Re: GitHub and Bitbucket branch source UI refactoring

2017-08-03 Thread Tim Downey
Hi Michael -- I finally go around to upgrading as well and am facing the same problem. Have you worked around this? Are you just supplying the XML directly? On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 8:39:29 PM UTC-4, Michael Kobit wrote: > > Finally got some time to try it out (sorry!) and I know the PR

Re: [RFF] SonarQube Scanner for Jenkins 2.6

2017-03-21 Thread Tim Downey
Hi Julien, 'steps' is part of declarative pipeline which is becoming the recommendation from the Jenkins folks on how to write your Jenkinsfiles. https://jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/ Tim On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Julien HENRY wrote: > Hi, > > Can you

Re: [RFF] SonarQube Scanner for Jenkins 2.6

2017-02-22 Thread Tim Downey
Hi Julien, This is terrific, but I'm having issues. I'm trying to use this within a pipeline model definition build. I'm struggling with `waitForQualityGate`. Wherever I put it, I'm getting an exception. I've tried the `waitForQualityGate` both in the same and in separate stages. Any

Re: Adopt flowdock plugin?

2017-02-21 Thread Tim Downey
And here's the PRthanks. https://github.com/jenkinsci/flowdock-plugin/pull/27 On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 7:51:18 AM UTC-5, Tim Downey wrote: > > Thanks Oleg. I got a bounce from Antti and wasn't sure if we was still > with the company. > > Hello Mark & Antt

Re: Adopt flowdock plugin?

2017-02-21 Thread Tim Downey
t available. > > Best regards, > Oleg > > > понедельник, 20 февраля 2017 г., 19:53:10 UTC+1 пользователь Tim Downey > написал: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I wasn't sure on the process for adopting a potentially abandoned >> plugin. I'm interest in adop

Re: Questions on updating flowdock plugin to support pipeline

2016-11-08 Thread Tim Downey
, Jesse Glick <jgl...@cloudbees.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tim Downey <timothy.dow...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > under pipeline, > > traditional Notifiers would not be used and instead flow control around > > build status should be inside of t

Re: Questions on updating flowdock plugin to support pipeline

2016-11-07 Thread Tim Downey
r time, Tim On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Jesse Glick <jgl...@cloudbees.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Tim Downey <timothy.dow...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The issue is that run.getResult() is returning null even when used in a > > pipeline *after* whic

Re: Questions on updating flowdock plugin to support pipeline

2016-11-07 Thread Tim Downey
= 1L; *private* *static* String convertToString(Boolean bool) { *return* bool != *null* ? bool.toString() : *null*; } } Thanks for any help, Tim On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 5:55:55 PM UTC-4, Jesse Glick wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tim Downey <ti

Questions on updating flowdock plugin to support pipeline

2016-11-01 Thread Tim Downey
Hi, I'm working on updating the Flowdock plugin to support pipeline and am getting hung up in how to map some of the old calls to the new API. In general, I've gone through and replaced AbstractProject with Run. I've got a few hangups that I was hoping that someone with direct knowledge