On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 9:53 PM Tim Jacomb wrote:
> Is there an issue with what’s already in the calendar?
>
A one month RC period makes it more likely to have requests for post-RC
changes crop up. I'd prefer to shorten it for that reason (like Mark
suggested).
--
You received this message
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 1:53:47 PM UTC-7 Tim Jacomb wrote:
> Is there an issue with what’s already in the calendar?
>
No issue for me with the items on the Jenkins calendar. They match with
the proposed dates. Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Is there an issue with what’s already in the calendar?
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 16:32, 'wfoll...@cloudbees.com' via Jenkins
Developers wrote:
> For the delay of the LTS realease, with pleasure! :-)
>
> For the RC, no opinion.
>
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 3:53:47 PM UTC+1 Mark Waite wrote:
For the delay of the LTS realease, with pleasure! :-)
For the RC, no opinion.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 3:53:47 PM UTC+1 Mark Waite wrote:
> In the past few years, we've taken a break from our regular LTS schedule
> over the holiday season. I propose we take a break this year, though
In the past few years, we've taken a break from our regular LTS schedule
over the holiday season. I propose we take a break this year, though with
a variation from past years.
The 2.375.1 LTS release is scheduled for Nov 30. Four weeks after that
would be Dec 28. I propose that we move the
