[JIRA] (JENKINS-53867) Too many open files caused Jenkins crashed

2018-10-08 Thread tapio.reijo...@vaisala.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tapio Reijonen edited a comment on  JENKINS-53867  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Too many open files caused Jenkins crashed   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I think, we can't run this "file-leak-detecor",java.lang.Error: Failed to activate file leak detector: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to find tools.jar at /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.131-3.b12.el7_3.x86_64/jre/../lib/tools.jar  ---  —  you need to run this tool with a JDK at org.kohsuke.file_leak_detector.Main.loadAttachApi(Main.java:73) at org.kohsuke.file_leak_detector.Main.run(Main.java:48) at org.kohsuke.file_leak_detector.Main.main(Main.java:36) Is this the only way to find out which component cause the problem)?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53780) jenkins jira plugin failed to instantiate key hudson.plugins.jira.JiraProjectProperty when restart jenkins

2018-10-08 Thread 1542413...@qq.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 yuan kang updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53780  
 
 
  jenkins jira plugin failed to instantiate key hudson.plugins.jira.JiraProjectProperty when restart jenkins   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 yuan kang  
 
 
Labels: 
 jira- plugin -3.0.0  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50715) Pipeline fails with NPE due to Blue Ocean favorites

2018-10-08 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite edited a comment on  JENKINS-50715  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline fails with NPE due to Blue Ocean favorites   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I've seen the same problem with Jenkins 2.138.1, Blue Ocean 1.8.4, and autofavoriting plugin 1.2.2.I built the tip of the plugin development branch and confirmed that the tip of the branch does not fail the builds.   The build is available in [my github repository|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/docker-lfs/blob/02b72ca50f00447fd9824624544f1d8581665dec/ref/plugins/blueocean-autofavorite.jpi] if someone else needs it before the official release. I recommend the tip of the branch be released so that this bug is fixed.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41805) Pipeline Job-- deletedir() delete only current directory but @script and @tmp dir still there in workspace.

2018-10-08 Thread ia...@il.ibm.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Idan Adar commented on  JENKINS-41805  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline Job-- deletedir() delete only current directory but @script and @tmp dir still there in workspace.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 +1 Our agents remain unclean because of this.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-50715) Pipeline fails with NPE due to Blue Ocean favorites

2018-10-08 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite edited a comment on  JENKINS-50715  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline fails with NPE due to Blue Ocean favorites   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I've seen the same problem with Jenkins 2.138.1, Blue Ocean 1.8.4, and autofavoriting plugin 1.2.2 .I built the tip of the plugin development branch and confirmed that the tip of the branch does not fail the builds.I recommend the tip of the branch be released so that this bug is fixed.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53945) Adding a new configuration to the azure-vm-agents-plugin to enable MSI

2018-10-08 Thread jie...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jie Shen assigned an issue to Jie Shen  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53945  
 
 
  Adding a new configuration to the azure-vm-agents-plugin to enable MSI   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Jie Shen  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Azure DevOps Jie Shen  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49316) Create Item: OK button disabled until TAB pressed

2018-10-08 Thread sanched...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Sanchez commented on  JENKINS-49316  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Create Item: OK button disabled until TAB pressed   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Just followed the steps you mentioned and the issue seems to be there. As well as if you delete your selection and don't select anything else, the OK button doesn't get disabled. I would like to work on this issue. I will be assigning it to myself.    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49316) Create Item: OK button disabled until TAB pressed

2018-10-08 Thread sanched...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Sanchez assigned an issue to Daniel Sanchez  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49316  
 
 
  Create Item: OK button disabled until TAB pressed   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Sanchez  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Daniel Sanchez  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-43758) Parameters disappear from pipeline job after running the job

2018-10-08 Thread nfollet...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Nick Follett edited a comment on  JENKINS-43758  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Parameters disappear from pipeline job after running the job   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I am having this problem with declarative pipelines.  {code:java}pipeline {  agent any  options {ansiColor('xterm')// Prevent multiple pipelines from running concurrently and failing due to tfstate lock filedisableConcurrentBuilds()  }  triggers {gitlab(  branchFilterType: 'All',  triggerOnPush: false,  triggerOnMergeRequest: true,  triggerOpenMergeRequestOnPush: "never",  triggerOnNoteRequest: true,  noteRegex: "jenkins rebuild",  skipWorkInProgressMergeRequest: true,)  }  ...}{code}  All of my pipelines are auto-imported from a separate job using the Job DSL plugin. I need to manually run each job once in order for the config.xml to be populated with the settings from the Jenkinsfile.  When I check the configuration in the UI after this initial run I see that the pipeline is configured with the settings shown above.  After I trigger the pipeline with a test merge request in GitLab the pipeline will succeed, but the trigger settings will disappear in the UI.   If I trigger the job again manually the trigger settings for GitLab webhooks will re-appear.[Jenkins ver. 2.107.3|https://jenkins.io/]  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-43758) Parameters disappear from pipeline job after running the job

2018-10-08 Thread nfollet...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Nick Follett commented on  JENKINS-43758  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Parameters disappear from pipeline job after running the job   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I am having this problem with declarative pipelines. 

 

pipeline {
  agent any
  options {
ansiColor('xterm')
// Prevent multiple pipelines from running concurrently and failing due to tfstate lock file
disableConcurrentBuilds()
  }
  triggers {
gitlab(
  branchFilterType: 'All',
  triggerOnPush: false,
  triggerOnMergeRequest: true,
  triggerOpenMergeRequestOnPush: "never",
  triggerOnNoteRequest: true,
  noteRegex: "jenkins rebuild",
  skipWorkInProgressMergeRequest: true,
)
  }
  ...
} 

 All of my pipelines are auto-imported from a separate job using the Job DSL plugin. I need to manually run each job once in order for the config.xml to be populated with the settings from the Jenkinsfile.  When I check the configuration in the UI after this initial run I see that the pipeline is configured with the settings shown above.  After I trigger the pipeline with a test merge request in GitLab the pipeline will succeed, but the trigger settings will disappear in the UI.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53952) Linux slaves are not starting anymore

2018-10-08 Thread gun...@grodotzki.co.za (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Gunter Grodotzki created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53952  
 
 
  Linux slaves are not starting anymore   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 FABRIZIO MANFREDI  
 
 
Components: 
 ec2-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 23:23  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins ver. 2.138.1  
 
 
Priority: 
  Blocker  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Gunter Grodotzki  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Similar to https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-53876 Unfortunately with the latest 1.40.1 EC2 nodes are not launching anymore: 

 
$ cat Jenkins\ Prebuilt\ Slave\ \(sir-p9ai6v8m\)/slave.log
Oct 08, 2018 10:43:49 PM hudson.plugins.ec2.EC2Cloud
INFO: Launching instance: null
Oct 08, 2018 10:43:49 PM hudson.plugins.ec2.EC2Cloud
INFO: bootstrap()
Oct 08, 2018 10:43:49 PM hudson.plugins.ec2.EC2Cloud
INFO: Getting keypair...
Oct 08, 2018 10:43:49 PM hudson.plugins.ec2.EC2Cloud
INFO: Using key: master
xxx
-BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
xxx
Oct 08, 2018 10:43:49 PM hudson.plugins.ec2.EC2Cloud
INFO: Authenticating as ubuntu
ERROR: Unexpected error in launching an agent. This is probably a bug in Jenkins
java.lang.NullPointerException
	at hudson.plugins.ec2.ssh.EC2UnixLauncher.getEC2HostAddress(EC2UnixLauncher.java:368)
	at hudson.plugins.ec2.ssh.EC2UnixLauncher.connectToSsh(EC2UnixLauncher.java:318)
	at hudson.plugins.ec2.ssh.EC2UnixLauncher.bootstrap(EC2UnixLauncher.java:282)
	at hudson.plugins.ec2.ssh.EC2UnixLauncher.launchScript(EC2UnixLauncher.java:130)
	at hudson.plugins.ec2.EC2ComputerLauncher.launch(EC2ComputerLauncher.java:48)
	at hudson.slaves.SlaveComputer$1.call(SlaveComputer.java:294)
	at jenkins.util.ContextResettingExecutorService$2.call(ContextResettingExecutorService.java:46)
	at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread simondemart...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Simon DeMartini commented on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I've started experiencing this issue as well after a recent upgrade to 1.40. It looks like the plugin stops the nodes all right, but when it goes to restart them, it tries to connect but constantly times out and it looks like the EC2 instance it should have started is still stopped    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53951) withMaven fail to set maven path when global variable is set

2018-10-08 Thread bernardosilveirav...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Bernardo Vale updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53951  
 
 
  withMaven fail to set maven path when global variable is set   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Bernardo Vale  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 If there's a global variable defining a path to maven /bin . Pipeline integration fails to setup the  request  requested  maven tool. **Steps to Reproduce**1.  Install two maven versions, say 3.5.3 and 3.5.4 2. Define a global variable  MAVEN+ PATH +MAVEN =/path/to/maven/3.5.3 /bin  3. Create a pipeline that uses withMaven step selecting maven 3.5.4Run sh "mvn --version"We expect it to show selected version 3.5.4 but it will show 3.5.3    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53951) withMaven fail to set maven path when global variable is set

