[JIRA] (JENKINS-36928) Job PO does not accurately reflects the real job underlying state

2016-07-28 Thread rarabaol...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Raul Arabaolaza updated  JENKINS-36928  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-36928  
 
 
  Job PO does not accurately reflects the real job underlying state
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Raul Arabaolaza  
 
 
Status: 
 In  Progress  Review  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-36928) Job PO does not accurately reflects the real job underlying state

2016-07-26 Thread rarabaol...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Raul Arabaolaza started work on  JENKINS-36928  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Raul Arabaolaza  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-36928) Job PO does not accurately reflects the real job underlying state

2016-07-26 Thread rec...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Manuel Recena Soto updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-36928  
 
 
  Job PO does not accurately reflects the real job underlying state
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Manuel Recena Soto  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Consider the following code{code:java}FreeStyleJob j = jenkins.jobs.create(FreeStyleJob.class, "simple-job");j.configure();j.addParameter(StringParameter.class).setName("Param1").setDefault("");j.save();jenkins.jobs.copy(j, "simple-job-copy");assertThat(driver, hasContent("simple-job-copy"));FreeStyleJob k = jenkins.jobs.get(FreeStyleJob.class, "simple-job-copy");j.visit("config.xml");String jxml = driver.getPageSource();k.visit("config.xml");String kxml = driver.getPageSource();assertThat(jxml, is(kxml));assertTrue(k.getParameters().size() == j.getParameters().size());assertTrue(k.getParameters().containsAll(j.getParameters()));{code}It fails because  `  {{ Job.getParameters() ` }}  is not backed by the real job conf (as is for example  `  {{ Job.getNextBuildNumber() ` }}  and  `  {{ Job.get() ` }}  does not take into account existing state or conf of the job to create the PO. Resulting in situations where the Job PO seems to have no build parameters but the real job has. This makes methods like  `  {{ Job.scheduleBuild(params) ` }}  not working for this objects.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-36928) Job PO does not accurately reflects the real job underlying state

2016-07-25 Thread rarabaol...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Raul Arabaolaza created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-36928  
 
 
  Job PO does not accurately reflects the real job underlying state
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Task  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Raul Arabaolaza  
 
 
Components: 
 acceptance-test-harness  
 
 
Created: 
 2016/Jul/25 5:27 PM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Raul Arabaolaza  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Consider the following code 

 

FreeStyleJob j = jenkins.jobs.create(FreeStyleJob.class, "simple-job");
j.configure();
j.addParameter(StringParameter.class).setName("Param1").setDefault("");
j.save();
jenkins.jobs.copy(j, "simple-job-copy");
assertThat(driver, hasContent("simple-job-copy"));

FreeStyleJob k = jenkins.jobs.get(FreeStyleJob.class, "simple-job-copy");

j.visit("config.xml");
String jxml = driver.getPageSource();

k.visit("config.xml");
String kxml = driver.getPageSource();

assertThat(jxml, is(kxml));
assertTrue(k.getParameters().size() == j.getParameters().size());
assertTrue(k.getParameters().containsAll(j.getParameters()));
 

 It fails because `Job.getParameters()` is not backed by the real job conf (as is for example `Job.getNextBuildNumber()` and `Job.get()` does not take into account existing state or conf of the job to create the PO. Resulting in situations where the Job PO seems to have no build parameters but the real job has. This makes methods like `Job.scheduleBuild(params)` not working for this objects.