Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

There is a Pipeline Authoring SIG meeting tomorrow at 2PM UTC. Does anyone want to use that slot to have a discussion of the project? On Monday, March 2, 2020 at 11:32:45 AM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Hi, > > GSoC is all remote, there is no traveling required. > There are some local meetups

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi, GSoC is all remote, there is no traveling required. There are some local meetups being organized, and Google also organizes a GSoC Mentor summit where orgs can send their delegates. But these events happen outside the main GSoC timeframe, and they are optional. BR, Oleg On Saturday, Febru

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Oleg, Thanks a lot. I read all the document, all seems fine. Just, I want to be sure, I understood that traveling or attending meetings physically is not required. If these are true, then please count me in :) On Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 7:45:38 PM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Hi

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi, Thanks for your interest! It would be great to work with you on this project We have all the requirements documented here: https://jenkins.io/projects/gsoc/mentors/ It is a long read, https://jenkins.io/blog/2019/12/20/call-for-mentors/ is probably a quicker intro. TL;DR: There is no need

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Oleg, Came to my mind after I saw the Gsoc Approval. If you want/need, I will be happy to support/help you for mentoring this plugin. I do not know what are the requirements for this, just wanted to say this. Thanks. On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 9:28:44 AM UTC+1, Aytunc Beken wrote: >

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Oleg, First I want to focus on this new Pipeline As Yaml Plugin. After that, I can work in this plugin (SPPR) also. So thanks a lot for the support, I will start working on this plugin immediately. On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 2:03:32 PM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Hi Aytunc, > > -

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Aytunc, - Of course, I do not want to throw all the effort in the SPPR, I may use > some of the codes from there, if it is okay ? > As long as you follow the MIT License requirements, sure. You may also want to consider taking over this plugin or contributing to its codebase, but it is up to yo

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Vu Tuan, Thank you for the detailed information about the plugin. So in this situation, my suggestions are below. - As the SPPR plugin is not developed any more and name of the plugin do match with its purpose, starting a new plugin for PAY ( Pipeline As Yaml) will be more accurate. - Of c

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Aytunc, Thank you for reaching out to me. To give you some context, I took over this project from a GSoC project (Google Summer of Code) from a student. He was unable to finish the project on time, so I decided to take it over after GSoC to see if I can continue working on it to bring it to

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Oleg, Nice to meet you Vu Tuan. I have some doubts, may be you can help me understand things. - Why the name of the plugin is different ? Also It says it is about pull requests from various version controls. If this plugin will continue focusing on both, It will be good to separate them.

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Since you follow the existing plugin design, IMHO it would be better to just keep extending it. It is in alpha now, so there is no compatibility requirements. CC Vu Tuan who is the current maintainer BR, Oleg On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 20:04 Aytunc Beken wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > Sorry for my late resp

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Oleg, Sorry for my late response. I think the requirements you defined will make plugin more usable. So I will try to also implement those requirements. So I am planing to start working on this plugin. How should I proceed ? Thanks. On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 8:35:51 PM UTC+1, Oleg

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Aytunc, Your approach is quite similar to what is documented in my project idea. I went a bit beyond w.r.t implementation options, but the approach you suggest is one of the most straightforward ways to implement Pipeline as YAML. - Develop a Converter which will convert yml files to legacy

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi Oleg, Thanks for the details. The projects which are proposed/developed are similar what I want to achieve. However, approach may differ. What I planned was this: - Develop a Converter which will convert yml files to legacy declarative or scripted pipelines . Reason: Just wanted not to

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

UPD. I have officially submitted this project idea: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkins-pipeline-authoring-sig/Ko8KTEcK_vY and jenkins-infra/jenkins.io#2849 Hi Aytunc, what would be your plan there? the GSoC project idea does

Re: About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi, No ongoing work right now, but indeed there is a lot of interest in the community. If you are interested to work on it, this is great! Actually I am planning to submit a follow-up project idea for Google Summer of Code 2020. I have already referenced it in https://gitter.im/jenkinsci/pipel

About - Simple Pull Request Plugin

Hi, I was planning to work on a new plugin for enabling Yaml files for Pipelines. However I found this plugin and it looks similar. https://jenkins.io/blog/2018/07/17/simple-pull-request-plugin/ Does any one knows about it? Does is still continues ? Thanks. Regards -- You received this messag