Re: Adding audit logs to Jenkins

2018-10-16 Thread Matt Sicker
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 7:17 PM Jesse Glick wrote: > If you have to wonder, the answer is yes. :-) > Simple enough! -- Matt Sicker Software Engineer, CloudBees -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: Adding audit logs to Jenkins

2018-10-16 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Le mar. 16 oct. 2018 à 02:17, Jesse Glick a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 6:00 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > > I've thought about a JEP, yes. I'm not sure if the scope warrants it yet. > > If you have to wonder, the answer is yes. :-) > Heh, I like that. Proposed

Re: Adding audit logs to Jenkins

2018-10-15 Thread Jesse Glick
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 6:00 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > I've thought about a JEP, yes. I'm not sure if the scope warrants it yet. If you have to wonder, the answer is yes. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe

Re: Adding audit logs to Jenkins

2018-10-15 Thread Matt Sicker
I've thought about a JEP, yes. I'm not sure if the scope warrants it yet. I'm currently exploring this as a potential Outreachy mentorship project, so it might be a bit early still. On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:39 PM Liam Newman wrote: > Matt, > > Have you considered make a JEP for this effort?

Re: Adding audit logs to Jenkins

2018-10-15 Thread Liam Newman
Matt, Have you considered make a JEP for this effort? It seems like something that would benefit from having a design document that captures how the design was arrived at and what alternatives were considered. -Liam N. On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:28 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > I've started tasking

Re: Adding audit logs to Jenkins

2018-10-15 Thread Matt Sicker
I've started tasking out this as an epic: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-54082 On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:38 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:03 PM Daniel Beck wrote: > >> Doesn't that just mean the listeners need to improved? >> > > Either way, that would