[JIRA] (JENKINS-50210) Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap

2018-03-15 Thread damien.viniere-exter...@gemalto.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Damien Viniere updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50210  
 
 
  Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Damien Viniere  
 
 
Attachment: 
 Jenkinsfile  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50210) Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap

2018-03-15 Thread damien.viniere-exter...@gemalto.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Damien Viniere updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50210  
 
 
  Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Damien Viniere  
 
 
Attachment: 
 Jenkinsfile  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50060) Workspace error when setting stage level agent when global agent specified.

2018-03-15 Thread matthewcer...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 M C commented on  JENKINS-50060  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Workspace error when setting stage level agent when global agent specified.
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Trying the above results in the same issue. What did work was this: 

 

podTemplate(label: buildId(),
  containers: [.]) {

  node(buildId()) {
container('node') {
...
}
  }
}

node('docker1') {
   ...
} 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41569) Pipeline hangs waiting for resume on an agent which never was

2018-03-15 Thread che...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Chenyang Liu closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-41569  
 
 
  Pipeline hangs waiting for resume on an agent which never was   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Chenyang Liu  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49582) uninformative "Failure" error message when publish-over-ssh fails due to disk space on destination

2018-03-15 Thread slide.o....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Earl commented on  JENKINS-49582  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: uninformative "Failure" error message when publish-over-ssh fails due to disk space on destination   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 There really isn't anything in the call stack that would allow me to tell the user that the disk space is low.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49746) Regex returns more matches than it should if errors are close together

2018-03-15 Thread slide.o....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Earl commented on  JENKINS-49746  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Regex returns more matches than it should if errors are close together   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Richard Wilkinson The code you were referencing is from a very old version of email-ext. What is the expected output that you are looking for from the err.txt you posted? 

 

ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion some_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion yet_another_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion some_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion yet_another_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion some_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion yet_another_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion some_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion yet_another_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion some_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion yet_another_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion some_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed
A MESSAGE
ncsim: *E,ASRTST (some_string): (some_time) Assertion yet_another_location has failed
ncsim: *W,ASRTST (some_other_string): (some_time) Assertion some_other_location has failed

[JIRA] (JENKINS-32568) Add custom-data to Azure slave deployment

2018-03-15 Thread che...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Chenyang Liu closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 It's a very old issue. If there's also a problem in the latest plugin, please feel free to reopen and leave commends.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-32568  
 
 
  Add custom-data to Azure slave deployment   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Chenyang Liu  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-30014) Builds hang, Jenkins still browseable

2018-03-15 Thread che...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Chenyang Liu closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 It's a very old problem. If there's also a issue in the latest plugin, please feel free to reopen and leave commends  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-30014  
 
 
  Builds hang, Jenkins still browseable   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Chenyang Liu  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

[JIRA] (JENKINS-49986) Pipeline 'bat' hangs on ws with forward slash path separator

2018-03-15 Thread plebm...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Wade Baglin commented on  JENKINS-49986  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline 'bat' hangs on ws with forward slash path separator   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Possibly a duplicate of JENKINS-50025  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-48253) Empty list of existing Storage Account Names

2018-03-15 Thread che...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Chenyang Liu commented on  JENKINS-48253  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Empty list of existing Storage Account Names   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Billy Sheppard You need to do some change in storageAccountType or ResourceGroupName to let Jenkins UI to reload the existing storage account.  Or you can save your configuration and reopen the global configuration, then the account will also be reloaded.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49107) Deployments to resource groups are never cleaned up, resource group eventually refuses further deployments, plugin stops working

2018-03-15 Thread che...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Chenyang Liu closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 It should be fixed in 0.6.0. If the issue also exists, please leave comment.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49107  
 
 
  Deployments to resource groups are never cleaned up, resource group eventually refuses further deployments, plugin stops working   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Chenyang Liu  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-49473) Unable to delete Azure VM Agent from Jenkins after having deleted agent directly on Azure

2018-03-15 Thread che...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Chenyang Liu commented on  JENKINS-49473  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Unable to delete Azure VM Agent from Jenkins after having deleted agent directly on Azure   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Seems you had deleted the cloud in configuration at that time, so got a NullPointerException. Did you meet the same issue later.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50210) Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap

2018-03-15 Thread jenkins...@carlossanchez.eu (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Carlos Sanchez commented on  JENKINS-50210  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 There's already another issue going into detail of overprovisioning  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50210) Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap

2018-03-15 Thread jenkins...@carlossanchez.eu (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Carlos Sanchez edited a comment on  JENKINS-50210  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 There's already another issue going into detail of overprovisioning  iirc  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49686) NPE in CPS VM thread at WorkflowRun$GraphL.onNewHead

2018-03-15 Thread svano...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sam Van Oort started work on  JENKINS-49686  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Sam Van Oort  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread svano...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sam Van Oort commented on  JENKINS-50199  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Mike Kozell The NPEs you see look like a duplicate of https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-49686 which I am investigating right now.  May I please request the following diagnostic information: 1. Please can you attach both the config.xml for the job and a build.xml for one or more Pipelines that experienced this issue.  2. In the build's 'workflow' directory, there's a flownodeStore.xml file - please can you GZIP it and attach it.  3. Can I request the last part of the build log for these builds (the final parts indicating build completed and anything after that).  4. Are all the Pipelines experiencing issues making use of parallels? 5. Do you have any fairly simple pipelines that will reproduce the issues, which you can provide code for? There's also fix in workflow-cps plugin 2.46 for some issues with Resume Disabled - without that fix there may be odd behaviors if the Resume Disable flag is modified after the build begins. If this has happened, the fix there will help and after gathering the above information, I would suggest installing this update and seeing if issues recur when Resume Disabled in on.  If that does not resolve the resume issue, it may be necessary to toggle this option OFF for the meantime:  

Do not allow the pipeline to resume if the master restarts": Enabled on all jobs
 We hope to have a hotfix available soon to at least try out. Thank you  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50210) Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap

2018-03-15 Thread damien.viniere-exter...@gemalto.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Damien Viniere created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50210  
 
 
  Kubernetes agent provisioned regardless of container cap   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Carlos Sanchez  
 
 
Attachments: 
 Jenkinsfile, jenklogs.txt  
 
 
Components: 
 kubernetes-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-16 02:20  
 
