Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2020-12-28 Thread Radek Antoniuk
> > > Since the selection took place and I can see 2.263.1 in > https://www.jenkins.io/changelog-stable/, shouldn't I see 2.264.x in > https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom ? > I think that you will eventually see 2.263.x in the bom rather than 2.264.x. I'm sure that a pull

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2020-12-28 Thread Tim Jacomb
2.263 is available (and has been for awhile) it’s called bom-latest in the folder structure And is available under the 2.263.x artifact ID Thanks Tim On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 19:27, Mark Waite wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM Radek Antoniuk > wrote: > >> Since the selection

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2020-12-28 Thread Mark Waite
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM Radek Antoniuk wrote: > >>> Since the selection took place and I can see 2.263.1 in >>> https://www.jenkins.io/changelog-stable/, shouldn't I see 2.264.x in >>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom ? >>> >>> >> I think that you will eventually see 2.263.x in the bom

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2020-12-28 Thread Radek Antoniuk
> > >> Since the selection took place and I can see 2.263.1 in >> https://www.jenkins.io/changelog-stable/, shouldn't I see 2.264.x in >> https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom ? >> >> > I think that you will eventually see 2.263.x in the bom rather than > 2.264.x. I'm sure that a pull request would be

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2020-12-28 Thread Mark Waite
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 9:54 AM Radek Antoniuk wrote: > Since the selection took place and I can see 2.263.1 in > https://www.jenkins.io/changelog-stable/, shouldn't I see 2.264.x in > https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom ? > > I think that you will eventually see 2.263.x in the bom rather than

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2020-12-28 Thread Radek Antoniuk
Since the selection took place and I can see 2.263.1 in https://www.jenkins.io/changelog-stable/, shouldn't I see 2.264.x in https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom ? On Monday, 9 November 2020 at 14:06:02 UTC+1 Mark Waite wrote: > Yes, 2.263 is the selected baseline for the next Jenkins LTS. > > On

Re: Jenkins Operator (aka kubernetes-operator) Community Project's Governance: Request for Revision

2020-12-28 Thread 'Bartłomiej Antoniak' via Jenkins Developers
Hi Oleg & Jenkins board, It terms of the "Founder leader" we'd like to ensure the initial re-architecting phase goes smoothly and "representatives" actively contribute according to quality standards. Long-term we can transfer ownership of individual components to other founding leaders using

Re: Jenkins Operator (aka kubernetes-operator) Community Project's Governance: Request for Revision

2020-12-28 Thread Oleg Nenashev
Hi Bartek, Thanks for assembling the proposal! The proposal is definitely a good start. I'd guess the key topic is about the "Founder leader" role: *"Founder leader (VirtusLab): establishes project vision, controls all permissions to merge code into it, and assumes the right to speak for it in