2018-10-08 Thread bernardosilveirav...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Bernardo Vale created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53951  
 
 
  withMaven fail to set maven path when global variable is set   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Alvaro Lobato  
 
 
Components: 
 pipeline-maven-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 21:14  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins ver. 2.107.3   
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Bernardo Vale  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 If there's a global variable defining a path to maven. Pipeline integration fails to setup the request maven tool.   *Steps to Reproduce* 1.  Install two maven versions, say 3.5.3 and 3.5.4   2. Define a global variable MAVEN+PATH=/path/to/maven/3.5.3   3. Create a pipeline that uses withMaven step selecting maven 3.5.4 Run sh "mvn --version" We expect it to show selected version 3.5.4 but it will show 3.5.3      
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53750) Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows

2018-10-08 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53750  
 
 
  Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Component/s: 
 workflow-durable-task-step-plugin  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53750) Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows

2018-10-08 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum edited a comment on  JENKINS-53750  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 While it would be nice to improve the behavior here, it seems like there are some straightforward workarounds if I understand correctly: * Move the directory manipulation into your sh/bat script, and combine your scripts into one (it's generally better to combine your scripts anyways) * Add a manual {{sleep}} between sh/bat steps in cases where both scripts both modify the same directory in the workspace.We do not explicitly test using  `  {{ sh ` }}   on Windows, so although you may be able to get it working with Cygwin, MSys, etc., and we will do our best to fix any regressions we introduce, it is not recommended, and something like this that has never worked (as far as I can tell) does not seem like something we would prioritize for a fix.That said, the code is open source, and if you want to work on fixing it, I am happy to help review your changes. I would start with creating a reproduction test in [workflow-durable-task-step|https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-durable-task-step-plugin] step along the lines of the following to demonstrate the issue:  {code :java }@Issue("JENKINS-53750")@Test public void cleanupBeforeStepCompletes() throws Exception {Assume.assumeTrue("Test is Windows-specific", Functions.isWindows());WorkflowJob p = j.jenkins.createProject(WorkflowJob.class, "p");p.setDefinition(new CpsFlowDefinition("node {\n" +"  dir('foo/bar') {\n" +"sh 'sleep 1'\n" +"  }\n" +"  bat 'rename foo baz'\n" +"}", true));j.assertBuildStatusSuccess(p.scheduleBuild2(0));}{code}  Once you have that test failing in the way you intend, you could make changes to BourneShellScript/FileMonitoringTask in durable-task to see how they affect the test. I don't have an environment to be able to reproduce the issue myself, but maybe something like switching [these two lines|https://github.com/jenkinsci/durable-task-plugin/blob/2016c3f3e3f10a8bd51a7b2d073ef7eb91d85f10/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/durabletask/FileMonitoringTask.java#L488-L489] so the workspace is cleaned up before the script exits would help?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53750) Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows

2018-10-08 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53750  
 
 
  Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Labels: 
 pipeline sh windows  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53750) Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows

2018-10-08 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum commented on  JENKINS-53750  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Shell scripts keep the working directory locked on Windows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 While it would be nice to improve the behavior here, it seems like there are some straightforward workarounds if I understand correctly: 
 
Move the directory manipulation into your sh/bat script, and combine your scripts into one (it's generally better to combine your scripts anyways) 
Add a manual sleep between sh/bat steps in cases where both scripts both modify the same directory in the workspace. 
 We do not explicitly test using `sh` on Windows, so although you may be able to get it working with Cygwin, MSys, etc., and we will do our best to fix any regressions we introduce, it is not recommended, and something like this that has never worked (as far as I can tell) does not seem like something we would prioritize for a fix. That said, the code is open source, and if you want to work on fixing it, I am happy to help review your changes. I would start with creating a reproduction test in workflow-durable-task-step step along the lines of the following to demonstrate the issue: 

 

@Issue("JENKINS-53750")
@Test public void cleanupBeforeStepCompletes() throws Exception {
Assume.assumeTrue("Test is Windows-specific", Functions.isWindows());
WorkflowJob p = j.jenkins.createProject(WorkflowJob.class, "p");
p.setDefinition(new CpsFlowDefinition("node {\n" +
"  dir('foo/bar') {\n" +
"sh 'sleep 1'\n" +
"  }\n" +
"  bat 'rename foo baz'\n" +
"}", true));
j.assertBuildStatusSuccess(p.scheduleBuild2(0));
}
 

 Once you have that test failing in the way you intend, you could make changes to BourneShellScript/FileMonitoringTask in durable-task to see how they affect the test. I don't have an environment to be able to reproduce the issue myself, but maybe something like switching these two lines so the workspace is cleaned up before the script exits would help?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 

get the thread dump from the hung tests which are running a separate process launched by gradle
 If that is all you wanted, you may be barking up the wrong tree. The JUnit Timeout rule, for example, applies a per-test-case timeout (which is likely to be more robust and easier to manage that a per-build timeout) and automatically displays a thread dump for hung tests.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Thanks, I did see that, but a "kill -3" on the main gradle process isn't going to help me - I need to get the thread dump from the hung tests which are running a separate process launched by gradle.  My current approach is to run "jstack" on every java process on the slave (we have a single executor policy) I also just tried setting JENKINS_SERVER_COOKIE on the child process and that doesn't help with killing subprocesses, but I haven't had time to research further.  /usr/bin/timeout does work in combination with my trap script.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-52826) Clicking Configure on a worker created by GCE Plugin results in an error

2018-10-08 Thread rachel...@google.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Rachel Yen closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Added a view only form.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-52826  
 
 
  Clicking Configure on a worker created by GCE Plugin results in an error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Rachel Yen  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/google-compute-engine-plugin/releases/tag/google-compute-engine-1.0.5  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53950) Support configuration as code

2018-10-08 Thread naineels...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Naineel Shah created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53950  
 
 
  Support configuration as code   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Improvement  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 influxdb-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 19:53  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Naineel Shah  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Enable support for configuration as code (https://github.com/jenkinsci/configuration-as-code-plugin)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 And no you do not need a separate pipeline-timeout-prekill.sh if you are using /usr/bin/timeout. Look at my example again. That one-liner sends SIGQUIT after ten seconds, then waits one more second for the thread dump to appear, and sends a SIGTERM.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 As I said before, yes Jenkins might be sending SIGTERM to the whole process tree, not only the entry script. This might be worked around (untested) via 

 

JENKINS_SERVER_COOKIE=suppress java -jar …
 

 since it uses this environment variable to identify some processes. I have forgotten the details at this point. (JENKINS-28182) The “good solutions” are 
 
Java shutdown hooks 
using /usr/bin/timeout 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Interestingly, when I use the linux "timeout" that you mention instead of the timeout step, traps work fine... So the linux solution is a combination of the shell script and timeout: 

 

timeout 10 bash pipeline-timeout-prekill.sh './gradlew ' 

 Which is a lot of parts...  but OK - now I'll just need to find an equivalent for windows (we do cross-platform testing on many platforms, that's why I wanted to solve this in pipeline code).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-47643) Allow [ci skip] to work for non-pull request changes

2018-10-08 Thread witokondo...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Javier Delgado commented on  JENKINS-47643  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Allow [ci skip] to work for non-pull request changes   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Kevin Burnett, marbon and David Sanftenberg, could you test the opened pull request artifacts? Both hpi files found at https://ci.jenkins.io/blue/organizations/jenkins/Plugins%2Fscm-trait-commit-skip-plugin/detail/feature%2FskippingBranches/1/artifacts (github and bitbucket) implement filtering branches on both [skip-ci] and [ci-skip] committed messages  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jesse Glick at your suggestion I switched from using pipeline tricks to the bash script (which I tested only locally): https://github.com/akomakom/jenkins-scripts/blob/master/pipeline-timeout-prekill/pipeline-timeout-prekill.sh It does not work in Jenkins.  It works fine in local testing (pkill --signal SIGTERM  or Ctrl-C) but not in a Jenkins timeout step - the trap never runs, termination is instant. This leads me to believe that Jenkins actually sends a SIGTERM to the whole process tree right away. In other words, there is still no good solution aside for pipeline tricks.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53949) Unable to see jobs in my new Jenkins ver. 2.138.1

2018-10-08 Thread suresh.balasubraman...@infor.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Suresh Garg created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53949  
 
 
  Unable to see jobs in my new Jenkins ver. 2.138.1   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 maven-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 19:25  
 
 
Environment: 
 Windows  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Suresh Garg  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I installed Jenkins version 2.138.1. I copied over the jobs folder from another server. I started Jenkins and I am unable to see the jobs in the dashboard. This is the error I am seeing:   I have made sure that, I can, 
 
Access the config.xml in each of the job folders 
The plugins are all installed. 
       Failed Loading item sce-installer-util.trunk com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException: maven2-moduleset at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DefaultMapper.realClass(DefaultMapper.java:79) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:30) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DynamicProxyMapper.realClass(DynamicProxyMapper.java:55) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:30) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.PackageAliasingMapper.realClass(PackageAliasingMapper.java:88) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:30) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.ClassAliasingMapper.realClass(ClassAliasingMapper.java:79) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:30) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:30) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:30) 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53947) Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error

2018-10-08 Thread bat...@batmat.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Baptiste Mathus commented on  JENKINS-53947  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Confirmed to be fixed by running from the fresh latest built public image. Thanks Tyler !  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53424) script-security plugin breaks parameterized pipeline builds

2018-10-08 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum updated  JENKINS-53424  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53424  
 
 
  script-security plugin breaks parameterized pipeline builds   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Devin Nusbaum  
 
 
Status: 
 Fixed but Unreleased Resolved  
 
 
Released As: 
 script-security 1.46  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Bourne shell scripts will indeed not be available in most Windows flavors, but I assume an analogous feature is easy to write in Powershell. Or, again, depending on the Java program in question, you can intercept SIGTERM in a cross-platform manner using Java APIs. In fact, at least on Linux, you can dispense with the timeout step altogether! 