 
Environment: 
 kubernetes v1.6.1  Jenkins: v2.89.4 & v2.89.2  kubernetes-plugin: v1.3.2 & v1.3.1  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Damien Viniere  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, My teams and I are currently facing an issue with the provisioning of slaves with the kubernetes-plugin using podTemplate that always go higher than the limitation we try to set. We need to run multiple (tens to hundreds depending on the job) slaves in parallel, that will be doing the same task, and thus we create them with the same pod template. Those slaves will run with a heavy CPU workload, so we need to limit the amount of attributed CPU to each of them, but also to set a "container cap" to limit the number of them running at the same time. (because we can not lower the CPU limit too much). We then decided a Container cap of 7 for our first runs, to see what happens. That where the problems arose. First, we saw that the cap was not respected strictly, as sometimes, 8 or 9 of them were running at the same time. This is not critical, we can always work with that if we remember it. Where is the real issue I want to address:  We figured that after our first batch of ~7 finish, Jenkins will provision, at the same time, a huge amount of slaves, without consideration of the container cap. To illustrate that, I recreated a simple scenario to replicate the issue, 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread svano...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sam Van Oort updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50199  
 
 
  Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Sam Van Oort  
 
 
Priority: 
 Critical Major  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread andrew.ba...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Andrew Bayer assigned an issue to Sam Van Oort  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50199  
 
 
  Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Andrew Bayer  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Sam Van Oort  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-45480) GIT Build with Parameters is not listing branches

2018-03-15 Thread brodlic.e...@nsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Edin Brodlic commented on  JENKINS-45480  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: GIT Build with Parameters is not listing branches   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Can also confirm, having an identical issue. Seems to revolve around Git parameter plugin. Weirdly enough I've tracked the git ls-remote process as well as temporary sh file that triggers the ssh, and it's all executed on the Jenkins main, not sure why it happens only when the actual build is supposed to take place on a Windows agent (we have two, with different configurations and both suddenly started having the issue). Also not sure why there is an ssh command executing `git-upload-pack` right after the ls-remote action only when it's being executed via parameter plugin. Git Plugin -->3.3.0 Git Parameter Plugin-->0.8.0  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50054) Dependencies trigger not working when depend on none primary packaging type

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc started work on  JENKINS-50054  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Cyrille Le Clerc  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50054) Dependencies trigger not working when depend on none primary packaging type

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc commented on  JENKINS-50054  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Dependencies trigger not working when depend on none primary packaging type   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Bing Shiao did you test with pipeline-maven-3.4.1 or more recent? Your problem should be fixed. Thank you very much for the detailed issue with the maven-spy logs, it was very easy for me to capture the context.   https://github.com/jenkinsci/pipeline-maven-plugin/releases/tag/pipeline-maven-3.4.1  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50209) Cobertura Plugin Succeeds When It Should Fail

2018-03-15 Thread brianau...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Brian Auron created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50209  
 
 
  Cobertura Plugin Succeeds When It Should Fail   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 cobertura-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-16 00:01  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins 2.99  Cobertura Plugin 1.12  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Brian Auron  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 When the coverage report is generated, it only fails a job for a given code state once if the coverage values are outside of the configured levels and `Mark Unhealthy as failed` is checked. For example, a coverage of git sha abcdef with Package Coverage set to Unhealthy below 80% and actual coverage at 73% will fail once. If the job is run again targeting the same git sha (abcdef) without changing the Coverage acceptance levels, the job will succeed even though Package Coverage is still at 73% and should be marked as Unhealthy (and fail).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

   

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50128) LDAP permissions working for users but not groups

2018-03-15 Thread sgardner...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Steven Gardner closed an issue as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50128  
 
 
  LDAP permissions working for users but not groups   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Steven Gardner  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50208) 10min timeout for user built plugins

2018-03-15 Thread jason.ray.hod...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jason Hodges created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50208  
 
 
  10min timeout for user built plugins   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 plugin-proposals  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 23:18  
 
 
Labels: 
 jenkins pipeline plugin timeout  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Jason Hodges  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We are building a plugin for Jenkins to call a blue/green deployer that we created. For some of our larger Node apps we are running into a hard 10min timeout when calling our plugin. We are able to adjust the timeout from 0-10 mins but anything after that we get a failed pipeline. I've seen a similar issue with the Git plugin but they were able to get around the issues. We've tried several different libraries for handling the call to our blue/greener but we run in to the same issue. Any help would be great, thanks.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-46612) jobDSL doesn't adds shared libraries to folder when in pipeline

2018-03-15 Thread m...@daniel-spilker.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Spilker resolved as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-46612  
 
 
  jobDSL doesn't adds shared libraries to folder when in pipeline   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Spilker  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49199) Job DSL Authorizarion Matrix cannot manage the folder inheritance

2018-03-15 Thread m...@daniel-spilker.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Spilker assigned an issue to Daniel Beck  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49199  
 
 
  Job DSL Authorizarion Matrix cannot manage the folder inheritance   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Spilker  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Daniel  Spilker  Beck  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49892) Evaluate options for collecting "method instrumentation" telemetry

2018-03-15 Thread jenkins...@carlossanchez.eu (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Carlos Sanchez commented on  JENKINS-49892  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Evaluate options for collecting "method instrumentation" telemetry   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Fine with me for starters  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49199) Job DSL Authorizarion Matrix cannot manage the folder inheritance

2018-03-15 Thread m...@daniel-spilker.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Spilker updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49199  
 
 
  Job DSL Authorizarion Matrix cannot manage the folder inheritance   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Spilker  
 
 
Component/s: 
 matrix-auth-plugin  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49686) NPE in CPS VM thread at WorkflowRun$GraphL.onNewHead

2018-03-15 Thread svano...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sam Van Oort commented on  JENKINS-49686  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: NPE in CPS VM thread at WorkflowRun$GraphL.onNewHead   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 So here's what I've got from digging (mostly to save my notes and provide transparency in case someone else sees something): The build nominally completed with a failure (tests failed, and you ran an Error step which was not caught) in FlowEndNode ID 1692 But somehow the build.xml shows: 1696 1693:1696 (flowHead id : flowNodeId for that head) And there are no flowNodes after 1692 in the storage.  So what I'm trying to figure out is: 
 
How did the iota, head, and finalFlowNode ID get bumped above 1692? 
Does this occur with simpler builds? Or does it only happen when there's some specific structure including parallels (as with this one)? 
Why are we even trying to resume the build? We're done, kaput, finished, finito! The FlowEndNode has been written, and build ended with Failure result (as it should). 
 This points to an issue specifically with the closedown of the build or checks on whether we need to resume the build (i.e. finished build showing as incomplete).  The second part first: there's a 'done' flag on the CpsFlowExecution which if true marks the execution as complete. ODDLY this is absent in the persisted build record, and that appears to be normal somehow (going back to v2.0 of this plugin it is not persisted by the ConverterImpl that does marshall/unmarshall).  Failing that, we look for having just a single head FlowNode (check!) and that head being a FlowEndNode (should have been the case?) Now for the end-of-build log: the execution sets itself to 'done' (which is not persisted, since that logic was not changed), sets the stored heads to just the first head (should be the FlowEndNode), and the flushes FlowNode storage. However, the WorkflowRun saves itself when done.  Possible solutions: 1. Explicitly save 'done' in the flowExecution 2. Figure out why the FlowEndNode isn't ending up as the final head for the CpsFlowExecution thus signalling we're done done done.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-49787) Jenkins.createProjectFromXml() formats xml differently than AbstractItem.save()

