[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-14 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162740#comment-162740
 ] 

Ulli Hafner commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://faktorzehn.org:8081/images/16x16/blue.png! [Jenkins 
Analysis Plug-ins (Compile) 
#502|http://faktorzehn.org:8081/job/Jenkins%20Analysis%20Plug-ins%20(Compile)/502/]
 [JENKINS-12424] Added links to new and priority warnings. (Revision 
b72cda9a98a5d11b5b4be355bf87d9aa30f55e86)

 Result = SUCCESS

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-14 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ulli Hafner resolved JENKINS-12424.
---

Resolution: Fixed

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-14 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162748#comment-162748
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResultEvaluator.java
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_de.properties
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/analysis-core-plugin/5c21e8054698196040a75cf4f18944b8bef94d51
Log:
  [Fixed JENKINS-12424] Added messages for one warning.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-14 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162759#comment-162759
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png! 
[plugins_analysis-core 
#10451|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_analysis-core/10451/]
 [JENKINS-12424] Added links to new and priority warnings. (Revision 
b72cda9a98a5d11b5b4be355bf87d9aa30f55e86)
[Fixed JENKINS-12424] Added messages for one warning. (Revision 
5c21e8054698196040a75cf4f18944b8bef94d51)

 Result = SUCCESS
Ulli Hafner : 
Files : 
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/ReporterDescriptor.java
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/HealthAwarePublisher.java
* src/test/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResultEvaluatorTest.java
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/MavenResultAction.java
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResult.java
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_de.properties
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResultEvaluator.java
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/HealthAwareReporter.java
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages.properties
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/AbstractResultAction.java

Ulli Hafner : 
Files : 
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_de.properties
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResultEvaluator.java
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages.properties


 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162567#comment-162567
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResult.java
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/util/HtmlPrinter.java
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_de.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_fr.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_ja.properties
 src/test/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResultTest.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/analysis-core-plugin/882d0579575d069b2e45e4528dd70bb2ccc68020
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up build result summary message to BuildResult.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162568#comment-162568
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 pom.xml
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/dry/DryResult.java
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/dry/ResultSummary.java
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/dry/Messages.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/dry/Messages_de.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/dry/Messages_ja.properties
 src/test/java/hudson/plugins/dry/ResultSummaryTest.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/dry-plugin/3b34bf609768117b4aa419de8b91bb7af8923ac9
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Use messages from base class.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162572#comment-162572
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 pom.xml
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/collector/AnalysisResult.java
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/collector/AnalysisResultSummary.java
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/collector/Messages.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/collector/Messages_de.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/collector/Messages_ja.properties
 src/test/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/collector/ResultSummaryTest.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/analysis-collector-plugin/5743c8c7b9035e3c4e0a1d0543f8307f6469029c
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Use messages from base class.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162571#comment-162571
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 pom.xml
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/pmd/PmdResult.java
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/pmd/ResultSummary.java
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/pmd/Messages.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/pmd/Messages_de.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/pmd/Messages_fr.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/pmd/Messages_ja.properties
 src/test/java/hudson/plugins/pmd/ResultSummaryTest.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/pmd-plugin/933785d4f694c9bbbd07f18b17e8badf0dff4953
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Use messages from base class.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162570#comment-162570
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 plugin/pom.xml
 plugin/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/findbugs/FindBugsResult.java
 plugin/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/findbugs/ResultSummary.java
 plugin/src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/findbugs/Messages.properties
 plugin/src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/findbugs/Messages_de.properties
 plugin/src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/findbugs/Messages_ja.properties
 plugin/src/test/java/hudson/plugins/findbugs/ResultSummaryTest.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/findbugs-plugin/fbbb1fef2619c783f0ee49a652234cb127b737f4
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Use messages from base class.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162569#comment-162569
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 pom.xml
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/CheckStyleResult.java
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/ResultSummary.java
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/Messages.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/Messages_de.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/Messages_fr.properties
 src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/Messages_ja.properties
 src/test/java/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/ResultSummaryTest.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/checkstyle-plugin/c9863ac5e7a939f58897200225a724063555f08f
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Use messages from base class.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162576#comment-162576
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/checkstyle/CheckStyleResultAction.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/checkstyle-plugin/f0fab6a73c1197d5f78b2493789c3e4ae9692f5b
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162575#comment-162575
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/AbstractResultAction.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/analysis-core-plugin/fde91c34942a51e50d8be0d2eba7df08ed52534b
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162577#comment-162577
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/dry/DryResultAction.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/dry-plugin/e0c7b51ab19fe8749a0be2b8d105d0c2f820d210
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162579#comment-162579
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 plugin/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/findbugs/FindBugsResultAction.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/findbugs-plugin/09423284d787f23cd1397070c43303967a3451ce
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162581#comment-162581
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/collector/AnalysisResultAction.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/analysis-collector-plugin/6d57f9725542884510355622b84692b0ede612ea
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162582#comment-162582
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png! 
[plugins_analysis-core 
#10448|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_analysis-core/10448/]
 [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up build result summary message to BuildResult. 
(Revision 882d0579575d069b2e45e4528dd70bb2ccc68020)

 Result = SUCCESS
Ulli Hafner : 
Files : 
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_fr.properties
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_de.properties
* src/test/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResultTest.java
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages_ja.properties
* src/main/resources/hudson/plugins/analysis/Messages.properties
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/util/HtmlPrinter.java
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/BuildResult.java


 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread scm_issue_l...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162580#comment-162580
 ] 

SCM/JIRA link daemon commented on JENKINS-12424:


Code changed in jenkins
User: Ulli Hafner
Path:
 src/main/java/hudson/plugins/warnings/WarningsResultAction.java
http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/warnings-plugin/27ced4879f77753a48b4ab60a7a0e09426758ef8
Log:
  [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips.