 

sh 'timeout 11 timeout -sQUIT 10 java -jar …/jdk5/demo/jfc/SwingSet2/SwingSet2.jar'
 

 As to why you should always prefer native solutions to Pipeline script tricks, this is a subject for innumerable conference talks. Just trust me that you are better off keeping the Pipeline script to the bare minimum necessary to orchestrate actions on the Jenkins service, boiling your actual build down to a sh './run' if at all possible.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53948) HTTP Proxy Configuration

2018-10-08 Thread salam9...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mohammed Salam created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53948  
 
 
  HTTP Proxy Configuration   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Mohammed Salam  
 
 
Components: 
 ldap-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 17:39  
 
 
Environment: 
 windows 10  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Mohammed Salam  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Error 400  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53947) Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error

2018-10-08 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy updated  JENKINS-53947  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53947  
 
 
  Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-38609) Shared libraries root to be specified in the PATH field

2018-10-08 Thread danagoye...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Dana Goyette commented on  JENKINS-38609  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Shared libraries root to be specified in the PATH field   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Another reason the /vars location is bad: it breaks IDE classpaths.  I can't just set / as the source root if I also want stuff under /src to be counted as the classpath, so it's forced me to add a symlink: src/vars -> ../vars.  I'd much rather have the pipeline stuff follow standard maven project conventions (such as src/main/). With the bug marked "won't do", I can't even select "vote for this issue".  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Why, specifically?  Is the DSL behavior expected to change? They all have downsides over the built-in that this ticket originally requests: 
 
bash script won't work in Windows.   
groovy script fixes that, but both make quoting for a complex sub-process invocation very hard to understand (eg 'bash -c "sleep 5"') because they have to accept the commands as parameters. 
pipeline tricks don't have either limitation, but they do add unnecessary verbosity to the output. 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53944) Findbugs pulls in a very old Xerces library version

2018-10-08 Thread atay...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Taylor commented on  JENKINS-53944  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Findbugs pulls in a very old Xerces library version   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/findbugs-plugin/pull/16 to update  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53906) Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick updated  JENKINS-53906  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53906  
 
 
  Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Jesse Glick  
 
 
Status: 
 Fixed but Unreleased Reopened  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53906) Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick resolved as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Not sure what exactly happened here.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53906  
 
 
  Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Jesse Glick  
 
 
Status: 
 Reopened Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov edited a comment on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I'll try to make the link in my previous comment more visible.  I have 4 solutions now, with this one being the one I'm using:[https://github.com/akomakom/jenkins-scripts/blob/master/pipeline-timeout-prekill/pipeline-timeout-prekill-pure-dsl-failfast.groovy] The only thing I would wish to change would be to silence or reduce the   *waitUntil* output...   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 To be clear, I strongly recommend solving this at the native process level rather than with Pipeline tricks.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov edited a comment on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h3. Summary of findings:I was able to work around this using [a few different methods|https://github.com/akomakom/jenkins-scripts/tree/master/pipeline-timeout-prekill]:  <-- Link  * A *shell script* that traps and cleans up before kill (not cross-platform) * A *groovy script* that traps and cleans up before kill  * A pure pipeline *DSL script* that uses parallel closure to do the same without an external script (at the cost of uglier output)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I'll try to make the link in my previous comment more visible.  I have 4 solutions now, with this one being the one I'm using: https://github.com/akomakom/jenkins-scripts/blob/master/pipeline-timeout-prekill/pipeline-timeout-prekill-pure-dsl-failfast.groovy    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53906) Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144

2018-10-08 Thread frank.shim...@est.fujitsu.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Frank Shimizu edited a comment on  JENKINS-53906  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Fixed by downgrading to a  non-corrupt  gradle plugin version  with matching checksums .  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53947) Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error

2018-10-08 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy updated  JENKINS-53947  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53947  
 
 
  Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Status: 
 In  Progress  Review  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 So if I follow correctly, Jenkins was behaving correctly to the extent that its behavior followed what Ctrl-C in a shell would do (send SIGTERM to subprocesses), and you were able to write a Bourne shell script with a little difficulty that intercepted this signal as sent to the subprocess and did something else before running a clean shutdown? If so, would you mind posting your script (or, better, filing it on stackoverflow.com)? I should have mentioned earlier that Java itself has a friendlier solution to this problem: shutdown hooks. A hook could do whatever you liked, including getting all stack traces or dumping threads including more sophisticated information such as locks. With such a hook inserted into your program (if you indeed control it, or can write in-process plugins for it), there is no need for any special wrapper script.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53858) Deadlock on EC2 resources

2018-10-08 Thread ma...@sproutsocial.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mason Donahue commented on  JENKINS-53858  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Deadlock on EC2 resources   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We are currently using one cloud, but multiple configurations within that (same AMI, but machine types and labels differ).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53947) Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error

2018-10-08 Thread ty...@monkeypox.org (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 R. Tyler Croy started work on  JENKINS-53947  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-28877) Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json

2018-10-08 Thread francisco.rodrig...@tomtom.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francisco A. R. Vivas edited a comment on  JENKINS-28877  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~kcuser], I have the same problem with "Approved" pull request event option.As far as I can see here is where Jenkins Bitbucket Plugin fails:[https://github.com/jenkinsci/bitbucket-plugin/blob/ce068b7f2cbf5250aa6d54c3acdd455d45b56246/src/main/java/com/cloudbees/jenkins/plugins/BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java#L24]I have captured the request and repeated here as a curl:{code}curl -X POST \  http://URL/bitbucket-hook/ \  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \  -H 'Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8' \  -H 'Postman-Token: 3d72a314-48e1-45ff-832a-950d43a7435d' \  -H 'X-Event-Key: pr:reviewer:approved' \  -H 'X-Request-Id: 0d6f5c89-f29b-4c8a-9fc4-a6fd1846bafb' \  -d '{"eventKey":"pr:reviewer:approved","date":"2018-10-08T14:29:51+0200","actor":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"pullRequest":{"id":2,"version":5,"title":"test edited online with Bitbucket","description":"abaöldflj","state":"OPEN","open":true,"closed":false,"createdDate":1538055333000,"updatedDate":153809000,"fromRef":{"id":"refs/heads/feature/checkitagain","displayId":"feature/checkitagain","latestCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":" Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT ","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"toRef":{"id":"refs/heads/master","displayId":"master","latestCommit":"ad359c8a9ba1eaf0bd2adec3aa37492c63966afb","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":" Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT ","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"locked":false,"author":{"user":{"name":"otherUserReplaced","emailAddress":"otherUserReplaced","id":11708,"displayName":"otherUserReplaced","active":true,"slug":"otherUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"role":"AUTHOR","approved":false,"status":"UNAPPROVED"},"reviewers":[{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"}],"participants":[]},"participant":{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"},"previousStatus":"UNAPPROVED"}'{code}And has the same response that Bitbucket receive:{code:java}net.sf.json.JSONException: JSONObject["user"] not found. at net.sf.json.JSONObject.getString(JSONObject.java:2040) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPostServicePayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:128) at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53946) Bitbucket plugin unable to parse a Pull Request JSON Object

2018-10-08 Thread francisco.rodrig...@tomtom.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francisco A. R. Vivas updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53946  
 