2018-03-15 Thread m...@daniel-spilker.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Spilker assigned an issue to Stefan Brausch  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49787  
 
 
  Jenkins.createProjectFromXml() formats xml differently than AbstractItem.save()   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Spilker  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Daniel Spilker Stefan Brausch  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-38397) Regarding aws device farm error

2018-03-15 Thread m...@daniel-spilker.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Spilker resolved as Cannot Reproduce  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Provide a minimal script that reproduced the problem. Use markup to properly format the script so that it's human readable.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-38397  
 
 
  Regarding aws device farm error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Spilker  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Cannot Reproduce  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50014) Failed to retrieve git references (java.lang.NullPointerException on git parameter)

2018-03-15 Thread klim...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Boguslaw Klimas commented on  JENKINS-50014  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Failed to retrieve git references (java.lang.NullPointerException on git parameter)   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I can't reproduce this issue. You really don't have any interested information after 'Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException'? Eg. Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at net.uaznia.lukanus.hudson.plugins.gitparameter.GitParameterDefinition$DescriptorImpl.doFillValueItems(GitParameterDefinition.java:) Could you atached some more logs or configuration the job, in which this problem occurred? I understud that this issue occured after update git-parameter plugin? have you update any other plugin? (git-plugin, git-client-plugin, ...)?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50198) node config gets overridden when spinning up node via Ec2 plugin

2018-03-15 Thread daniel.marsh...@argos.co.uk (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Dan Marshall commented on  JENKINS-50198  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: node config gets overridden when spinning up node via Ec2 plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Yes, every job has either the ‘general’ or ‘devops’ label, but because we share this jenkins instance with developers who shouldn’t be able to run on the ‘devops’ node we need to restrict it at the node level.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42519) Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up

2018-03-15 Thread stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Stephen Connolly commented on  JENKINS-42519  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Now if we have the order different: 

 

$ git remote add origin g...@git.example.com:/development.git
$ git remote add production g...@git.example.com:/production.git
$ git fetch origin feature-1
$ git push origin :feature-1
$ git push production feature-1
 

 In this case, it is even more critical that we do not delete the branch immediately as if we followed Joshua Noble's suggestion the job history would be erased by the origin branch being deleted and then the production branch would be starting from build #1 again.   If the user actually wants the build history reset, then all they need to do is use the Jenkins UI to delete the dead branch before doing the push of the branch to production  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42519) Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up

2018-03-15 Thread stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Stephen Connolly resolved as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 It is not possible with the design of the API to know if the event means that the job should be deleted or if a lower priority source in the multibranch project has already received an event for the same branch being created because the branch is being moved from one source to another. e.g. if you configure two sources in the same multibranch: 
 
g...@git.example.com:/development.git 
 
 
g...@git.example.com:/production.git 
 Now suppose you do something like: 

 

$ git remote add origin g...@git.example.com:/development.git
$ git remote add production g...@git.example.com:/production.git
$ git fetch origin feature-1
$ git push production feature-1
$ git push origin :feature-1 

 So what happens if we follow Joshua Noble's suggestion is 
 
Jenkins gets the event from "production" saying "new branch 'feature-1'" and we say: "cool, but development is higher in the list of sources and already owns that branch name... I'll just drop that event on the floor" 
Jenkins gets the event from "development" saying "branch 'feature-1' has been deleted" and we'd delete the job and its history. 
 So you would lose all the job history of feature-1 being developed. What happens currently is as follows: 
 
Jenkins gets the event from "production" saying "new branch 'feature-1'" and we say: "cool, but development is higher in the list of sources and already owns that branch name... I'll just drop that event on the floor" 
Jenkins gets the event from "development" saying "branch 'feature-1' has been deleted" and we mark the branch as dead. 
If there is a subsequent event from "production" we let that event "take over" the branch, and all is good, history retained. 
When the scan comes along, we get the full list of branches from each source in priority order and we assign the branch to "production" as a live branch, because the revision is the same, we don't trigger a rebuild 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-42519  
 
 
  Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up   
 

  
 
 
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-37491) Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes

2018-03-15 Thread stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Stephen Connolly closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Resolution: 
 
Install Basic Branch Build Strategies plugin and add the "Change Requests" with "Ignore rebuilding merge branches when only the target branch changed" selected to your build strategies 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-37491  
 
 
  Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Stephen Connolly  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-37491) Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes

2018-03-15 Thread stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Stephen Connolly commented on  JENKINS-37491  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 For the record, if you want to avoid triggering rebuilds when just the target branch of the PR has changed then you want https://github.com/jenkinsci/basic-branch-build-strategies-plugin/blob/master/docs/user.adoc#change-requests    IMHO this problem is closed by the feature "Ignore rebuilding merge branches when only the target branch changed" in the Basic Branch Build Strategy plugin's "Change Requests" strategy  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-45693) Apply ConsoleLogFilter

2018-03-15 Thread m_win...@gmx.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Markus Winter edited a comment on  JENKINS-45693  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Apply ConsoleLogFilter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The drawback of doing it in {{LogActionImpl.stream}} is that this will not capture the complete output. What is missing is the started and finished messages from the listener and the intermediate output with the prefix. While the prefixed output is probably not that important, having the started by and the finished message when for example using the logstash plugin  I would consider important . Not sure if JENKINS-38381 would solve that.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49893) Declarative directive snippet generator

2018-03-15 Thread andrew.ba...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Andrew Bayer commented on  JENKINS-49893  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Declarative directive snippet generator   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 So the stage form asks you to choose either steps or parallel, and then outputs something similar to that. We can tweak the commented help text if desired.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49893) Declarative directive snippet generator

2018-03-15 Thread atay...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Taylor updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49893  
 
 
  Declarative directive snippet generator   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Alex Taylor  
 
 
Attachment: 
 Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 4.59.02 PM.png  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49893) Declarative directive snippet generator

2018-03-15 Thread atay...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Taylor commented on  JENKINS-49893  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Declarative directive snippet generator   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Andrew Bayer   One other suggestion towards this issue would be to not have required "generated code" but maybe have inline help for the basics of the generation much like the Parallel step inside of the current Snippet Generator     
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50207) Transient error "container [*] does not exist in pod"

2018-03-15 Thread mmalet...@shoprunner.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michael Maletich created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50207  
 
 
  Transient error "container [*] does not exist in pod"   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Carlos Sanchez  
 
 
Components: 
 kubernetes-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 20:57  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Michael Maletich  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 About 1 in every 4 of our builds dies with the error "container [] does not exist in pod []".  Rerunning the build usually fixes the error.   

 
podTemplate(label: 'docker-node',
containers: [
containerTemplate(name: 'python2', image: 'python:2.7.14', ttyEnabled: true, command: 'cat')
]
) {
node('docker-node') {
container('python2') {
checkout scm
stage("Setup") {
sh("pip install -r dev-requirements.txt")
}
stage("Lint") {
sh("make pep8")
}
stage("Tests") {
sh("make tests")
}
switch (env.BRANCH_NAME) {
case "master":
stage('Publish Package') {
withCredentials([[$class: 'UsernamePasswordMultiBinding', credentialsId: 'artifactory_jenkins',
usernameVariable: 'USERNAME', passwordVariable: 'PASSWORD']]) {
sh("printf '[distutils]\nindex-servers = local\n\n[local]\nusername: $USERNAME\npassword: %s' '$PASSWORD' > ~/.pypirc")
sh("python setup.py bdist_wheel upload -r local")
}
}
}
}
}
}

Running version 1.1.3 of the kubernetes plugin on Jenkins 2.89.4.

