We had a show of hands on FOSDEM two years ago for how far people there
thought we should keep backwards compatibility. I think most thought 2
years was enough.
/B
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.paul.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 for Option 2.
Clean up old code and move
Hi,
We have agreed on new LTS baseline version as 1.580 reached its end of
life. Users can expect first RC based on 1.596 on 2015-02-04.
--
oliver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins
Developers group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Office+Hours
For those of you interested in Workflow, I wanted to talk some about
two topics people have asked me about:
· Security model: script security, permissions.
· Plugin compatibility: SimpleBuildStep and friends, custom steps, etc.
--
You
To record the session, this office hours will be done in a different from
the usual URL: https://plus.google.com/events/c4eagqodepqojlrv7glhc1ctg48
2015-01-27 12:21 GMT-08:00 Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Office+Hours
For those of you interested
Hi,
Are there any plans for supporting a downgrade to this version? I was using
normal releases but after all the 1.589 maven issues I would like to move
to LTS - but my metadata was already updated so it maybe too late (all the
existing builds are gone after downgrading).
I think supporting
Hi,
Are there any plans for supporting a downgrade to this version? I was using
normal releases but after all the 1.598 maven issues I would like to move
to LTS - but my metadata was already updated so it maybe too late (all the
existing builds are gone after downgrading).
I think supporting
Even with an up-to-date durable-task plugin, it happened again :(
I pulled the thread stack traces with the queued builds not building and then
restarted jenkins. Comparing the threads, they are nearly identical.
I've added fine logging for the NodeProvisioner, hopefully that will show
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
now jesse has signed up for a third fight
Well, I see a lot of problems with using AspectJ as well, starting
with the novel source language. I just wonder if there is any less
controversial technique that
Read the changelog.
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/JENKINS-24380+Migration
On 27.01.2015, at 23:29, Francisco Alejandro Lozano López floz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans for supporting a downgrade to this version? I was using
normal releases but after all the
Note there was another deadlock found. There is an open pull request
pending to fix that one
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015, Suckow, Thomas J thomas.suc...@pnnl.gov
wrote:
Even with an up-to-date durable-task plugin, it happened again :(
I pulled the thread stack traces with the queued builds
If you don't like AspectJ, using lombok with custom annotation processors
could do something comparable
2015-01-27 23:23 GMT+01:00 Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
now jesse has signed up for a third
Hey Jenkins Developers,
I've been interested in working on the S3 Plugin. I have two pull requests
in place:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/s3-plugin/pull/46
https://github.com/jenkinsci/s3-plugin/pull/49
I'd like to put some work in there and I have some future ideas of stuff to
improve on. Is
Sorry for the delay. I deleted the repo and created new one that isn't
branched from the jenkins repo on the same URL:
https://github.com/kralq/distinguishable-gray-balls-plugin
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Daniel Beck m...@beckweb.net wrote:
Thanks for the reminder!
I don't know what'll
+1 for Option 2.
Clean up old code and move forward.
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
maintaining backward compatibility on jenkins codebase is hard and
introduces hundred @Deprecated methods.
I've just read this article :
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:35 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
http://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/BackwardCompatibilityStrategy
and wonder if we could apply some of those recipes.
In particular the use of AspectJ sounds a lot more attractive and
powerful than the
And now jesse has signed up for a third fight... After two rounds with KK
he will have another round with me over that aspectj shite
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015, Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:35 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com javascript:;
What's wrong with ApsectJ from your pov ?
2015-01-27 18:55 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
:
And now jesse has signed up for a third fight... After two rounds with KK
he will have another round with me over that aspectj shite
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015, Jesse
17 matches
Mail list logo