 
  Bitbucket plugin unable to parse a Pull Request JSON Object   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Francisco A. R. Vivas  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have created this issue after reading JENKINS-28877 and JENKINS-29096. Please, pay attention to the JSON provided as body for the CURL request to test its way of works. I have configured a Webhook in Bitbucket Server 13.1 to be triggered by Approved event. I have received a HTTP 500 error, and get the same response with the next CURL code. Here is the error from Bitbucket UI:{code:java}net.sf.json.JSONException: JSONObject["user"] not found. at net.sf.json.JSONObject.getString(JSONObject.java:2040) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPostServicePayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:128) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:37) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketHookReceiver.doIndex(BitbucketHookReceiver.java:54) at java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.invokeWithArguments(MethodHandle.java:627) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function$MethodFunction.invoke(Function.java:343) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function.bindAndInvoke(Function.java:184) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function.bindAndInvokeAndServeResponse(Function.java:117) at org.kohsuke.stapler.IndexDispatcher.dispatch(IndexDispatcher.java:26) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:734) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:864) at org.kohsuke.stapler.MetaClass$10.dispatch(MetaClass.java:374) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:734) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:864) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:668) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.service(Stapler.java:238) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:860) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1650) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:154) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.ssegateway.Endpoint$SSEListenChannelFilter.doFilter(Endpoint.java:243) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at io.jenkins.blueocean.auth.jwt.impl.JwtAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(JwtAuthenticationFilter.java:61) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at com.smartcodeltd.jenkinsci.plugin.assetbundler.filters.LessCSS.doFilter(LessCSS.java:47) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at io.jenkins.blueocean.ResourceCacheControl.doFilter(ResourceCacheControl.java:134) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at net.bull.javamelody.MonitoringFilter.doFilter(MonitoringFilter.java:239) at net.bull.javamelody.MonitoringFilter.doFilter(MonitoringFilter.java:215) at net.bull.javamelody.PluginMonitoringFilter.doFilter(PluginMonitoringFilter.java:88) at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53947) Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error

2018-10-08 Thread bat...@batmat.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Baptiste Mathus updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53947  
 
 
  Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Baptiste Mathus  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h3. Problem statementFollowing the official documentation, and running{noformat}docker volume create jenkins-evergreen-data && \docker pull jenkins/evergreen:docker-cloud && \docker run --name evergreen \--restart=always \-ti \-p 8080:80 \-v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \-v jenkins-evergreen-data:/evergreen/data \-e LOG_LEVEL=debug \jenkins/evergreen:docker-cloud{noformat}The client fails with to start with the following error : {noformat}> evergreen-client@1.0.0 prestart /evergreen/client> tscsh: tsc: not foundnpm ERR! file shnpm ERR! code ELIFECYCLEnpm ERR! errno ENOENTnpm ERR! syscall spawnnpm ERR! evergreen-client@1.0.0 prestart: `tsc`npm ERR! spawn ENOENTnpm ERR! npm ERR! Failed at the evergreen-client@1.0.0 prestart script.npm ERR! This is probably not a problem with npm. There is likely additional logging output above.{noformat}h3. Expected behaviorThe Evergreen instance should be able to come with a ready to use Jenkins.It seems like there recent js->typescript migration is responsible for this. But then we want to understand why our CI did let that go green :-\.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53946) Bitbucket plugin unable to parse a Pull Request JSON Object

2018-10-08 Thread francisco.rodrig...@tomtom.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francisco A. R. Vivas updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53946  
 
 
  Bitbucket plugin unable to parse a Pull Request JSON Object   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Francisco A. R. Vivas  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have created this issue after reading JENKINS-28877 and JENKINS-29096. Please, pay attention to the JSON provided as body for the CURL request to test its way of works. I have configured a Webhook in Bitbucket Server 13.1 to be triggered by Approved event. I have received a HTTP 500 error, and get the same response with the next CURL code. Here is the error from Bitbucket UI:{code:java}net.sf.json.JSONException: JSONObject["user"] not found. at net.sf.json.JSONObject.getString(JSONObject.java:2040) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPostServicePayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:128) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:37) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketHookReceiver.doIndex(BitbucketHookReceiver.java:54) at java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.invokeWithArguments(MethodHandle.java:627) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function$MethodFunction.invoke(Function.java:343) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function.bindAndInvoke(Function.java:184) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function.bindAndInvokeAndServeResponse(Function.java:117) at org.kohsuke.stapler.IndexDispatcher.dispatch(IndexDispatcher.java:26) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:734) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:864) at org.kohsuke.stapler.MetaClass$10.dispatch(MetaClass.java:374) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:734) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:864) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:668) at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.service(Stapler.java:238) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:860) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1650) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:154) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.ssegateway.Endpoint$SSEListenChannelFilter.doFilter(Endpoint.java:243) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at io.jenkins.blueocean.auth.jwt.impl.JwtAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(JwtAuthenticationFilter.java:61) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at com.smartcodeltd.jenkinsci.plugin.assetbundler.filters.LessCSS.doFilter(LessCSS.java:47) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at io.jenkins.blueocean.ResourceCacheControl.doFilter(ResourceCacheControl.java:134) at hudson.util.PluginServletFilter$1.doFilter(PluginServletFilter.java:151) at net.bull.javamelody.MonitoringFilter.doFilter(MonitoringFilter.java:239) at net.bull.javamelody.MonitoringFilter.doFilter(MonitoringFilter.java:215) at net.bull.javamelody.PluginMonitoringFilter.doFilter(PluginMonitoringFilter.java:88) at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53947) Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error

2018-10-08 Thread bat...@batmat.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Baptiste Mathus updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53947  
 
 
  Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Baptiste Mathus  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h3. Problem statementFollowing the official documentation, and running{noformat}docker volume create jenkins-evergreen-data && \docker pull jenkins/evergreen:docker-cloud && \docker run --name evergreen \--restart=always \-ti \-p 8080:80 \-v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \-v jenkins-evergreen-data:/evergreen/data \-e LOG_LEVEL=debug \jenkins/evergreen:docker-cloud{noformat}The client fails with to start with the following error :  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-28877) Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json

2018-10-08 Thread francisco.rodrig...@tomtom.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francisco A. R. Vivas edited a comment on  JENKINS-28877  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~kcuser], I have the same problem with "Approved" pull request event option.As far as I can see here is where Jenkins Bitbucket Plugin fails:[https://github.com/jenkinsci/bitbucket-plugin/blob/ce068b7f2cbf5250aa6d54c3acdd455d45b56246/src/main/java/com/cloudbees/jenkins/plugins/BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java#L24]I have captured the request and repeated here as a curl:{code}curl -X POST \  http:// ttbsbld102.dev.ttw:8080 URL /bitbucket-hook/ \  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \  -H 'Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8' \  -H 'Postman-Token: 3d72a314-48e1-45ff-832a-950d43a7435d' \  -H 'X-Event-Key: pr:reviewer:approved' \  -H 'X-Request-Id: 0d6f5c89-f29b-4c8a-9fc4-a6fd1846bafb' \  -d '{"eventKey":"pr:reviewer:approved","date":"2018-10-08T14:29:51+0200","actor":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"pullRequest":{"id":2,"version":5,"title":"test edited online with Bitbucket","description":"abaöldflj","state":"OPEN","open":true,"closed":false,"createdDate":1538055333000,"updatedDate":153809000,"fromRef":{"id":"refs/heads/feature/checkitagain","displayId":"feature/checkitagain","latestCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":"Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"toRef":{"id":"refs/heads/master","displayId":"master","latestCommit":"ad359c8a9ba1eaf0bd2adec3aa37492c63966afb","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":"Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"locked":false,"author":{"user":{"name":"otherUserReplaced","emailAddress":"otherUserReplaced","id":11708,"displayName":"otherUserReplaced","active":true,"slug":"otherUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"role":"AUTHOR","approved":false,"status":"UNAPPROVED"},"reviewers":[{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"}],"participants":[]},"participant":{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"},"previousStatus":"UNAPPROVED"}'{code}And has the same response that Bitbucket receive:{code:java}net.sf.json.JSONException: JSONObject["user"] not found. at net.sf.json.JSONObject.getString(JSONObject.java:2040) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPostServicePayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:128) at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-28877) Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json

2018-10-08 Thread francisco.rodrig...@tomtom.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francisco A. R. Vivas edited a comment on  JENKINS-28877  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~kcuser], I have the same problem with "Approved" pull request event option.As far as I can see here is where Jenkins Bitbucket Plugin fails:[https://github.com/jenkinsci/bitbucket-plugin/blob/ce068b7f2cbf5250aa6d54c3acdd455d45b56246/src/main/java/com/cloudbees/jenkins/plugins/BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java#L24]I have captured the request and repeated here as a curl:{code}curl -X POST \  http://ttbsbld102.dev.ttw:8080/bitbucket-hook/ \  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \  -H 'Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8' \  -H 'Postman-Token: 3d72a314-48e1-45ff-832a-950d43a7435d' \  -H 'X-Event-Key: pr:reviewer:approved' \  -H 'X-Request-Id: 0d6f5c89-f29b-4c8a-9fc4-a6fd1846bafb' \  -d '{"eventKey":"pr:reviewer:approved","date":"2018-10-08T14:29:51+0200","actor":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"pullRequest":{"id":2,"version":5,"title":"test edited online with Bitbucket","description":"abaöldflj","state":"OPEN","open":true,"closed":false,"createdDate":1538055333000,"updatedDate":153809000,"fromRef":{"id":"refs/heads/feature/checkitagain","displayId":"feature/checkitagain","latestCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":"Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"toRef":{"id":"refs/heads/master","displayId":"master","latestCommit":"ad359c8a9ba1eaf0bd2adec3aa37492c63966afb","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":"Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"locked":false,"author":{"user":{"name":"otherUserReplaced","emailAddress":"otherUserReplaced","id":11708,"displayName":"otherUserReplaced","active":true,"slug":"otherUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"role":"AUTHOR","approved":false,"status":"UNAPPROVED"},"reviewers":[{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"}],"participants":[]},"participant":{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"},"previousStatus":"UNAPPROVED"}'{code}And has the same response that Bitbucket receive:{code:java}net.sf.json.JSONException: JSONObject["user"] not found. at net.sf.json.JSONObject.getString(JSONObject.java:2040) at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPostServicePayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:128) at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53947) Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error