Happy to append any logs that might be necessary. 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
   

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50099) Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc commented on  JENKINS-50099  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Thanks for the kind word Hartmut Benz. I don't know yet how we will be able to discover these runtime dependencies as they seem to not be catch by the org.apache.maven.project.DependencyResolutionResult event we are tracking.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50176) Locked resources using the variable parameter do not get reset to the variable once released to another requester and only appear as null on subsequent locks

2018-03-15 Thread tskrai...@icloud.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tom Skrainar commented on  JENKINS-50176  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Locked resources using the variable parameter do not get reset to the variable once released to another requester and only appear as null on subsequent locks   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Observing the same issue as well.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread guillecas...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 guillermo casco commented on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 ok will try that, thank you for for your help! Regards.-  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41940) Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies

2018-03-15 Thread jaysp...@amazon.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jay Spang edited a comment on  JENKINS-41940  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Just commenting that this is a feature we want as well. We used to use the [Heavy Job Plugin|https://plugins.jenkins.io/heavy-job], which did exactly what we need. We had to leave it behind when moving to pipelines. :(Our Jenkins instance has ~30 jobs, and almost all of them are relatively lightweight and can run in parallel with other jobs. However, 2-3 of them are large C++ compiles, which are very resource intensive and should NOT share the node with other jobs.  In this situation, my choices are...1) Give my nodes only 1 executor. This results in lots of wasted capacity, as I have to spin up LOTS of nodes to ensure I can meet peak demand.   2) Give my nodes multiple executors. This results in frequent "slow builds" as Jenkins occasionally decides to run 2 compiles on the same node.Being able to say "this job is heavy and cannot share a node" would mitigate these pain points.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41940) Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies

2018-03-15 Thread jaysp...@amazon.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jay Spang commented on  JENKINS-41940  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Just commenting that this is a feature we want as well. We used to use the Heavy Job Plugin, which did exactly what we need. We had to leave it behind when moving to pipelines.  Our Jenkins instance has ~30 jobs, and almost all of them are relatively lightweight and can run in parallel with other jobs. However, 2-3 of them are large C++ compiles, which are very resource intensive and should NOT share the node with other jobs. In this situation, my choices are... 1) Give my nodes only 1 executor. This results in lots of wasted capacity, as I have to spin up LOTS of nodes to ensure I can meet peak demand. 2) Give my nodes multiple executors. This results in frequent "slow builds" as Jenkins occasionally decides to run 2 compiles on the same node. Being able to say "this job is heavy and cannot share a node" would mitigate these pain points.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50095) Remoting should check the "Remoting-Minimum-Version" header when connecting to the master

2018-03-15 Thread gautam.abhishe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Abhishek Gautam assigned an issue to Abhishek Gautam  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50095  
 
 
  Remoting should check the "Remoting-Minimum-Version" header when connecting to the master   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Abhishek Gautam  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Abhishek Gautam  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread mkoz...@magento.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mike Kozell updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50199  
 
 
  Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mike Kozell  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h2. SetupJenkins v2.89.4 LTS Pipeline API Plugin: 2.26 Pipeline Nodes and Processes Plugin: 2.19 Durable Task Plugin: 1.18 Pipeline Job Plugin: 2.17 Pipeline Shared Groovy Libraries Plugin: 2.9 Pipeline Supporting APIs Plugin: 2.18 Pipeline Groovy Plugin: 2.45 Script Security Plugin: 1.41Pipeline Default Speed/Durability Level: Performance-Optimized "Do not allow the pipeline to resume if the master restarts": Enabled on all jobsh2. ProblemI logged into a Jenkins master and saw no builds running but there was a queue of about 10 jobs. When mousing over the queued jobs, I saw "pending - Already running 2 builds across all nodes". This is strange because no jobs were showing as running and no Jenkins agents or executors were showing any running builds.I then ran "http://xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/computer/api/xml?tree=computer[executors[currentExecutable[url]],oneOffExecutors[currentExecutable[url]]]=//url=builds" which did show 5 builds were running. I checked these builds and they were red (failure) and were not running.h2. ResearchI checked the console log of a build that showed as running but isn't and saw the line below near the top of the log._*Resume disabled by user, switching to high-performance, low-durability mode.*_At the end of the of the log I saw the following:*_Finished: FAILURE_* *_Resuming build at Tue Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 after Jenkins restart_*h2. Why Resume Build?The build failed on *Mar 12, 2018 6:02:37 PM*.  +Why did the build try to resume almost a day later+? The job and system durability are configured to not resume builds. Below are some details taken from the API for the build._class "hudson.model.OneOffExecutor" id "41" keepLog false number 41 queueId 7178 result "FAILURE" timestamp 1520877757466I checked the Java process on the server and it was last restarted on *March 02 2018*.+What triggered the "Jenkins restart" identified on Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 since the Java process was not restarted?++Why does this get the build stuck in a "running" state when it's not running?+h2. ScopeThis issue can be seen across many of our Jenkins masters. In each case we see "Resuming build at x after Jenkins restart" occur a few days after the build failure or abort even though Java was not restarted. This issue didn't occur on Jenkins 2.60.3 running the older (pre-durability configurable) Pipeline plugins.h2. LogsI checked the jenkins.log file and saw the following when the build was attempting to be resumed. {code:java}Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution onLoad WARNING: Pipeline state not properly persisted, cannot resume job/JENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42/ Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService reportProblem WARNING: Unexpected exception in CPS VM thread: CpsFlowExecution[OwnerJENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42:JENKINS-JOB-NAME1 #42] java.lang.NullPointerException at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50099) Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay

