Re: Rechecking Pull Requests

2019-10-04 Thread Gavin
A lot of people is close the pr. Then wait like 30 seconds. And reopen it. On Fri., Oct. 4, 2019, 6:56 p.m. Mark Waite, wrote: > The simplest technique for me has been to use `git commit --amend` on the > most recent commit, then force push that change to the repository. There > is almost

Re: Rechecking Pull Requests

2019-10-04 Thread Mark Waite
The simplest technique for me has been to use `git commit --amend` on the most recent commit, then force push that change to the repository. There is almost always something that I can improve about the last commit in a pull request. On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:45 PM Richard Bywater wrote: > Hi >

Rechecking Pull Requests

2019-10-04 Thread Richard Bywater
Hi One of my pull requests failed on ci.jenkins.io due to what looks like an infrastructure issue ( https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Plugins/job/htmlpublisher-plugin/view/change-requests/job/PR-48/3/console ) Is there a way of getting it to re-run the build job on the PR as I don't seem to have access

Re: GitHub Actions in jenkins-infra

2019-10-04 Thread Victor Martinez
I do understand the value for using other CI/CD systems. My only concerns are when there are different GitHub checks and some of them are green and some others are red. That particular lack of reliability might imply more steps to troubleshoot to debug logs in different systems. I like the idea

Re: GitHub Actions in jenkins-infra

2019-10-04 Thread Joseph P
I prefer the freedom, why restrict as long as it benefits the project and does not create any hindrance? The reason for configuration-as-code to have both GitHub actions, Travis and ci.jenkins.io because we have experienced issues with both ci.jenkins.io and travis, so useful to being able to

Re: GitHub Actions in jenkins-infra

2019-10-04 Thread Victor Martinez
I've seen some repos already using GitHub actions, Travis and some others tools, which from a collaborator point of view doesn't look easy to follow up what GitHub checks are valuable. I'd prefer to avoid using GitHub actions as much as possible for the benefit of a more stable ci.jenkins.io

JENKINS-37557: Allow passing variables to repo SCM inside pipeline

2019-10-04 Thread Typz
Hello, I made a pull request to improve support for pipeline to the repo plugin, to support passing environment variable, but I still got no feedback. The patch is here: https://github.com/jenkinsci/repo-plugin/pull/54 Can anybody give some feedback? Best regards, -- You received this message

Failed to build https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/110

2019-10-04 Thread Charu
Hello, Infrastructure for windows seems to be broken. Could you have a look please? Getting the below messages in build log: [2019-10-04T11:05:00.301Z] Still waiting to schedule task [2019-10-04T11:05:00.301Z] Waiting for next available executor on ‘linux’ [2019-10-04T11:07:05.627Z]

Re: GitHub Actions in jenkins-infra

2019-10-04 Thread Joseph P
So right now Olbak the ACI agents are failing creating large queue. ci.jenkins.io must be stable if you want us to continue using it. On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 12:18:34 PM UTC+2, Olblak wrote: > > While I understand the value of Github Actions, I would not enable it on > jenkins-infra