2018-10-08 Thread bat...@batmat.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Baptiste Mathus created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53947  
 
 
  Evergreen instance fails to start with "sh: tsc: not found" error   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 R. Tyler Croy  
 
 
Components: 
 evergreen  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 15:25  
 
 
Priority: 
  Blocker  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Baptiste Mathus  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53946) Bitbucket plugin unable to parse a Pull Request JSON Object

2018-10-08 Thread francisco.rodrig...@tomtom.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francisco A. R. Vivas created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53946  
 
 
  Bitbucket plugin unable to parse a Pull Request JSON Object   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 bitbucket-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 15:24  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Francisco A. R. Vivas  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have created this issue after reading JENKINS-28877 and JENKINS-29096. Please, pay attention to the JSON provided as body for the CURL request to test its way of works.  I have configured a Webhook in Bitbucket Server 13.1 to be triggered by Approved event. I have received a HTTP 500 error, and get the same response with the next CURL code. Here is the error from Bitbucket UI: 

 

net.sf.json.JSONException: JSONObject["user"] not found.
	at net.sf.json.JSONObject.getString(JSONObject.java:2040)
	at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPostServicePayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:128)
	at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketPayloadProcessor.processPayload(BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java:37)
	at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.BitbucketHookReceiver.doIndex(BitbucketHookReceiver.java:54)
	at java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.invokeWithArguments(MethodHandle.java:627)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function$MethodFunction.invoke(Function.java:343)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function.bindAndInvoke(Function.java:184)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.Function.bindAndInvokeAndServeResponse(Function.java:117)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.IndexDispatcher.dispatch(IndexDispatcher.java:26)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:734)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:864)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.MetaClass$10.dispatch(MetaClass.java:374)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.tryInvoke(Stapler.java:734)
	at org.kohsuke.stapler.Stapler.invoke(Stapler.java:864)
	at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-28877) Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json

2018-10-08 Thread francisco.rodrig...@tomtom.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Francisco A. R. Vivas commented on  JENKINS-28877  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Bitbucket Plugin unable to parse Bitbucket webhook response json   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 K C, I have the same problem with "Approved" pull request event option. As far as I can see here is where Jenkins Bitbucket Plugin fails: https://github.com/jenkinsci/bitbucket-plugin/blob/ce068b7f2cbf5250aa6d54c3acdd455d45b56246/src/main/java/com/cloudbees/jenkins/plugins/BitbucketPayloadProcessor.java#L24 I have captured the request and repeated here as a curl: 

 

curl -X POST \
  http://ttbsbld102.dev.ttw:8080/bitbucket-hook/ \
  -H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8' \
  -H 'Postman-Token: 3d72a314-48e1-45ff-832a-950d43a7435d' \
  -H 'X-Event-Key: pr:reviewer:approved' \
  -H 'X-Request-Id: 0d6f5c89-f29b-4c8a-9fc4-a6fd1846bafb' \
  -d '{"eventKey":"pr:reviewer:approved","date":"2018-10-08T14:29:51+0200","actor":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"pullRequest":{"id":2,"version":5,"title":"test edited online with Bitbucket","description":"abaöldflj","state":"OPEN","open":true,"closed":false,"createdDate":1538055333000,"updatedDate":153809000,"fromRef":{"id":"refs/heads/feature/checkitagain","displayId":"feature/checkitagain","latestCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":"Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"toRef":{"id":"refs/heads/master","displayId":"master","latestCommit":"ad359c8a9ba1eaf0bd2adec3aa37492c63966afb","repository":{"slug":"bitbucket-test","id":1960,"name":"bitbucket-test","scmId":"git","state":"AVAILABLE","statusMessage":"Available","forkable":true,"project":{"key":"DVSPRT","id":346,"name":"Development Support","description":"Everything related to development support, build system, development infrastructure. See https://confluence.tomtomgroup.com/x/bpB_K and https://tttjira.ttg.global:8441/browse/DVSPRT","public":false,"type":"NORMAL"},"public":false}},"locked":false,"author":{"user":{"name":"otherUserReplaced","emailAddress":"otherUserReplaced","id":11708,"displayName":"otherUserReplaced","active":true,"slug":"otherUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"role":"AUTHOR","approved":false,"status":"UNAPPROVED"},"reviewers":[{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"}],"participants":[]},"participant":{"user":{"name":"authorUserReplaced","emailAddress":"authorReplaced","id":13761,"displayName":"authorReplaced","active":true,"slug":"authorUserReplaced","type":"NORMAL"},"lastReviewedCommit":"d5b55683288bc89c23609f3087a02b6daf7eef06","role":"REVIEWER","approved":true,"status":"APPROVED"},"previousStatus":"UNAPPROVED"}'
 

 And has the same response 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-35708) EC2 Plugin: Ability to round robin EC2 availability zones

2018-10-08 Thread da...@davidfluck.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 David Fluck commented on  JENKINS-35708  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: EC2 Plugin: Ability to round robin EC2 availability zones   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Mikael Gaunin Sorry for the wait! I did, yeah. I should be able to rebase that shortly. Thank you!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-35708) EC2 Plugin: Ability to round robin EC2 availability zones

2018-10-08 Thread mgau...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mikael Gaunin commented on  JENKINS-35708  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: EC2 Plugin: Ability to round robin EC2 availability zones   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi David Fluck, we have a good chance to see your PR #295 reviewed soon since new maintainers work actively on this plugin! \o/ Did you see Matt Sicker 's comment on your PR?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-34354) Custom Slack Notification is dropped when there is a combined Slack notification

2018-10-08 Thread kma...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Kurt Madel resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-34354  
 
 
  Custom Slack Notification is dropped when there is a combined Slack notification   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Kurt Madel  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 2.3  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53606) SafeRestart Exception

2018-10-08 Thread scott.laven...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Scott Lavender updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53606  
 
 
  SafeRestart Exception   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Scott Lavender  
 
 
Comment: 
 I am getting a similar error when my Jenkins Chef cookbook attempts a safe-restart after adding plugins, etc. This works with the same cookbook code using Jenkins 2.121.3.{code:java}   Recipe: efx_jenkins::master * jenkins_command[safe-restart] action execute      Error executing action `execute` on resource 'jenkins_command[safe-restart]'      Mixlib::ShellOut::ShellCommandFailed      Expected process to exit with [0], but received '255'    Begin output of "java" -jar "/tmp/kitchen/cache/jenkins-cli.jar" -s http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/ -"remoting" -i "/tmp/kitchen/cache/jenkins-key" safe-restart    STDOUT:   STDERR: Oct 08, 2018 1:53:13 PM hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread run   SEVERE: I/O error in channel Chunked connection to http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/   java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channelat hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:77)   Caused by: java.io.EOFExceptionat java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream.java:2680)at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.readShort(ObjectInputStream.java:3155)at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readStreamHeader(ObjectInputStream.java:861)at java.io.ObjectInputStream.(ObjectInputStream.java:357)at hudson.remoting.ObjectInputStreamEx.(ObjectInputStreamEx.java:49)at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:140)at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:126)at hudson.remoting.AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.read(AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.java:36)at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:63)   hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: Channel "hudson.remoting.Channel@4f8e5cde:Chunked connection to http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/": channel is already closedat hudson.remoting.Channel.send(Channel.java:717)at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.doClose(ProxyOutputStream.java:174)at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.error(ProxyOutputStream.java:169)at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.close(ProxyOutputStream.java:160)at hudson.cli.Connection.close(Connection.java:269)at hudson.cli.CLI.authenticate(CLI.java:800)at hudson.cli.CLI._main(CLI.java:620)at hudson.cli.CLI.main(CLI.java:426)   Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channelat hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:77)   

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53606) SafeRestart Exception

2018-10-08 Thread scott.laven...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Scott Lavender commented on  JENKINS-53606  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: SafeRestart Exception   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I am getting a similar error when my Jenkins Chef cookbook attempts a safe-restart after adding plugins, etc. This works with the same cookbook code using Jenkins 2.121.3. 