2018-03-15 Thread hartmut.benz+jenk...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Hartmut Benz commented on  JENKINS-50099  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
   The work-around certainly makes the war-overlay being triggered after the war.jar has been built - thank you for that already. During the weekend, I will study which other effects the change from 'runtime' to 'compile' has on the generated artifact and post the results here. Thanks again for your support  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite edited a comment on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~yiyito] multi-branch Pipelines do not require docker and are much less messy than a single job which switches between different branches.  Refer to the [simpler  multi-branch Pipeline tutorial| tutorial https://jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/multibranch/#creating-a-multibranch-pipeline ] for an example of how easy it is.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite commented on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 guillermo casco multi-branch Pipelines do not require docker and are much less messy than a single job which switches between different branches. Refer to the [simpler multi-branch Pipeline tutorial|tutorial] for an example of how easy it is.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread guillecas...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 guillermo casco commented on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 ok and the last one:  
 
Use a Freestyle job instead of a single Pipeline job and allow it to manage the branch checkout. Then the user can select from a pick list to choose the branch they want to build 
 Is this better? is the branch checkout management UI configured through jenkins console?  first option you said involves docker and other stuff to configure and looks a little bit messy. Doable, but messy  thanks budy  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-45693) Apply ConsoleLogFilter

2018-03-15 Thread m_win...@gmx.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Markus Winter commented on  JENKINS-45693  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Apply ConsoleLogFilter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The drawback of doing it in LogActionImpl.stream is that this will not capture the complete output. What is missing is the started and finished messages from the listener and the intermediate output with the prefix. While the prefixed output is probably not that important, having the started by and the finished message when for example using the logstash plugin. Not sure if JENKINS-38381 would solve that.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite commented on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Refer to the "Build a multibranch project" tutorial to see the difference between the job you have defined which uses a single job and switches between branches with that single job, and a multi-branch Pipeline which automatically creates a job per branch.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread guillecas...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 guillermo casco commented on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 what do you mean multibranch? Is already a multibranch pipeline. Master branch has a  groovy file which perform some steps inside the job (compile, build, etc), and the branch I created has another groovy which implement those same steps as master and also others I´m adding (compile, build, run tests, etc). Maybe yo refer to this option? adding more branches in there? check image.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread guillecas...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 guillermo casco updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50131  
 
 
  git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 guillermo casco  
 
 
Attachment: 
 br.JPG  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50206) Allow plain text for credentialsId field.

2018-03-15 Thread oscar.rom...@hpe.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oscar Romero created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50206  
 
 
  Allow plain text for credentialsId field.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Improvement  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Colin   
 
 
Components: 
 marathon-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 19:34  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Oscar Romero  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Allow plain text for credentialsId field. instead of doing this:  credentialsId: 'my_cred_id'  I could do: credentialsId: '{"login_endpoint":"http://leader.mesos/acs/api/v1/auth/login","private_key":"-BEGIN PRIVATE KEY\n\n---END PRIVATE KEY\n","scheme":"RS256","uid":"jenkins-principal"}',     
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50005) WARNING: Process leaked file descriptors. See https://jenkins.io/redirect/troubleshooting/process-leaked-file-descriptors for more information

2018-03-15 Thread syaramad...@scrippsnetworks.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 suryatej yaramada commented on  JENKINS-50005  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: WARNING: Process leaked file descriptors. See https://jenkins.io/redirect/troubleshooting/process-leaked-file-descriptors for more information   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After upgrading jenkins to LTS version along with plugin updates we are not seeing those errors so far  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50099) Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc edited a comment on  JENKINS-50099  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~benzht] problem identified ^^. Workaround: declare the war dependency of your overlay project with a scope "compile" instead of a scope "runtime". could this be acceptable for you?  Solving JENKINS-50205 will solve this issue.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50205) "runtime" scope dependencies are not tracked

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50205  
 
 
  "runtime" scope dependencies are not tracked   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Cyrille Le Clerc  
 
 
Components: 
 pipeline-maven-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 18:52  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Cyrille Le Clerc  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 "runtime" scope dependencies are not tracked.   See  
 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-50099?focusedCommentId=332160=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-332160 
 * https://gist.github.com/cyrille-leclerc/bcb8e7d078570b7f7867eb55d0ed647c  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50194) Build userId missing for a job being built by other Jobs

2018-03-15 Thread naresh.rayap...@yahoo.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Naresh Rayapati updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50194  
 
 
  Build userId missing for a job being built by other Jobs   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Naresh Rayapati  
 
 
Summary: 
 Child Builds Build userId missing for a job being built by other Jobs  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50099) Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc commented on  JENKINS-50099  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hartmut Benz problem identified ^^.  Workaround: declare the war dependency of your overlay project with a scope "compile" instead of a scope "runtime". could this be acceptable for you?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50194) Child Builds

2018-03-15 Thread naresh.rayap...@yahoo.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Naresh Rayapati updated  JENKINS-50194  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50194  
 
 
  Child Builds   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Naresh Rayapati  
 
 
Status: 
 In  Progress  Review  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50194) Child Builds

2018-03-15 Thread naresh.rayap...@yahoo.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Naresh Rayapati commented on  JENKINS-50194  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Child Builds   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 PR: https://github.com/jenkinsci/jira-steps-plugin/pull/65 Matvey Kondratev Thanks for reporting this, it is been a while that I wanted to fix this.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50194) Child Builds

2018-03-15 Thread naresh.rayap...@yahoo.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Naresh Rayapati started work on  JENKINS-50194  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Naresh Rayapati  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50099) Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc edited a comment on  JENKINS-50099  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Reproducing a test case with*  [  https://github.com/cyrille-leclerc/my-war-overlay.git ] *  [  https://github.com/cyrille-leclerc/my-war.git ] The runtime dependency of the overlay does NOT appear in the list of resolved dependencies of the maven project. Probably because it is flagged as a runtime dependency. [ https://gist.github.com/cyrille-leclerc/bcb8e7d078570b7f7867eb55d0ed647c ]The maven-war-plugin overlay docs clearly recommends to use a "runtime" scopehttps://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/overlays.html{code:xml}  com.example.projects  documentedprojectdependency  1.0-SNAPSHOT  war  runtime...  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50099) Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay

2018-03-15 Thread clecl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Cyrille Le Clerc edited a comment on  JENKINS-50099  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Downstream pipelines are not triggered when the artifact is a a WAR and consumed by war-overlay   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Reproducing a test case with* https://github.com/cyrille-leclerc/my-war-overlay.git* https://github.com/cyrille-leclerc/my-war.git The runtime dependency of the overlay does NOT appear in the list of resolved dependencies of the maven project. Probably because it is flagged as a runtime dependency.https://gist.github.com/cyrille-leclerc/bcb8e7d078570b7f7867eb55d0ed647c  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50204) Visualization of the credentials backed by Kubernetes secrets in Jenkins Credentials UI

2018-03-15 Thread jn...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 James Nord created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50204  
 
 
  Visualization of the credentials backed by Kubernetes secrets in Jenkins Credentials UI   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  New Feature  
 
 
Assignee: 
 James Nord  
 
 
Components: 
 kubernetes-credentials-provider-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 18:33  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 James Nord  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We want to know which credentials have been loaded by the credentials-provider-for-kubernetes-secrets. The UI should display the available credentials (in read only mode)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50203) plugiun bundles jackson stuff

