the GitHub sources. The build fails because the `org.jenkinsci.plugins.cppcheck.model.*` sources are missing. [ERROR] /d:/Projects/GitHub/thomas-dee/cppcheck-plugin/src/main/java/com/