 

   Recipe: efx_jenkins::master
 * jenkins_command[safe-restart] action execute   
   Error executing action `execute` on resource 'jenkins_command[safe-restart]'
      Mixlib::ShellOut::ShellCommandFailed
   
   Expected process to exit with [0], but received '255'
    Begin output of "java" -jar "/tmp/kitchen/cache/jenkins-cli.jar" -s http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/ -"remoting" -i "/tmp/kitchen/cache/jenkins-key" safe-restart 
   STDOUT:
   STDERR: Oct 08, 2018 1:53:13 PM hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread run
   SEVERE: I/O error in channel Chunked connection to http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/
   java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:77)
   Caused by: java.io.EOFException
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream.java:2680)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.readShort(ObjectInputStream.java:3155)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readStreamHeader(ObjectInputStream.java:861)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.(ObjectInputStream.java:357)
at hudson.remoting.ObjectInputStreamEx.(ObjectInputStreamEx.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:140)
at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:126)
at hudson.remoting.AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.read(AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.java:36)
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:63)   hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: Channel "hudson.remoting.Channel@4f8e5cde:Chunked connection to http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/": channel is already closed
at hudson.remoting.Channel.send(Channel.java:717)
at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.doClose(ProxyOutputStream.java:174)
at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.error(ProxyOutputStream.java:169)
at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.close(ProxyOutputStream.java:160)
at hudson.cli.Connection.close(Connection.java:269)
at hudson.cli.CLI.authenticate(CLI.java:800)
at hudson.cli.CLI._main(CLI.java:620)
at hudson.cli.CLI.main(CLI.java:426)
   Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:77)
   Caused by: java.io.EOFException
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream.java:2680)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.readShort(ObjectInputStream.java:3155)
at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53606) SafeRestart Exception

2018-10-08 Thread scott.laven...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Scott Lavender commented on  JENKINS-53606  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: SafeRestart Exception   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I get a similar exception when my Jenkins Chef cookbook attempts a safe-restart after configuring the newly created master instance. The only difference being that i'm using the remoting option. This same cookbook works with version 2.121.3 

 

   Recipe: efx_jenkins::master
 * jenkins_command[safe-restart] action execute   
   Error executing action `execute` on resource 'jenkins_command[safe-restart]'
      Mixlib::ShellOut::ShellCommandFailed
   
   Expected process to exit with [0], but received '255'
    Begin output of "java" -jar "/tmp/kitchen/cache/jenkins-cli.jar" -s http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/ -"remoting" -i "/tmp/kitchen/cache/jenkins-key" safe-restart 
   STDOUT:
   STDERR: Oct 08, 2018 1:53:13 PM hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread run
   SEVERE: I/O error in channel Chunked connection to http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/
   java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:77)
   Caused by: java.io.EOFException
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream.java:2680)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.readShort(ObjectInputStream.java:3155)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readStreamHeader(ObjectInputStream.java:861)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.(ObjectInputStream.java:357)
at hudson.remoting.ObjectInputStreamEx.(ObjectInputStreamEx.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:140)
at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:126)
at hudson.remoting.AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.read(AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.java:36)
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:63)   hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: Channel "hudson.remoting.Channel@4f8e5cde:Chunked connection to http://10.23.23.98:8080/gcs-kitchen-jenkins/": channel is already closed
at hudson.remoting.Channel.send(Channel.java:717)
at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.doClose(ProxyOutputStream.java:174)
at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.error(ProxyOutputStream.java:169)
at hudson.remoting.ProxyOutputStream.close(ProxyOutputStream.java:160)
at hudson.cli.Connection.close(Connection.java:269)
at hudson.cli.CLI.authenticate(CLI.java:800)
at hudson.cli.CLI._main(CLI.java:620)
at hudson.cli.CLI.main(CLI.java:426)
   Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:77)
   Caused by: java.io.EOFException
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream.java:2680)
at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-51577) Windows service wrapper for slave.jar can not connect to a SSL configured master

2018-10-08 Thread roman.donche...@intel.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Roman Donchenko commented on  JENKINS-51577  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Windows service wrapper for slave.jar can not connect to a SSL configured master   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Note that it's possible to fix this without modifying WinSW itself. You can add: 

 

"Switch.System.Net.DontEnableSchUseStrongCrypto=false"/>
 

 to the  section of jenkins-slave.exe.config. This will enable TLS 1.2 (and disable SSL 3.0) if WinSW is executed with .NET Framework 4.6 or later.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53945) Adding a new configuration to the azure-vm-agents-plugin to enable MSI

2018-10-08 Thread t-tog...@microsoft.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tom Ganor created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53945  
 
 
  Adding a new configuration to the azure-vm-agents-plugin to enable MSI   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  New Feature  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Azure DevOps  
 
 
Attachments: 
 MSI_config.png  
 
 
Components: 
 azure-vm-agents-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 13:38  
 
 
Labels: 
 plugin jenkins configuration slave  
 
 
Priority: 
  Critical  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Tom Ganor  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Adding a new configuration to the azure-vm-agents-plugin that can be modified when a VM is deployed.  The new configuration should provide us the ability to enable MSI (in azure portal it is under "settings" -> "Identity (Preview)" -> "status") - a screenshot is attached.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53499) Improve tests to avoid race condition for updates during startup

2018-10-08 Thread bat...@batmat.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Baptiste Mathus updated  JENKINS-53499  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53499  
 
 
  Improve tests to avoid race condition for updates during startup   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Baptiste Mathus  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov edited a comment on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h3. Summary of findings:I was able to work around this using [a few different methods|https://github.com/akomakom/jenkins-scripts/tree/master/pipeline-timeout-prekill]: * A *shell script* that traps and cleans up before kill  (not cross-platform)  * A *groovy script* that traps and cleans up before kill    * A pure pipeline *DSL script* that uses parallel closure to do the same without an external script (at the cost of uglier output)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53857) No option to disable build continuation when computer forcefully restarted

2018-10-08 Thread marley.kudia...@cubic.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Marley Kudiabor commented on  JENKINS-53857  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: No option to disable build continuation when computer forcefully restarted   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Appears to duplicate https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-50892  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53857) No option to disable build continuation when computer forcefully restarted

2018-10-08 Thread marley.kudia...@cubic.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Marley Kudiabor commented on  JENKINS-53857  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: No option to disable build continuation when computer forcefully restarted   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Oleg Nenashev We have multiple pipeline jobs and they all get stuck. What would you recommend?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread michelzan...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michel Zanini edited a comment on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 When you mean permissions you mean AWS permissions?I don't think that could be the issue because when I downgrade to 1.39 it starts working.The permissions are the same with both versions,  and  one  works the other not.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread michelzan...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michel Zanini commented on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 When you mean permissions you mean AWS permissions? I don't think that could be the issue because when I downgrade to 1.39 it starts working. The permissions are the same with both versions, and works the other not.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread fabrizio.manfr...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 FABRIZIO MANFREDI commented on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I am not sure if it is your bug, but I  found one ec2-plugin does not have enough permission to restart the stopped instance, the AWS call is failing without logs.  I am looking for the permissions that is missing   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread michelzan...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michel Zanini commented on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have tried removing tags, iamInstanceProfile and some other things and still the bug reproduces.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread michelzan...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michel Zanini commented on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This is my EC2 plugin configuration: 

 



  ami-0287cfa6afebea61f
  slave
  eu-west-1a
  sg-0669475f23a632a23
  /var/lib/jenkins
  T3Medium
  true
  false
  ec2 java ansible
  EXCLUSIVE
  
  
  
  2
  developer
  
  subnet-0475d56ca5686569c
  5
  arn:aws:iam::213123213123:instance-profile/system-jenkins-master-role-policy
  true
  false
  
  2
  true
  

  Name
  system-dev-jenkins-slave : slave


  Environment
  system-dev


  AvailabilityZone
  a


  Profile
  private


  ServiceName
  system-jenkins-slave


  ServiceOwner
  System

  
  true
  true
  false
  "hudson.plugins.ec2.UnixData">


999
  
  2147483647
  false
  false

  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread michelzan...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michel Zanini edited a comment on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Q. Do you have a custom tags ? - A.  Yes I have a few, but I have tried with no declared tags and also is not working Q. Do you have a description for the in the configuration for the pool ?  - A.  Yes, its just "slave". Q. Are you using Default or VPC configuration in Ec2? - A.  I am using a VPC that is not default (also, on my EC2 plugin config I am asking the slave to be created on a security group that is not the default) Q. Are the data of the filter correct for the Filter search ?  - A.  This is what I have on logs:{code:}{Filters: [{Name:image-id,Values: [ami-0287cfa6afebea61f]}, {Name: instance-type,Values:[t3.medium]}, {Name: key-name,Values: [developer]}, {Name:availability-zone,Values: [eu-west-1a]}, {Name: subnet-id,Values:[subnet-0475d56ca5686569c]}, {Name: instance.group-id,Values:[sg-0669475f23a632a23]}, {Name: tag:Name,Values: [system-dev-jenkins-slave :slave]}, {Name: tag:AvailabilityZone,Values: [a]}, {Name:tag:Environment,Values: [system-dev]}, {Name: tag:Profile,Values: [private]},{Name: tag:ServiceName,Values: [system-jenkins-slave]}, {Name:tag:ServiceOwner,Values: [System]}, {Name: tag:jenkins_slave_type,Values:[demand_slave]}],InstanceIds: [],} {code}All of the values above seems correct including the tags.I have tried removing all tags and trying without, but the result has being the same.You were not able to reproduce the issue?Thanks for looking into this.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread michelzan...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michel Zanini commented on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Do you have a custom tags ? 
 