2018-03-15 Thread jn...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 James Nord created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50203  
 
 
  plugiun bundles jackson stuff   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Task  
 
 
Assignee: 
 James Nord  
 
 
Components: 
 kubernetes-credentials-provider-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 18:27  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 James Nord  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 the following jars are bundled inside the plugin, they should really be removed and replaced with the jackson2-api plugin 
 
jackson-annotations-2.7.0.jar 
jackson-core-2.7.7.jar 
jackson-databind-2.7.7.jar 
jackson-dataformat-yaml-2.7.7.jar 
jackson-module-jaxb-annotations-2.7.5.jar 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite edited a comment on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~yiyito] until that bug is fixed, I think your choices are:* Use a multi-branch Pipeline instead of a single Pipeline job and allow it to manage the branch checkout.  Multi-branch Pipeline will create a job for each branch that contains a Jenkinsfile and will remove those jobs when the branch is deleted.  Then there is no need to select from pick lists  are  to  choose  values  branches since all the branches that contain a Jenkinsfile are always built * Use a Freestyle job instead of a single Pipeline job and allow it to manage the branch checkout.  Then the user can select from a pick list to choose the branch they want to build  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite commented on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 guillermo casco until that bug is fixed, I think your choices are: 
 
Use a multi-branch Pipeline instead of a single Pipeline job and allow it to manage the branch checkout. Multi-branch Pipeline will create a job for each branch that contains a Jenkinsfile and will remove those jobs when the branch is deleted. Then there is no need to select from pick lists are choose values 
Use a Freestyle job instead of a single Pipeline job and allow it to manage the branch checkout. Then the user can select from a pick list to choose the branch they want to build 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50131) git parameter

2018-03-15 Thread guillecas...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 guillermo casco commented on  JENKINS-50131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: git parameter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
  Ok, so if this can´t be done with the plug in, how can I achieve running a JOB but instead of running master branch from repo, to be run from a different branch. I don´t want to modify master because is being used for the today´s deploys. I created a different branch, Now How can I do a checkout to that branch and using it when running the job in jenkins? Has to be a way or not? Mark Waite, Boguslaw Klimas ? I don´t know how to do this, please help!   Thank you  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49682) Blue Ocean - hangs after selecting github organization

2018-03-15 Thread alex.krav...@roivant.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Kravetz commented on  JENKINS-49682  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Blue Ocean - hangs after selecting github organization   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Vivek Pandey, Thank you this is very helpful.  The curl request you was successful and returned my profile info.  I then tried the repo list api via curl: 

 

curl -v -H 'Authorization: token XXX' https://api.github.com/orgs/my_employer/repos  

 This is where I get a 403 error and the following JSON: 

 

{
 "message": "Resource protected by organization SAML enforcement. You must grant your personal token access to this organization.",
 "documentation_url": "https://help.github.com/articles/authorizing-a-personal-access-token-for-use-with-a-saml-single-sign-on-organization"
} 

 This was my mistake - we use federated authentication and I hadn't granted access to the org via the SSO button in github.  After granting that authorization, everything worked just fine.  This is obviously a user error, but a more useful error message would be helpful.  I am happy to contribute this bug fix.  Where should I implement the error checking?  Is it githubscm::connect?   Thank you, Alex.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50201) include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50201  
 
 
  include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Labels: 
 team-pre  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50201) include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread jn...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 James Nord updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50201  
 
 
  include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 James Nord  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The jackson-module-jaxb-annotations module is somewhat tied to the lifecycle of jackson and as such should ideally be provided in the plugin.Hence please include it in the plugin.{code:xml}com.fasterxml.jackson.modulejackson-module-jaxb-annotations{code} https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-modules-base / https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-module-jaxb-annotations (older versions)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50202) include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50202  
 
 
  include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Labels: 
 team-pre  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50202) include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50202  
 
 
  include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Labels: 
 team-pre  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50202) include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread jn...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 James Nord updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50202  
 
 
  include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 James Nord  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The jackson- module dataformat - jaxb-annotations yaml  module is somewhat tied to the lifecycle of jackson and as such should ideally be provided in the plugin.Hence please include it in the plugin.{code:xml}com.fasterxml.jackson. module dataformat jackson- module dataformat - jaxb-annotations yaml {code} https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text / https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-yaml (older versions)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50201) include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50201  
 
 
  include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Labels: 
 team-pre  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50202) include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread jn...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 James Nord created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50202  
 
 
  include jackson-dataformat-yaml in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Task  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Components: 
 jackson2-api-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 17:38  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 James Nord  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The jackson-module-jaxb-annotations module is somewhat tied to the lifecycle of jackson and as such should ideally be provided in the plugin. Hence please include it in the plugin. 

 

com.fasterxml.jackson.module
jackson-module-jaxb-annotations
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50201) include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin

2018-03-15 Thread jn...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 James Nord created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50201  
 
 
  include jackson-module-jaxb-annotations in the plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Task  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Components: 
 jackson2-api-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 17:37  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 James Nord  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The jackson-module-jaxb-annotations module is somewhat tied to the lifecycle of jackson and as such should ideally be provided in the plugin. Hence please include it in the plugin. 

 

com.fasterxml.jackson.module
jackson-module-jaxb-annotations
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-49842) Publish jenkins/evergreen docker image

2018-03-15 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy commented on  JENKINS-49842  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Publish jenkins/evergreen docker image   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 And we have our image automatically being published here  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49842) Publish jenkins/evergreen docker image

2018-03-15 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy updated  JENKINS-49842  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49842  
 
 
  Publish jenkins/evergreen docker image   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread mkoz...@magento.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mike Kozell updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50199  
 
