Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

That's correct. The windows installer can't be built (yet) due to an issue with password expiration and the Windows Docker container. Windows users can install prior weekly releases and use the "Upgrade now" button inside Jenkins to install 2.263 on their Windows computer. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

It looks Windows release is not available - https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/issues/3892 On Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 2:48:45 PM UTC-7 Jesse Glick wrote: > For what it is worth, 2.263 seems reasonable. > https://www.jenkins.io/changelog/ shows no user complaints so far. > --

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

Yes, Jira is also fine for 2.263 On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, 23:48 Jesse Glick wrote: > For what it is worth, 2.263 seems reasonable. > https://www.jenkins.io/changelog/ shows no user complaints so far. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

For what it is worth, 2.263 seems reasonable. https://www.jenkins.io/changelog/ shows no user complaints so far. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

+1 to what Mark says. We discussed options on the table at the meeting, but that's it. Oliver was not present at the meeting, and there was not much feedback in the mailing list by the time of the meeting. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, 22:49 Mark Waite wrote: > Governance meeting >

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

Governance meeting discussion did not bless 2.263. The discussion is ongoing. New weekly release 2.263 was noted in the governance meeting and noted

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

To my knowledge it was blessed > On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:43 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > > Did the governance meeting bless 2.263, or is the debate still open? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

Did the governance meeting bless 2.263, or is the debate still open? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting, Oct 21, 2020

At this meeting we discussed the recent news, upcoming LTS baseline, status of 2020 elections, officer role updates, and the new Jenkins intro video. - Recording: *https://youtu.be/zBOwRubg7FE * - Full agenda and meeting notes:

Re: Availability of Oliver Gondža in late 2020 and onward

Congratulations on the arrival of the twins, Oliver. I'm so excited for you and your family! Thank you so much for all you've done for the project. You're a true loyal contributor :) On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:38 AM Victor Martinez < victormartinezru...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congrats Oliver for the

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

We’ve been running it in production since yesterday On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 12:52, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > My instances have been running on 2.263 since Tuesday. I have also > switched my test Jenkinsfile Runner testing setup to 2.263, and it looks > good. > > The biggest issue I see in

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

My instances have been running on 2.263 since Tuesday. I have also switched my test Jenkinsfile Runner testing setup to 2.263, and it looks good. The biggest issue I see in production is the Trilead API plugin regression in the latest versions. Not relevant to the core LTS baseline though we may

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

I've successfully switched my test environment to Jenkins 2.263. I'll continue running in that environment. It is looking good so far. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:59 AM Tim Jacomb wrote: > 2.263 is looking like the best option, so far no reports of issues in it. > > 2.263 was reverting / fixing

How to add a 'Action' in 'Status' page ?

can I add a 'Action' in 'Status' page ? can you show me some docs ? Thx~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2.263 is looking like the best option, so far no reports of issues in it. 2.263 was reverting / fixing the last of the major regressions in the previous versions. Thanks Tim On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 21:48, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I hope the today's 2.263 stabilizes the weekly release line: >

Re: Request to be added as Twitter admin

Hi Alyssa, +1 from me as well. We would benefit from having more copy editors in social media accounts. Since we have a consensus here, please reach out to Tyler to get access. Since we operate through TweetDeck, you will also need to create your personal Twitter account. See

Re: Availability of Oliver Gondža in late 2020 and onward

Hi Oliver, Thanks for all contributions you did to the project. You are totally right to step back. The adventure you are going to live is way more important and enjoyable if you free yourself from less important distractions. I wish all the best to you and your second half. Cheers On Wed,

Re: Request to be added as Twitter admin

+1 On Wed, Oct 21, 2020, at 10:49 PM, Slide wrote: > Big +1 > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:06 AM Arnaud Héritier wrote: >> +1 >> >> Le mer. 21 oct. 2020 à 19:48, Marky Jackson a >> écrit : >>> +1 from me >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Alyssa Tong wrote: Hello,