Yes I have a few, but I have tried with no declared tags and also is not working Do you have a description for the in the configuration for the pool ?  
Yes, its just "slave". Are you using Default or VPC configuration in Ec2? 
I am using a VPC that is not default (also, on my EC2 plugin config I am asking the slave to be created on a security group that is not the default) Are the data of the filter correct for the Filter search ?  
This is what I have on logs: 
 

 

{Filters: [{Name:
image-id,Values: [ami-0287cfa6afebea61f]}, {Name: instance-type,Values:
[t3.medium]}, {Name: key-name,Values: [developer]}, {Name:
availability-zone,Values: [eu-west-1a]}, {Name: subnet-id,Values:
[subnet-0475d56ca5686569c]}, {Name: instance.group-id,Values:
[sg-0669475f23a632a23]}, {Name: tag:Name,Values: [system-dev-jenkins-slave :
slave]}, {Name: tag:AvailabilityZone,Values: [a]}, {Name:
tag:Environment,Values: [system-dev]}, {Name: tag:Profile,Values: [private]},
{Name: tag:ServiceName,Values: [system-jenkins-slave]}, {Name:
tag:ServiceOwner,Values: [System]}, {Name: tag:jenkins_slave_type,Values:
[demand_slave]}],InstanceIds: [],} 
 

 All of the values above seems correct including the tags. I have tried removing all tags and trying without, but the result has being the same. You were not able to reproduce the issue? Thanks for looking into this.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov edited a comment on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It appears to be the way Bash works.  The very first example [here|https://www.tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/sect_12_02.html] shows that although it is possible to trap the signal and prevent the bash shell from exiting, it is not possible to prevent the currently executing shell command (sleep in this case) from also receiving the signal, hence the while loop.  I was able to create a groovy wrapper script using the approach [suggested here|https://stackoverflow.com/a/8851685/1735931] and that works correctly (both options in this answer work). UPDATE: the trick with bash is to [background the main process|https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/146770/199293]...   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov edited a comment on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 h3. Summary of findings:I was able to work around this using [a few different methods|https://github.com/akomakom/jenkins-scripts/tree/master/pipeline-timeout-prekill]: * A  *  shell script *  that traps and cleans up before kill * A  *  groovy script *  that traps and cleans up before kill * A pure pipeline  *  DSL  block  script*  that uses parallel closure to do the same without an external script (at the cost of uglier output)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov closed an issue as Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53315  
 
 
  Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Alexander Komarov  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53315) Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body

2018-10-08 Thread r...@akom.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Komarov commented on  JENKINS-53315  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Timeout step should support a closure to execute prior to killing body   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Summary of findings: I was able to work around this using a few different methods: 
 
A shell script that traps and cleans up before kill 
A groovy script that traps and cleans up before kill 
A pure pipeline DSL block that uses parallel closure to do the same without an external script (at the cost of uglier output) 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53944) Findbugs pulls in a very old Xerces library version

2018-10-08 Thread atay...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alex Taylor created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53944  
 
 
  Findbugs pulls in a very old Xerces library version   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Ulli Hafner  
 
 
Components: 
 findbugs-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 12:17  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Alex Taylor  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Looking at the pom I can see that the findbugs plugin pulls in 2.9.1 of the xerces library. Is it possible to step this up to a newer version? This caused an issue in the pipeline maven plugin which was difficult to track down.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-39464) Pipeline with parallel and no stages does not get visualised correctly

2018-10-08 Thread trane9...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Taras Postument commented on  JENKINS-39464  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline with parallel and no stages does not get visualised correctly   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Vivek Pandey I'm facing the same problem. Any progress here? See my complete issue described here: JENKINS-39464  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53933) set file permission on ssh key when on windows to enable OpenSSH client

2018-10-08 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite assigned an issue to Joseph Petersen  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53933  
 
 
  set file permission on ssh key when on windows to enable OpenSSH client   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mark Waite  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Mark Waite Joseph Petersen  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53941) new feature

2018-10-08 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite updated  JENKINS-53941  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Insufficiently described. I assume this was being used as a demonstration by someone.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53941  
 
 
  new feature   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mark Waite  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Fixed but Unreleased  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Cannot Reproduce  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53941) new feature

2018-10-08 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite updated  JENKINS-53941  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53941  
 
 
  new feature   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mark Waite  
 
 
Status: 
 Fixed but Unreleased Closed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53941) new feature

2018-10-08 Thread mark.earl.wa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mark Waite assigned an issue to Unassigned  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53941  
 
 
  new feature   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Mark Waite  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Mark Waite  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-48955) master-slave connection getting terminated once in every 12 hours and recovered after 1 minute

2018-10-08 Thread eug...@chepurniy.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Eugene Chepurniy commented on  JENKINS-48955  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: master-slave connection getting terminated once in every 12 hours and recovered after 1 minute   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Ivan Fernandez Calvo I'm going to give this solution a chance and provide a feedback here. Thanks for staying in touch.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53920) After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again

2018-10-08 Thread fabrizio.manfr...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 FABRIZIO MANFREDI edited a comment on  JENKINS-53920  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After upgrade to 1.40 the slaves that are stopped via stopOnTerminate are not started again   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It seems the filter for get the list of the nodes is not working properly, can you tell me the value of the tags in the amazon console of the stop instance and the running instances ? do you have a custom tags ? do you have a description for the in the configuration for the pool ?  The description is used to build a unique tags for the search and it seems empty:    the tag should be tag name:jenkins_slave_type value:demand_[description] Are you using Default or VPC configuration in Ec2?     Are the data of the filter correct for the Filter search ?   [ \ {Name: image-id,Values:[ami-123123213123]},{Name: instance-type,Values: [t3.medium]}  ,{Name: key-name,Values: [developer]}  ,{Name: availability-zone,Values: [eu-west-1a]}  , \ {Name: subnet-id,Values: [subnet-1]},{Name: instance.group-id,Values: [sg-1]}  ,{Name: tag:jenkins_slave_type,Values: [demand_Slave]}  ],InstanceIds: [],}   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53943) Parallel jobs run on the same node, though they have 2 other nodes to run on

2018-10-08 Thread xavi.albil...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Xavi Albillos updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53943  
 
 
  Parallel jobs run on the same node, though they have 2 other nodes to run on   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Xavi Albillos  
 
 
Attachment: 
 Jenkinsfile  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53943) Parallel jobs run on the same node, though they have 2 other nodes to run on

2018-10-08 Thread xavi.albil...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Xavi Albillos created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53943  
 
 
  Parallel jobs run on the same node, though they have 2 other nodes to run on   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Attachments: 
 modchrome.png  
 
 
Components: 
 core  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 11:10  
 
 
Labels: 
 schedule  
 
 
Priority: 
  Critical  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Xavi Albillos  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 In my multi-branch pipeline, I set a parallel stage where one or two stages will be skipped. I do this because I can't nest parallel stages. The problem is, when this happens, I have 2 jobs running on one node, while the other 2 nodes are idle. This should not be happening and I have no way to control this, as they should be scheduled to balance load...   All stages are marked with agent any.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53900) Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows

2018-10-08 Thread ekas...@murex.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Elie Kassis edited a comment on  JENKINS-53900  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~sophistifunk], you can check the attached pipeline code on which we are facing the issue.Noting that in the example you provided there the no sequential stages inside the parallel  nodes.*{color:#0747a6}In addition your code that launch parallel stages is totally different then the  one  we are using .  Can you please tell us how using your way to have sequential stages inside parallel nodes?{color}*  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53900) Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows

2018-10-08 Thread ekas...@murex.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Elie Kassis commented on  JENKINS-53900  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Josh McDonald, you can check the attached pipeline code on which we are facing the issue. Noting that in the example you provided there the no sequential stages inside the parallel one.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53900) Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows

2018-10-08 Thread ekas...@murex.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Elie Kassis updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53900  
 
 
  Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Elie Kassis  
 
 
Attachment: 
 pipeline_example.groovy  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53900) Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows

2018-10-08 Thread ekas...@murex.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Elie Kassis updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53900  
 