 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162583#comment-162583
 ] 

Ulli Hafner commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://faktorzehn.org:8081/images/16x16/blue.png! [Jenkins 
Analysis Plug-ins (Compile) 
#495|http://faktorzehn.org:8081/job/Jenkins%20Analysis%20Plug-ins%20(Compile)/495/]
 [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips. (Revision 
fde91c34942a51e50d8be0d2eba7df08ed52534b)

 Result = SUCCESS

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162584#comment-162584
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png! 
[plugins_analysis-core 
#10449|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_analysis-core/10449/]
 [JENKINS-12424] Pulled up tool tips. (Revision 
fde91c34942a51e50d8be0d2eba7df08ed52534b)

 Result = SUCCESS
Ulli Hafner : 
Files : 
* src/main/java/hudson/plugins/analysis/core/AbstractResultAction.java


 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162586#comment-162586
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png! 
[plugins_checkstyle #346|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_checkstyle/346/]
 
 Result = SUCCESS

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162587#comment-162587
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png! [plugins_dry 
#349|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_dry/349/]
 
 Result = SUCCESS

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162585#comment-162585
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png! 
[plugins_analysis-collector 
#354|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_analysis-collector/354/]
 
 Result = SUCCESS

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162590#comment-162590
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/yellow.png! 
[plugins_warnings #408|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_warnings/408/]
 
 Result = UNSTABLE

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-05-08 Thread dogf...@java.net (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=162589#comment-162589
 ] 

dogfood commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png! [plugins_pmd 
#348|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/plugins_pmd/348/]
 
 Result = SUCCESS

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-03-02 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ulli Hafner reopened JENKINS-12424:
---


Yes, that would improve that usability even more. 

Since this feature needs the HTML links from the individual plug-ins, changes 
to all plug-ins are required (and not only to analysis-core). So this will take 
some time...

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-02-07 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=158745#comment-158745
 ] 

Ulli Hafner edited comment on JENKINS-12424 at 2/7/12 9:19 PM:
---

Ok, I added the message to the build summary:

{code}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new.priority={0} new warnings of priority {3} 
exceeded the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all.priority={0} warnings of priority {3} exceed 
the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new={0} new warnings exceeded the threshold of {1} 
by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all={0} warnings exceed the threshold of {1} by {2}
{code}


Can you please check if these messages are ok (and correct English)? The 
numbers in the brackets are replaced by values.

  was (Author: drulli):
Ok, I added the message to the build summary:

{code}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new.priority={0} new warnings of priority {3} 
exceeded the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all.priority={0} warnings of priority {3} exceed 
the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new={0} new warnings exceeded the threshold of {1} 
by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all={0} warnings exceed the threshold of {1} by {2}
{code}


Can you please check if these messages are ok (and correct english)? The 
numbers in the brackets are replaced by values.
  
 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-02-07 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=158745#comment-158745
 ] 

Ulli Hafner edited comment on JENKINS-12424 at 2/7/12 9:21 PM:
---

Ok, I added the message to the build summary:

{code}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new.priority={0} new warnings of priority {3} 
exceed the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all.priority={0} warnings of priority {3} exceed 
the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new={0} new warnings exceed the threshold of {1} 
by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all={0} warnings exceed the threshold of {1} by {2}
{code}


Can you please check if these messages are ok (and correct English)? The 
numbers in the brackets are replaced by values.

  was (Author: drulli):
Ok, I added the message to the build summary:

{code}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new.priority={0} new warnings of priority {3} 
exceeded the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all.priority={0} warnings of priority {3} exceed 
the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new={0} new warnings exceeded the threshold of {1} 
by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all={0} warnings exceed the threshold of {1} by {2}
{code}


Can you please check if these messages are ok (and correct English)? The 
numbers in the brackets are replaced by values.
  
 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-02-07 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=158745#comment-158745
 ] 

Ulli Hafner commented on JENKINS-12424:
---

Ok, I added the message to the build summary:

{code}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new.priority={0} new warnings of priority {3} 
exceeded the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all.priority={0} warnings of priority {3} exceed 
the threshold of {1} by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.new={0} new warnings exceeded the threshold of {1} 
by {2}
BuildResultEvaluator.failure.all={0} warnings exceed the threshold of {1} by {2}
{code}


Can you please check if these messages are ok (and correct english)? The 
numbers in the brackets are replaced by values.

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[JIRA] (JENKINS-12424) More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings

2012-02-07 Thread monc...@raytheon.com (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=158746#comment-158746
 ] 

Greg Moncreaff commented on JENKINS-12424:
--

Messages look fine.  Thank you for doing this!

 More correct and specific build state change reasons from Warnings 
 ---

 Key: JENKINS-12424
 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-12424
 Project: Jenkins
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: analysis-core, warnings
Reporter: Greg Moncreaff
Assignee: Ulli Hafner
Priority: Minor

 I got this in my jobs console.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since total number of annotations 
 exceeds the threshold 200: [HIGH, NORMAL, LOW]
 Two issues.
 1. text says total, but this was actually a compute status since reference 
 build (new) gate.
 2. text should say which specific criteria was exceeded
 3. it doesn't tell you what the actual number/difference was
 E.g.
 [WARNINGS] Setting build status to FAILURE since number, 234, of new HIGH 
 annotations exceeds the threshold of 200 by 34 or 17%.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira