I was attempting to get development of the plugin rolling since you hadn't
responded to anyone for at least six months, which if I understand from the
Jenkins documentation is the proper way to go about things.  The issues you
have closed are still sitting in github and haven't been published either.


https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Pull+Request+to+Repositories
What to expect

Please give us about a week to respond to your pull request. If the
repository in question is actively maintained, this is a sufficient time
span for a repository maintainer to acknowledge the pull request you sent.

If an acknowledgement happens, please try to work with the plugin
maintainer so that he/she can integrate your changes. This is probably what
you are expecting — somebody to review the pull request and merge it.

However, if your pull request doesn't seem to be getting any attention
after a week or so, then unfortunately we don't have existing developers
reviewing incoming pull requests. Perhaps the repository is not actively
maintained any more. In this case, we don't want your pull request to be in
limbo forever, and hence we'd like you to escalate as follows:

   - If you are comfortable with the change and you feel it should be
   merged in the absence of a review, please drop us an e-mail on the dev
   list <http://jenkins-ci.org/content/mailing-lists> and ask for commit
   access (please provide your GitHub account name and the repository name you
   would like to contribute to). See the later section for more information
   about what you should be careful about. As explained in Governance
   Document#Howtojointheproject
   
<https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Governance+Document#GovernanceDocument-Howtojointheproject>,
   we give out commit access to anyone who asks for it. Once the committership
   is granted, please merge the change, and consider making a new release
   <https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Hosting+Plugins>.
   - If you feel that the code really needs to be reviewed by someone more
   knowledgeable, then similarly drop us an e-mail on the dev list
   <http://jenkins-ci.org/content/mailing-lists> and tell us why/what
   should be reviewed. And hopefully one of us will be able to get to it.

In either case, please also consider "joining" the project by getting the
committership, pushing changes directly, and reviewing other inbound pull
request submissions.

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Aldrin Leal <ald...@leal.eng.br> wrote:

> Sorry David, I won't enter this discussion. I just wanted to make sure
> users were aware this is a copy driven by the pull requests which got stuck
> and got you fed up
> <https://github.com/ingenieux/awseb-deployment-plugin/pull/6> at the
> point of trying to bypass the process
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/_HEkvSTupxk>completely.
> Plus, telling others when to close tickets
> <https://github.com/ingenieux/awseb-deployment-plugin/issues/3> isn't
> very polite.
>
> Great start as a maintainer, I'd say.
>
> Those actions are being disruptive and try to take away focus on consensus
> and treating your users right.
>
> Ethics are personal. Morals I'll leave to the others in this list.
>
>
> --
> -- Aldrin Leal, <ald...@leal.eng.br>
> Master your EC2-fu! Get the latest ekaterminal public beta
> http://www.ingenieux.com.br/products/ekaterminal/
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:50 PM, David Tanner <david.joel.tan...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I have no issues with attribution.  I don't have any experience with
>> creating a duplicate plugin, and was unsure if you would even respond
>> helpfully to any of my emails after you told me off for doing anything with
>> your plugin.  I didn't fork your plugin because I thought it needed a new
>> name for the plugin so there isn't any conflicts with the current one.
>>
>> These are the emails that Aldrin sent me.  I never got the impression I
>> was harrassing him:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Aldrin Leal <ald...@leal.eng.br> wrote:
>>
>>> I just didn't like your attitude. Hard for me to translate into words. I
>>> understand I've been lagging, but at the same time, I believe your actions
>>> have been more about setting people apart than helping to build a community
>>> sense.
>>>
>>> As for that, I recommend you publish your own as a Post Build Step, as
>>> it makes sense. OTOH, I'll keep the AWS Deployment in maintenance mode.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- Aldrin Leal, <ald...@leal.eng.br>
>>> Master your EC2-fu! Get the latest ekaterminal public beta
>>> http://www.ingenieux.com.br/products/ekaterminal/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:29 PM, David Tanner <
>>> david.joel.tan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aldrin,
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure I understand what you mean?  I asked for push access
>>>> because I had a pull request on the plugin for about a month.  The policy
>>>> for plugins is if there is no response then we can ask for access.  So I
>>>> did and started working on the open issues and pull requests.
>>>>
>>>> If you would like to maintain the plugin, I am more than happy just to
>>>> submit a pull request and let you handle it.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> David Tanner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Aldrin Leal <ald...@leal.eng.br>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you fork and create your own fork and publish it instead?
>>>>>
>>>>> Considering your attitude on the github repo, I'd advise you to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -- Aldrin Leal, <ald...@leal.eng.br>
>>>>> Master your EC2-fu! Get the latest ekaterminal public beta
>>>>> http://www.ingenieux.com.br/products/ekaterminal/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:11 PM, David Tanner <
>>>>> david.joel.tan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can I be granted access to commit to this plugin?  There are some
>>>>>> features I would like add, but it appears there has been no dev activity
>>>>>> here since February.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> githubid: DavidTanner
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> David Tanner
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/Qpy7_lsZsWc/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to