 
  Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Elie Kassis  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows. As shown in below pipeline the last 2 parallel stages are missing in Blue Ocean noting that they were executed. you can find the code as per the attached.  !image-2018-10-04-13-00-11-064.png|width=581,height=138!  {code:java}pipeline { agent any stages {  stage('Prepare Workflow') {   steps {script { //get Reference println("Getting References")}   }  }  stage('Generate Debug Job') {   steps {script { println("Generate Debug Job")}   }  }  stage('Pushing 2 Tests and 2 Debug jobs') {   //failFast true   parallel {stage('TE1') { stages {  stage('PUSH TE1') {   steps {script { println("PUSH TE1")}   }  }  stage('Archive Logs') {   steps {script { println("Archive TE1 Logs")}   }  }  stage('Insert Metrics') {   steps {script { println("Insert TE1 Metrics in DB")}   }  }  stage('Compare Metrics') {   steps {script { println("Compare Metrics TE1 vs REF")}   }  } }}stage('TE2') { stages {  stage('PUSH TE2') {   steps {script { println("PUSH TE2")}   }  }  stage('Archive Logs') {   steps {script { println("Archive TE2 Logs")}   }  }  stage('Insert Metrics') {   steps {script { println("Insert TE2 Metrics in DB")}   }  }  stage('Compare Metrics') {   steps {script { println("Compare Metrics TE2 vs REF")}   }  } }}stage('HEAD DEBUG') { stages {  stage('PUSH HEAD DEBUG') {   steps {script { println("PUSH HEAD DEBUG")}   }  }  stage('DEPLOY CLIENT HEAD') {   steps {script { println("Deploying Client HEAD")}   }  } }}stage('REF DEBUG') { stages {  stage('PUSH REF DEBUG') {   steps {script { println("PUSH REF DEBUG")}   }  }  stage('DEPLOY CLIENT REF') {   steps {script { println("Deploying Client REF")}   }  } }}   }  }  stage('CrossChecking') {   steps {script { println("CrossChecking")}   }  }  stage('SetReferences') {   steps {script { println("Set References")}   }  }  stage('Head vs Head-1') {   steps {script { println("Head vs Head-1")}   }  }  stage('Send MAIL and Insert JIRA') {   parallel {stage('Sending Mail') { stages {  stage('Send MAIL') {   steps {script { println("Sending Mail")}   }  } }}stage('Inserting Jira') { stages {  stage('Insert JIRA') {   steps {script { println 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53740) Introduce a way how to disable deferred Wipeout

2018-10-08 Thread pjano...@redhat.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pavel Janoušek updated  JENKINS-53740  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Merged upstream.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53740  
 
 
  Introduce a way how to disable deferred Wipeout   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Pavel Janoušek  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Done  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53900) Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows

2018-10-08 Thread ekas...@murex.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Elie Kassis updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53900  
 
 
  Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Elie Kassis  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows. As shown in below pipeline the last 2 parallel stages are missing in Blue Ocean noting that they were executed. !image-2018-10-04-13-00-11-064.png|width=581,height=138! {code:java}pipeline { agent any stages {  stage('Prepare Workflow') {   steps {script {  //get Reference  println("Getting References")}   }  }  stage('Generate Debug Job') {   steps {script {  println("Generate Debug Job")}   }  }  stage('Pushing 2 Tests and 2 Debug jobs') {   //failFast true   parallel {  stage('TE1') { stages {  stage('PUSH TE1') {        steps {script {  println("PUSH TE1")}   }  }  stage('Archive Logs') {   steps {script {  println("Archive TE1 Logs")}   }  }  stage('Insert Metrics') {   steps {script {  println("Insert TE1 Metrics in DB")}   }  }  stage('Compare Metrics') {   steps {script {  println("Compare Metrics TE1 vs REF")}   }  } }}stage('TE2') { stages {  stage('PUSH TE2') {   steps {script {  println("PUSH TE2")}   }  }  stage('Archive Logs') {   steps {script {  println("Archive TE2 Logs")}   }  }  stage('Insert Metrics') {   steps {script {  println("Insert TE2 Metrics in DB")}   }  }  stage('Compare Metrics') {   steps {script {  println("Compare Metrics TE2 vs REF")}   }  } }}stage('HEAD DEBUG') { stages {  stage('PUSH HEAD DEBUG') {   steps {script {  println("PUSH HEAD DEBUG")}   }  }  stage('DEPLOY CLIENT HEAD') {   steps {script {  println("Deploying Client HEAD")}   }  } }}stage('REF DEBUG') { stages {  stage('PUSH REF DEBUG') {   steps {script {  println("PUSH REF DEBUG")}   }  }  stage('DEPLOY CLIENT REF') {   steps {script {  println("Deploying Client REF")}   }  } }}     }  }    stage('CrossChecking') {   steps {script {  println("CrossChecking")}   }  }  stage('SetReferences') {   steps {script {  println("Set References")}   }  }  stage('Head vs Head-1') {   steps {script {  println("Head vs Head-1")}   }  }  stage('Send MAIL and Insert JIRA') {   parallel {stage('Sending Mail') { stages {  stage('Send MAIL') {   steps {script {  println("Sending Mail")}   }  } }}stage('Inserting Jira') { stages {  stage('Insert JIRA') {   steps {script {  println "Inserting 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53900) Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows

2018-10-08 Thread ekas...@murex.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Elie Kassis updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53900  
 
 
  Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Elie Kassis  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Stage graph in Blue Ocean not showing all stages for large workflows. As shown in below pipeline the last 2 parallel stages are missing in Blue Ocean noting that they were executed. !image-2018-10-04-13-00-11-064.png|width=581,height=138! {code:java}pipeline {  options {  timeout(time: 4, unit: 'HOURS')  ansiColor('xterm') } // agent any  agent {  node {   label 'pacpte_dell1114srv'  } }  stages {  stage('Prepare Workflow') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   //get Reference  println("Getting References") }}   }   }   stage('Generate Debug Job') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Generate Debug Job") }}   }   }   stage('Pushing 2 Tests and 2 Debug jobs') {   //failFast true   parallel {  stage('TE1') { stages {  stage('PUSH TE1') {    options {retry(2)timeout(time: 3, unit: 'HOURS')   }       steps {script {  timestamps {   println("PUSH TE1") }}   }   }   stage('Archive Logs') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Archive TE1 Logs") }}   }   }   stage('Insert Metrics') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Insert TE1 Metrics in DB") }}   }   }   stage('Compare Metrics') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Compare Metrics TE1 vs REF") }}   }  } } } stage('TE2') { stages {  stage('PUSH TE2') {    options {retry(2)timeout(time: 3, unit: 'HOURS')   }    steps {script {  timestamps {   println("PUSH TE2") }}   }   }   stage('Archive Logs') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Archive TE2 Logs") }}   }   }   stage('Insert Metrics') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Insert TE2 Metrics in DB") }}   }   }   stage('Compare Metrics') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Compare Metrics TE2 vs REF") }}   }  } } } stage('HEAD DEBUG') { stages {  stage('PUSH HEAD DEBUG') {    options {retry(2)timeout(time: 2, unit: 'HOURS')   }    steps {script {  timestamps {   println("PUSH HEAD DEBUG") }}   }   }   stage('DEPLOY CLIENT HEAD') {   steps {script {  timestamps {   println("Deploying Client HEAD") }}   }  } } } stage('REF DEBUG') { stages {  stage('PUSH REF DEBUG') {    options {retry(2)timeout(time: 2, unit: 'HOURS')   }    

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53942) Jobs using Artifactory plugin are disappeared post the plugin upgrade

2018-10-08 Thread pushkalasuriyanaraya...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pushkala Suriyanarayanan created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53942  
 
 
  Jobs using Artifactory plugin are disappeared post the plugin upgrade   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Eyal Ben Moshe  
 
 
Components: 
 artifactory-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2018-10-08 10:34  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins version 2.121.3; Artifactory Plugin version 2.15.0 and above causes the issue, Operating system is RedHat Linux  
 
 
Priority: 
  Blocker  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Pushkala Suriyanarayanan  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The jobs which uses artifactory plugin are not visible and the other jobs seems to be crashed(Not able to configure) post the artifactory plugin upgrade to version 2.15.0 or above.. We have to upgrade the atifactory plugin inorder to fix the JEP-200 issue.. Jenkins version is 2.121.3; Artifactory Plugin version 2.15.0 and above causes the issue, Operating system is RedHat Linux..  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-53675) Exclusion annotation for access-modifier-checker

2018-10-08 Thread sa...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Steve Arch resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53675  
 
 
  Exclusion annotation for access-modifier-checker   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Steve Arch  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 access-modifier:1.16  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-53906) Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144

2018-10-08 Thread frank.shim...@est.fujitsu.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Frank Shimizu updated  JENKINS-53906  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Fixed by downgrading to a non-corrupt gradle plugin version.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-53906  
 
 
  Jenkins fails to start with Exception after update to 2.144   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Frank Shimizu  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Fixed but Unreleased  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  1   2   >