Thanks, Daniel. I'll plan on proceeding with a lazy consensus decision
that from now on, we'll accept the Dependabot PRs that update detached
plugins, we'll keep the test ignored, and we won't run the ignored
test manually for Dependabot PRs. If nobody objects to this lazy
consensus decision by
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:34 PM Basil Crow wrote:
> Daniel, I am not aware of any such examples.
>
Thanks for that confirmation.
At this point I'm not entirely convinced JENKINS-69361 is real, and unless
you know more than is present in Jira, we don't understand it well enough
to act on it.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 12:33 PM 'Daniel Beck' via Jenkins Developers
wrote:
>
> Are you aware of examples of this problem other than the two Jira issues?
Daniel, I am not aware of any such examples.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8:28 PM Basil Crow wrote:
> Third, we have occasionally seen a need to mitigate the impact of
> JENKINS-69361.
> Since 2022 I have been regularly updating detached plugins, justified
> as an exception to the usual policy in order to mitigate the impact of
>
in Jenkins. Second,
Dependabot is now proposing updates to these detached plugins, and
ignoring these updates results in stagnant PRs. Third, we have
occasionally seen a need to mitigate the impact of JENKINS-69361.
Since 2022 I have been regularly updating detached plugins, justified
as an