 
  Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mike Kozell  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h2. SetupJenkins v2.89.4 LTS Pipeline API Plugin: 2.26 Pipeline Nodes and Processes Plugin: 2.19 Durable Task Plugin: 1.18 Pipeline Job Plugin: 2.17 Pipeline Shared Groovy Libraries Plugin: 2.9 Pipeline Supporting APIs Plugin: 2.18  Pipeline Groovy Plugin: 2.45  Script Security Plugin: 1.41Pipeline Default Speed/Durability Level: Performance-Optimized "Do not allow the pipeline to resume if the master restarts": Enabled on all jobsh2. ProblemI logged into a Jenkins master and saw no builds running but there was a queue of about 10 jobs. When mousing over the queued jobs, I saw "pending - Already running 2 builds across all nodes". This is strange because no jobs were showing as running and no Jenkins agents or executors were showing any running builds.I then ran "http://xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/computer/api/xml?tree=computer[executors[currentExecutable[url]],oneOffExecutors[currentExecutable[url]]]=//url=builds" which did show 5 builds were running. I checked these builds and they were red (failure) and were not running.h2. ResearchI checked the console log of a build that showed as running but isn't and saw the line below near the top of the log._*Resume disabled by user, switching to high-performance, low-durability mode.*_At the end of the of the log I saw the following:*_Finished: FAILURE_* *_Resuming build at Tue Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 after Jenkins restart_*h2. Why Resume Build?The build failed on *Mar 12, 2018 6:02:37 PM*.  +Why did the build try to resume almost a day later+? The job and system durability are configured to not resume builds. Below are some details taken from the API for the build._class "hudson.model.OneOffExecutor" id "41" keepLog false number 41 queueId 7178 result "FAILURE" timestamp 1520877757466I checked the Java process on the server and it was last restarted on *March 02 2018*.+What triggered the "Jenkins restart" identified on Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 since the Java process was not restarted?++Why does this get the build stuck in a "running" state when it's not running?+h2. ScopeThis issue can be seen across many of our Jenkins masters. In each case we see "Resuming build at x after Jenkins restart" occur a few days after the build failure or abort even though Java was not restarted. This issue didn't occur on Jenkins 2.60.3 running the older (pre-durability configurable) Pipeline plugins.h2. LogsI checked the jenkins.log file and saw the following when the build was attempting to be resumed. {code:java}Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution onLoad WARNING: Pipeline state not properly persisted, cannot resume job/JENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42/ Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService reportProblem WARNING: Unexpected exception in CPS VM thread: CpsFlowExecution[OwnerJENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42:JENKINS-JOB-NAME1 #42] java.lang.NullPointerException 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread mkoz...@magento.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mike Kozell updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50199  
 
 
  Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mike Kozell  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h2. SetupJenkins v2.89.4 LTS Pipeline API Plugin: 2.26 Pipeline Nodes and Processes Plugin: 2.19 Durable Task Plugin: 1.18 Pipeline Job Plugin: 2.17 Pipeline Shared Groovy Libraries Plugin: 2.9 Pipeline Supporting APIs Plugin: 2.18 Script Security Plugin: 1.41Pipeline Default Speed/Durability Level: Performance-Optimized "Do not allow the pipeline to resume if the master restarts": Enabled on all jobsh2. ProblemI logged into a Jenkins master and saw no builds running but there was a queue of about 10 jobs. When mousing over the queued jobs, I saw "pending - Already running 2 builds across all nodes". This is strange because no jobs were showing as running and no Jenkins agents or executors were showing any running builds.I then ran "http://xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/computer/api/xml?tree=computer[executors[currentExecutable[url]],oneOffExecutors[currentExecutable[url]]]=//url=builds" which did show 5 builds were running. I checked these builds and they were red (failure) and were not running.h2. ResearchI checked the console log of a build that showed as running but isn't and saw the line below near the top of the log._*Resume disabled by user, switching to high-performance, low-durability mode.*_At the end of the of the log I saw the following:*_Finished: FAILURE_* *_Resuming build at Tue Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 after Jenkins restart_*h2. Why Resume Build?The build failed on *Mar 12, 2018 6:02:37 PM*.  +Why did the build try to resume almost a day later+? The job and system durability are configured to not resume builds. Below are some details taken from the API for the build._class "hudson.model.OneOffExecutor" id "41" keepLog false number 41 queueId 7178 result "FAILURE" timestamp 1520877757466I checked the Java process on the server and it was last restarted on *March 02 2018*.+What triggered the "Jenkins restart" identified on Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 since the Java process was not restarted?++Why does this get the build stuck in a "running" state when it's not running?+h2. ScopeThis issue can be seen across many of our Jenkins masters. In each case we see "Resuming build at x after Jenkins restart" occur a few days after the build failure or abort even though Java was not restarted. This issue didn't occur on Jenkins 2.60.3 running the older (pre-durability configurable) Pipeline plugins.h2. LogsI checked the jenkins.log file and saw the following when the build was attempting to be resumed. {code:java}Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution onLoad WARNING: Pipeline state not properly persisted, cannot resume job/JENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42/   Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService reportProblem WARNING: Unexpected exception in CPS VM thread: CpsFlowExecution[OwnerJENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42:JENKINS-JOB-NAME1 #42] java.lang.NullPointerException at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50198) node config gets overridden when spinning up node via Ec2 plugin

2018-03-15 Thread franc...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francis Upton commented on  JENKINS-50198  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: node config gets overridden when spinning up node via Ec2 plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Are you using labels to associate the AMI with the desired jobs?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread mkoz...@magento.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mike Kozell updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50199  
 
 
  Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mike Kozell  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h2. SetupJenkins v2.89.4 LTS Pipeline API Plugin: 2.26 Pipeline Nodes and Processes Plugin: 2.19 Durable Task Plugin: 1.18 Pipeline Job Plugin: 2.17 Pipeline Shared Groovy Libraries Plugin: 2.9 Pipeline Supporting APIs Plugin: 2.18 Script Security Plugin: 1.41Pipeline Default Speed/Durability Level: Performance-Optimized "Do not allow the pipeline to resume if the master restarts": Enabled on all jobsh2. ProblemI logged into a Jenkins master and saw no builds running but there was a queue of about 10 jobs. When mousing over the queued jobs, I saw "pending - Already running 2 builds across all nodes". This is strange because no jobs were showing as running and no Jenkins agents or executors were showing any running builds.I then ran "http://xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/computer/api/xml?tree=computer[executors[currentExecutable[url]],oneOffExecutors[currentExecutable[url]]]=//url=builds" which did show 5 builds were running. I checked these builds and they were red (failure) and were not running.h2. ResearchI checked the console log of a build that showed as running but isn't and saw the line below near the top of the log._*Resume disabled by user, switching to high-performance, low-durability mode.*_At the end of the of the log I saw the following:*_Finished: FAILURE_* *_Resuming build at Tue Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 after Jenkins restart_*h2. Why Resume Build?The build failed on *Mar 12, 2018 6:02:37 PM*.  +Why did the build try to resume almost a day later+? The job and system durability are configured to not resume builds. Below are some details taken from the API for the build._class "hudson.model.OneOffExecutor" id "41" keepLog false number 41 queueId 7178 result "FAILURE" timestamp 1520877757466I checked the Java process on the server and it was last restarted on *March 02 2018*.+What triggered the "Jenkins restart" identified on Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 since the Java process was not restarted?++Why does this get the build stuck in a "running" state when it's not running?+h2. ScopeThis issue can be seen across many of our Jenkins masters. In each case we see "Resuming build at x after Jenkins restart" occur a few days after the build failure or abort even though Java was not restarted. This issue didn't occur on Jenkins 2.60.3 running the older (pre-durability configurable) Pipeline plugins.h2. LogsI checked the jenkins.log file and saw the following when the build was attempting to be resumed. {code:java}Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution onLoad WARNING: Pipeline state not properly persisted, cannot resume job/JENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42/ Mar 13, 2018 9:29:56 PM org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService reportProblem WARNING: Unexpected exception in CPS VM thread: CpsFlowExecution[OwnerJENKINS-JOB-NAME1/42:JENKINS-JOB-NAME1 #42] java.lang.NullPointerException at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50200) Label accepts 2 groovy variables when using && but not || operator

