Re: [jenkins-infra] Succession of timeouts during Docker actions on ci.jenkins.io

2022-01-10 Thread 'Jesse Glick' via Jenkins Developers
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:19 AM Chris Kilding < chris+jenk...@chriskilding.com> wrote: > kubernetes-pipeline-plugin and gitlab-plugin appear to be the 2 other > plugins under jenkinsci that use docker-maven-plugin. Is it worth advising > them to switch to Testcontainers at some point as well? > W

Re: [jenkins-infra] Succession of timeouts during Docker actions on ci.jenkins.io

2022-01-10 Thread Chris Kilding
The Moto KeyError seemed to be a one-off flake; I haven't seen it happen since then. Testcontainers seems to be working reliably enough over subsequent builds, so counting this as fixed :) kubernetes-pipeline-plugin and gitlab-plugin appear to be the 2 other plugins under jenkinsci that use doc

Re: [jenkins-infra] Succession of timeouts during Docker actions on ci.jenkins.io

2022-01-05 Thread 'Jesse Glick' via Jenkins Developers
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:41 AM Chris Kilding wrote: > Log is here: > More useful is the test stderr https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Plugins/job/aws-secrets-manager-secret-source-plugin/job/PR-37/2/testReport/io.jenkins.plugins.casc.secretsmanager/SecretSourceIT/linux_11_2_263_4___Build__linux_11_2_263

Re: [jenkins-infra] Succession of timeouts during Docker actions on ci.jenkins.io

2022-01-05 Thread Chris Kilding
I tried migrating from the docker-maven-plugin to testcontainers. The resulting code is indeed a little cleaner, and it's nice to not have to run an out-of-band step before running the test suite. Unfortunately the build still fails on ci.jenkins.io, so the underlying Docker issue is probably st

Re: [jenkins-infra] Succession of timeouts during Docker actions on ci.jenkins.io

2022-01-04 Thread Damien Duportal
Thanks for reporting and pinging us! I confirm that this timeout error is not related to the Jenkins Kubernetes plugin issue that we face on others Jenkins instances (it’s a VM agent with a Docker Engine in this case). (The "fabric8" component from the error stack was misleading @Mark ;) ). We