2018-03-15 Thread atay...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Taylor created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50200  
 
 
  Label accepts 2 groovy variables when using && but not || operator   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 workflow-cps-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 17:20  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Alex Taylor  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 When running a pipeline, the label expects a string with the option of an operator. Apparently the && operator with 2 groovy variables will evaluate correctly but not a || operator. So this pipeline runs correctly:   

 

def groovyLabel1 = 'master'
def groovyLabel2 = 'TestAgent'
node(groovyLabel1 && groovyLabel2){
echo "hello"
}
 

 But this code does not run correctly:   

 

def groovyLabel1 = 'master'
def groovyLabel2 = 'TestAgent'
node(groovyLabel1 || groovyLabel2){
echo "hello"
} 

 because it fails with this error:   

 

java.lang.ClassCastException: org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.support.steps.ExecutorStep.label expects class java.lang.String but received class java.lang.Boolean
 

   I think that groovy is doing some funky parsing here and causing the error because what should be the only thing allowed would be something 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50199) Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume

2018-03-15 Thread mkoz...@magento.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mike Kozell created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50199  
 
 
  Failed pipeline jobs stuck running after incorrect resume   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 pipeline, workflow-api-plugin, workflow-cps-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 17:18  
 
 
Priority: 
  Critical  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Mike Kozell  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Setup Jenkins v2.89.4 LTS Pipeline API Plugin: 2.26 Pipeline Nodes and Processes Plugin: 2.19 Durable Task Plugin: 1.18 Pipeline Job Plugin: 2.17 Pipeline Shared Groovy Libraries Plugin: 2.9 Pipeline Supporting APIs Plugin: 2.18 Script Security Plugin: 1.41 Pipeline Default Speed/Durability Level: Performance-Optimized "Do not allow the pipeline to resume if the master restarts": Enabled on all jobs Problem I logged into a Jenkins master and saw no builds running but there was a queue of about 10 jobs. When mousing over the queued jobs, I saw "pending - Already running 2 builds across all nodes". This is strange because no jobs were showing as running and no Jenkins agents or executors were showing any running builds. I then ran "http://xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/computer/api/xml?tree=computer[executors[currentExecutable[url]],oneOffExecutors[currentExecutable[url]]]=//url=builds" which did show 5 builds were running. I checked these builds and they were red (failure) and were not running. Research I checked the console log of a build that showed as running but isn't and saw the line below near the top of the log. Resume disabled by user, switching to high-performance, low-durability mode. At the end of the of the log I saw the following: Finished: FAILURE Resuming build at Tue Mar 13 23:04:52 UTC 2018 after Jenkins restart Why Resume Build? The build failed on Mar 12, 2018 6:02:37 PM.  Why did the build try to resume almost a day later? The job and system durability are configured to not resume builds. Below are some details taken from the API for the build. _class "hudson.model.OneOffExecutor" id "41" keepLog false number 41 queueId 7178 result "FAILURE" timestamp 1520877757466 I 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50198) node config gets overridden when spinning up node via Ec2 plugin

2018-03-15 Thread daniel.marsh...@argos.co.uk (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Dan Marshall created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50198  
 
 
  node config gets overridden when spinning up node via Ec2 plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Francis Upton  
 
 
Attachments: 
 image-2018-03-15-17-09-26-148.png  
 
 
Components: 
 ec2-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 17:18  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins v2.73.3  ec2 1.38  job-restrictions 0.6  
 
 
Labels: 
 ec2-plugin  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Dan Marshall  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We have ephemeral nodes created by the EC2 plugin when needed by jobs. Since some jobs require elevated AWS permissions, we have created 2 cloud configurations ('general' and 'devops') with the latter having permissions to carry out actions such as create AMI etc. The problem we are trying to solve is that any of the other users can tell their job to use these nodes. The aim is to restrict the jobs that can be run on this node by using the job restrictions plugin to only allow jobs in a particular directory. The issue we are facing is that there doesn't appear to be a way to easily integrate the EC2 and Job Restrictions plugins with each other such that the necessary config is applied to the node as it is spun up. The workaround is currently an init script (on the node) which utilises jenkins-cli.jar to manipulate the node's config on the master. This works perfectly when the node is spun up manually via the configure nodes page (as seen below), but does not when a 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50197) Incorporate "pre-release" builds of plugins into Jenkins Essentials

2018-03-15 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50197  
 
 
  Incorporate "pre-release" builds of plugins into Jenkins Essentials   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Sprint: 
 Essentials - Milestone 1  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50197) Incorporate "pre-release" builds of plugins into Jenkins Essentials

2018-03-15 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50197  
 
 
  Incorporate "pre-release" builds of plugins into Jenkins Essentials   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Task  
 
 
Assignee: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Components: 
 essentials  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-03-15 17:03  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 At some point in the very near future, we'll want to incorporate some "pre-release" builds of various components, plugins, and core. From Carlos Sanchez, the following pull requests would be good first versions to support. https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/3302 https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-api-plugin/pull/67 https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-basic-steps-plugin/pull/60 https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-step-api-plugin/pull/33  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50195) Create a non root user for running Jenkins and the evergreen-client

2018-03-15 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy assigned an issue to Unassigned  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50195  
 
 
  Create a non root user for running Jenkins and the evergreen-client   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Assignee: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49707) Pipeline hangs: "The channel is closing down or has closed down"

2018-03-15 Thread contact.if.urg...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Shital Savekar commented on  JENKINS-49707  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline hangs: "The channel is closing down or has closed down"   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I would like to increase the Priority of this issue to "Major" since this issue is affecting a lot of users.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50178) Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible

2018-03-15 Thread pat...@diabol.se (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Patrik Boström commented on  JENKINS-50178  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 No problem, happy to help!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50178) Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible

2018-03-15 Thread jordan.l...@motoristsgroup.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jordan Look closed an issue as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Did not see "Enable manual builds" button.  Issue resolved after enabling  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50178  
 
 
  Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Jordan Look  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50178) Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible

2018-03-15 Thread jordan.l...@motoristsgroup.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jordan Look commented on  JENKINS-50178  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 That worked. I was working on this issue all day yesterday and did notice that button.  I appreciate your help and apologize for any inconvenience.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50178) Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible

2018-03-15 Thread pat...@diabol.se (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Patrik Boström edited a comment on  JENKINS-50178  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Unable to manually trigger builds because play button is not visible   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Have you enabled Enable  "Enable manual triggers" in the view configuration ? .  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  1   2   3   >